Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Texas Academy Family Phys Foundation

The texas academy of family physicians foundation supports educational and scientific initiatives for the specialty of family practice to improve the health of all americans.

$224k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Health$259k
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 6 grants below total $70,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $224,023 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $154,023 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$4.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BAYOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE$20,000
UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER$10,000
UTMB GALVESTON$10,000
WACO FAMILY MEDICINE RES$10,000
UTHSC SAN ANTONIO$10,000
MEMORIAL FAMILY MEDICINE RESIDENCY$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 81% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%MEMORIAL FAMILY MEDICINE RESIDENCY: $10k → 8%Tarrant County Hospital District: $10k → 11%Heart of Texas Community Health Center: $10k → 12%UTMB GALVESTON: $10k → 14%UT Southwestern Medical Center: $10k → 14%UTHSC SAN ANTONIO: $10k → 16%WACO FAMILY MEDICINE RES: $10k → 16%Baylor College of Medicine: $6k → 16%University of North Texas HSC: $8k → 11%Heart of Texas Community Health Center: $7k → 12%Heart of Texas Community Health Center: $9k → 14%UT Southwestern Medical Center: $10k → 14%UT Health Science Center at San Antonio - Office of Sponsored Prg: $10k → 16%University of North Texas HSC: $5k → 11%Heart of Texas Community Health Center: $5k → 12%UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER: $10k → 14%UT Health Science Center SA: $10k → 16%UT Southwestern Medical Center: $10k → 14%UT Health Science Center at San Antonio - Office of Sponsored Prg: $8k → 16%UT Southwestern Medical Center: $7k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 6% of Texas Academy Family Phys Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in TX; read by stated purpose it is 96% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Texas Academy Family Phys Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$199k · 8 repeat orgs$59k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
4

Total granted

$199k
$39k

Still filing today

50%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HO
    HEART OF TEXAS COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC
    4× · 2020–2025 · $42k · revenue +17%
  • BC
    Baylor College of Medicine
    3× · 2021–2025 · $42k · revenue +32%
  • UH
    UTMB HEALTHCARE SYSTEMS INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $30k · revenue 0%

Funded once

  • TC
    TARRANT COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • TU
    THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTE
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • UO
    University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston
    one grant, 2021 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field
05the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
3/6
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UT Health Science Center at San Antonio - Office of Sponsored Prg — $17,500 · OtherUT Health Science Center at San Antonio - Office o…UT Southwestern Medical Center — $17,469 · OtherUT Southwestern Medical CenterUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER HOUSTON — $17,306 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER HOUSTONUniversity of North Texas HSC — $13,639 · OtherUniversity of North Texas HSCTARRANT COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT — $10,000 · OtherTARRANT COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICTTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTE — $10,000 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTEUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT SAN ANTONIO ALUMNI ASSOCIATION — $10,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT SAN ANTONIO ALUMNI ASSOCIAT…University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston — $9,813 · OtherUniversity of Texas Medical Branch at GalvestonTHE UNIV OF TX HEALTH SCIENCE CTR OF SA — $9,522 · OtherTHE UNIV OF TX HEALTH SCIENCE CTR OF SAHEART OF TEXAS COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC — $41,876 · HealthHEART OF TEXAS COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INCUTMB HEALTHCARE SYSTEMS INC — $30,000 · HealthUTMB HEALTHCARE SYSTEMS INCUT SOUTHWESTERN HEALTH SYSTEMS — $20,000 · HealthUT SOUTHWESTERN HEALTH SYSTEMSMemorial Hermann Health System — $10,000 · HealthMemorial Hermann Health SystemBaylor College of Medicine — $41,540 · EducationBaylor College of …
Other$115,249Health$101,876Education$41,540

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHEART OF TEXAS COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC — $41,876 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBaylor College of Medicine — $41,540 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUTMB HEALTHCARE SYSTEMS INC — $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUT SOUTHWESTERN HEALTH SYSTEMS — $20,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetMemorial Hermann Health System — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HEART OF TEXAS COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC
  • Who funds Baylor College of Medicine
  • Who funds UTMB HEALTHCARE SYSTEMS INC
  • Who funds UT SOUTHWESTERN HEALTH SYSTEMS
  • Who funds Memorial Hermann Health System
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT SAN ANTONIO ALUMNI ASSOCIATION

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Texas Academy Family Phys Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Texas Academy Family Phys Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Texas Academy Family Phys Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph