Skip to content
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

California · Public charity

The 1990 Institute

Our mission is to support fair and equitable treatment for asian americans and a constructive u.s.-china relationship through leadership, education, and collaboration.

$16k
Granted FY2019
3
Grants FY2019
2
Organizations funded FY2019
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2019
$1,000
Largest grant, FY2019
$15,000
States reached, FY2019
2
Total assets, FY2019
$463k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2019 to FY2019, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
The Asia Society$15,00010%
Committee of 100 Inc$39510%

Compare The 1990 Institute with peer funders

About The 1990 Institute

How much does The 1990 Institute give?
The 1990 Institute reported 3 grants totaling $16,395 in its FY2019 IRS filing.
What does The 1990 Institute fund?
By grant dollars over FY2019 to FY2019, its largest causes are International (91%), Education (6%), Civil Rights (2%).
Who are The 1990 Institute's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2019 to FY2019: The Asia Society ($15k), Committee of 100 Inc ($395).
Where is The 1990 Institute based?
The 1990 Institute is based in CA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 3 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $350 of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2019, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on 1990 Institute’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home