Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Mellen Charitable Fdn (Fka Tf Fdn)

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$36M
Granted FY2024still arriving
17
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$25M
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20212024.

Philanthropy$28MHealth$11MEmployment$2.7MEducation$2.4MHuman Services$2.0MAnimals$750kHousing & Shelter$750kPublic Safety & Disaster$250kOther$0
02FY2024 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $50k–250k2 grants · $400k
  • $250k+15 grants · $35M
$425,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$308M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEROME AVENUE FUND CO THE BOSTON FOUNDATION$25,047,906
DANA-FARBER INC$4,060,000
SOCIAL FINANCE$1,000,000
UPSTREAM USA$1,000,000
YEAR UP INC$540,000
FOCUSING PHILANTHROPY$537,000
YOUTH VILLAGES$500,000
MILFORD PUBLIC SCHOOLS$445,500
ST VINCENT'S MEDICAL CENTER$425,000
WALTHAM PUBLIC SCHOOLS$402,750
DUET INC$300,000
TEACH FOR AMERICA - MA$250,000
CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER$250,000
HORIZONS FOR HOMELESS CHILDREN$250,000
NEW ENGLAND AQUARIUM$250,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $2.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 64% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%YOUTH VILLAGES: $500k → 8%YOUTH VILLAGES: $500k → 8%SOCIAL FINANCE: $1.0M → 16%HORIZONS FOR HOMELESS CHILDREN: $250k → 16%HORIZONS FOR HOMELESS CHILDREN: $250k → 16%HORIZONS FOR HOMELESS CHILDREN: $250k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 10% of Mellen Charitable Fdn (Fka Tf Fdn)’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 92% of the giving stays in MA; read by stated purpose it is 82% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Mellen Charitable Fdn (Fka Tf Fdn)lessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 2.3% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$44M · 11 repeat orgs$3.4M to everyone else

11 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
4

Total granted

$44M
$1.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-4%
+38%

Still filing today

91%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.1M went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesEducationPhilanthropyAnimalsEmploymentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FP
    FOCUSING PHILANTHROPY INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $1.5M · revenue +49%
  • YOUTH VILLAGES INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $1.0M · revenue +41%
  • HF
    HORIZONS FOR HOMELESS CHILDREN
    3× · 2022–2024 · $750k · revenue +27%

Funded once

  • JEWISH VOCATIONAL SERVICE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $500k · revenue +38%
  • UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF
    one grant, 2022 · $250k · revenue -21%
  • SB
    SAINT BONIFACE HAITI FOUND
    one grant, 2021 · $250k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

2
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

3
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
4
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
5
University of Virginia Investment Management Company

The university of virginia investment management company (uvimco) is organized to invest funds on behalf of the rector and visitors of the university of virginia (the university or uva) and university-associated organizations (uaos).

Education
6
University Health Inc

Primary functions are the coordination and delivery of health care resources and services, health care education for the hospital service area, long range analysis of health care needs and development of programs, and arranging for…

7
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
8
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
9
Highmark Health

As the parent entity of a blended health organization, highmark health seeks to improve the health and well-being of the people and communities it serves by providing affordable, accessible and high-quality healthcare.

Health
10
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

11
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
12
America's Health Insurance Plans Inc

Ahip is the national trade association representing the health insurance industry. ahip's members provide health care coverage, services and solutions to more than 200 million americans. we are committed to market-based solutions and…

Membership Benefit

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Teach for America Inc and the most unlike its peers is Cedars-Sinai Medical Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
6/14
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

JEROME AVENUE FUND CO THE BOSTON FOUNDATION — $26,037,906 · OtherJEROME AVENUE FUND CO THE BOSTON FOUNDATIONDANA-FARBER INC — $5,650,000 · OtherDANA-FARBER INC+6 more — $1,898,250 · Other+6 moreUpstream USA Inc — $3,000,000 · HealthUpstream USA…St Vincent's Medical Center — $1,525,000 · HealthSt Vincent's…CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER — $750,000 · HealthCEDARS-SINAI…YEAR UP INC — $2,160,000 · EducationTeach for America Inc — $1,300,000 · EducationYOUTH VILLAGES INC — $1,000,000 · Human ServicesSocial Finance Inc — $1,000,000 · Human ServicesHORIZONS FOR HOMELESS CHILDREN — $750,000 · Human ServicesFOCUSING PHILANTHROPY INC — $1,537,000 · PhilanthropyNEW ENGLAND AQUARIUM CORPORATION — $750,000 · AnimalsJEWISH VOCATIONAL SERVICE INC — $500,000 · Employment
Other$33,586,156Health$5,275,000Education$3,460,000Human Services$2,750,000Philanthropy$1,537,000Animals$750,000Employment$500,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetDANA-FARBER INC — $5,650,000 over 4y, 3.4% of budgetUpstream USA Inc — $3,000,000 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetYEAR UP INC — $2,160,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetFOCUSING PHILANTHROPY INC — $1,537,000 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetSt Vincent's Medical Center — $1,525,000 over 3y, 8.2% of budgetTeach for America Inc — $1,300,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetYOUTH VILLAGES INC — $1,000,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSocial Finance Inc — $1,000,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetHORIZONS FOR HOMELESS CHILDREN — $750,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetNEW ENGLAND AQUARIUM CORPORATION — $750,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER — $750,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH VOCATIONAL SERVICE INC — $500,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetDUET INC — $300,000 over 1y, 9.4% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF — $250,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston IncMA13.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc · Boston Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Mellen Charitable Fdn (Fka Tf Fdn) funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 12%
  • Jewish Vocational Service Inc39% of income from government
  • Horizons for Homeless Children21% of income from government
  • New England Aquarium Corporation12% of income from government
  • Social Finance Inc12% of income from government
  • Upstream Usa Inc4% of income from government
  • Year Up Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Mellen Charitable Fdn (Fka Tf Fdn)?

Find your warmest path to Mellen Charitable Fdn (Fka Tf Fdn) through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph