Skip to content

· Private foundation

The 908 Alta Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$141k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Environment$307kArts & Culture$153kEducation$73kReligion$50kAnimals$50kScience & Tech$45kFood & Nutrition$6kInternational$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $6k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $60k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $75k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$75,000
AMON CARTER MUSEUM$25,000
CORNELL LAB OF ORNITHOLOGY$25,000
NATURE CONSERVANCY OF LOUISIANA$10,000
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN$2,500
CHAFFEE CO COMM FDN$1,791
Individual grant recipient$1,000
INTL RESCUE COMMITTEE$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–19, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CENTER FOR TRANSFORMING LIVES: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
MN
NY
CT
CA
DC
LA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$729k · 7 repeat orgs$177k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +8% since the first grant, against +0% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
9

Total granted

$729k
$170k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+8%
+0%

Still filing today

43%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalArts & CultureScience & TechEducationHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NC
    NATURE CONSERVANCY OF LOUISIANA
    8× · 2018–2025 · $217k
  • AC
    AMON CARTER MUSEUM OF WESTERN ART
    6× · 2018–2025 · $175k · revenue -24%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2024–2025 · $145k

Funded once

  • BI
    BOTANIC INSTITUTE OF TEXAS
    one grant, 2023 · $100k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE FOUNDAT
    one grant, 2023 · $50k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $7k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.": - count it: our work is…

International
2
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
3
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
4
Texas Christian University

Texas christian university is an institution of higher education which includes nine major academic units: liberal arts, science and engineering, business, education, fine arts, communication, honors, nursing and health sciences, and the…

Education
5
Association for Computing Machinery Inc

We are an intl. scientific & educational org. dedicated to advancing art, science & technology.

Science & Tech
6
Women's Refugee Commission Inc

To improve the lives and protect the rights of women, children and youth displaced by conflict and crisis. the women's refugee commission envisions a world in which refugees are safe, healthy and reliant and seeks to drive change in…

Human Services
7
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
8
Washington Office On Latin America

To advance human rights and social justice in the americas.

International
9
The Central European University

Ceu is committed to promoting the values of open society and self-reflective critical thinking. it aims at excellence in the mastery of established knowledge, courage to pursue the creation of new knowledge in the humanities, the social…

International
10
Science Museum of Minnesota

The museum's mission statement is "turn on the science: inspire learning. inform policy. improve lives."

Arts & Culture
11
World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals

To boldly engage the world's greatest crises in partnership with the church.

International
12
Texas State Aquarium Association

The texas state aquarium's mission is engaging people with animals, inspiring appreciation for our seas, and supporting wildlife conservation. its vision is to be a global leader in fostering support for the conservation of the gulf of…

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Save the Children Federation Inc; the most unlike its peers is International Rescue Committee Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NATURE CONSERVANCY OF LOUISIANA: $216,678 · OtherNATURE CONSERVANCY OF LOUISIANAIndividual grant recipient: $145,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBOTANIC INSTITUTE OF TEXAS: $100,000 · OtherBOTANIC INSTITUTE OF TEXASCORNELL LAB OF ORNITHOLOGY: $75,000 · OtherCORNELL LAB OF ORNITHOLOGYST STEPHEN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $50,000 · OtherST STEPHEN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHUNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE FOUNDAT: $50,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE FOUNDAT+6 more: $19,166 · OtherAMON CARTER MUSEUM OF WESTERN ART: $175,000 · Arts & CultureAMON CARTER MUSEUM OF …+1 more: $2,500 · Arts & CultureBOTANICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF TEXAS INC: $45,000 · Science & TechLOYOLA MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY: $22,500 · EducationInternational Rescue Committee INC: $2,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $1,000 · InternationalSave The Children Federation Inc: $1,000 · InternationalCENTER FOR TRANSFORMING LIVES: $1,000 · Human Services
Other$655,844Arts & Culture$177,500Science & Tech$45,000Education$22,500International$4,000Human Services$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMON CARTER MUSEUM OF WESTERN ART: $175,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetBOTANICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF TEXAS INC: $45,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetLOYOLA MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY: $22,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTexas Association of Museums: $2,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR TRANSFORMING LIVES: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AMON CARTER MUSEUM OF WESTERN ART ↗
  • Who funds BOTANICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF TEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds LOYOLA MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Texas Association of Museums ↗
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR TRANSFORMING LIVES ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Communities Foundation of Texas IncTX13.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Texas Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The 908 Alta Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The 908 Alta Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The 908 Alta Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The 908 Alta Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on 908 Alta’s filings →

More from the funding graph