Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Tevanian Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$215k
Granted FY2017
11
Grants FY2017
4
States reached
$50k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Tevanian Family Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2017, the last year Tevanian Family Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 9 organizations, $215k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

9
17
8
18
8
19
8
20
0
21
0
22
0
23
0
24
0
25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Philanthropy$1.5MEducation$608kScience & Tech$160kHealth$150kEnvironment$47kHuman Services$40kArts & Culture$30k
02FY2017 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2017

  • Under $10k1 grant · $2k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $113k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $100k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$7.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SANTA CLARA UNIVERSITY$50,000
STANFORD HEALTH CARE$50,000
COMPUTER HISTORY MUSEUM$40,000
READING PARTNERS$12,500
CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY$10,000
STANFORD WOMEN'S CANCER PROGRAM$10,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE$10,000
UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER$10,000
SHELBY'S SAFESPACE$10,000
MONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM$10,000
RAYMOND WATERWAY PROTECTIVE ASSN$2,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 50% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY: $20k → 11%SHELBY'S SAFESPACE: $15k → 7%RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $10k → 8%READING PARTNERS: $13k → 10%MONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM: $10k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $100k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER: $10k → 14%RAYMOND WATERWAY PROTECTIVE ASSN: $2k → 7%CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY: $20k → 11%SHELBY'S SAFESPACE: $15k → 7%RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $10k → 8%READING PARTNERS: $10k → 10%MONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM: $10k → 12%ARMENIAN AMERICAN MUSEUM: $10k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER: $10k → 14%RAYMOND WATERWAY PROTECTIVE ASSN: $2k → 7%CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY: $10k → 11%SHELBY'S SAFESPACE: $10k → 7%RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $10k → 8%READING PARTNERS: $10k → 10%MONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM: $10k → 12%ARMENIAN AMERICAN MUSEUM: $10k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER: $10k → 14%RAYMOND WATERWAY PROTECTIVE ASSN: $2k → 7%SHELBY'S SAFESPACE: $10k → 7%RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $10k → 8%READING PARTNERS: $10k → 10%MONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM: $10k → 12%ARMENIAN AMERICAN MUSEUM: $10k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER: $10k → 14%RAYMOND WATERWAY PROTECTIVE ASSN: $1k → 7%STANFORD HEALTH CARE: $50k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $100k → 14%STANFORD UNDER ONE UMBRELLA FUND: $25k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $100k → 14%STANFORD UNDER ONE UMBRELLA FUND: $25k → 8%STANFORD UNDER ONE UMBRELLA FUND: $25k → 8%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $25k → 8%STANFORD WOMEN'S CANCER PROGRAM: $20k → 8%STANFORD WOMEN'S CANCER PROGRAM: $20k → 8%SANTA CLARA UNIVERSITY: $50k → 8%STANFORD WOMEN'S CANCER PROGRAM: $10k → 8%COMPUTER HISTORY MUSEUM: $40k → 8%COMPUTER HISTORY MUSEUM: $40k → 8%COMPUTER HISTORY MUSEUM: $40k → 8%COMPUTER HISTORY MUSEUM: $40k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$610k · 11 repeat orgs$100k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2017, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2017 (too recent to call). Read against FY2017, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
2

Total granted

$610k
$100k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+81%
+96%

Still filing today

73%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
EducationArts & CultureHealthAnimalsEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    COMPUTER HISTORY MUSEUM
    4× · 2017–2020 · $160k · revenue +93%
  • CM
    Carnegie Mellon University
    4× · 2017–2020 · $75k · revenue +15%
  • RP
    READING PARTNERS
    4× · 2017–2020 · $43k · revenue +1%

Funded once

  • PO
    PRESIDENT-BOARD OF TRUSTEES SANTA CLARA COLLEGEgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $50k · revenue +39%
  • SH
    STANFORD HEALTH CAREgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $50k · revenue +96%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
2
Southern California University of Health Sciences

The mission of southern california university of health sciences (scu) is to educate students as competent, caring and successful practitioners of integrative healthcare. the university is committed to providing excellence in academics,…

Education
3
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
4
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
5
Lowell Observatory

The mission of lowell observatory is to pursue the study of astronomy, especially the study of our solar system and its evolution; to conduct pure research in astronomical phenomena; and to maintain quality public education and outreach…

Science & Tech
6
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
7
William Marsh Rice University

As a leading research university with a distinctive commitment to undergraduate education, Rice University aspires to path breaking research, unsurpassed teaching, and contributions to the betterment of our world. It seeks to fulfill this…

Education
8
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
9
Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania

The trustees of the university of pennsylvania (the "university") sees itself as having a public service mission. in such regard, the university aims to provide a rich and diverse educational environment for its students; to pioneer…

Education
10
Marshall B Ketchum University

To educate caring, inspired health care professionals who are prepared to deliver collaborative, patient-centric health care in an interprofessional environment.

Education
11
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
12
Pomona College

Throughout its history, pomona college has educated men and women of exceptional promise. we gather individuals, regardless of financial circumstances, into a small residential community that is strongly rooted in southern california yet…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Carnegie Mellon University and the most unlike its peers is Raymond Waterways Protective Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
10/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND — $1,451,996 · Community ImprovementFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUNDUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $300,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHE…PRESIDENT-BOARD OF TRUSTEES SANTA CLARA COLLEGE — $50,000 · EducationPRESIDENT-BOARD OF T…READING PARTNERS — $42,500 · EducationREADING PARTNERSUNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER — $40,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF ROCHES…THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $25,000 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEE…Carnegie Mellon University — $75,000 · OtherCarnegie M…STANFORD UNDER ONE UMBRELLA FUND — $75,000 · OtherSTANFORD U…STANFORD WOMEN'S CANCER PROGRAM — $50,000 · OtherSTANFORD W…RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE — $40,000 · OtherRONALD MCD…COMPUTER HISTORY MUSEUM — $160,000 · Arts & CultureArmenian American Museum and Cultural Center of California — $30,000 · Arts & CultureSAFESPACE CENTER INC — $50,000 · HealthSTANFORD HEALTH CARE — $50,000 · HealthMONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM FOUNDATION — $40,000 · AnimalsRAYMOND WATERWAYS PROTECTIVE ASSOCIATION — $7,000 · Environment
Community Improvement$1,451,996Education$457,500Other$240,000Arts & Culture$190,000Health$100,000Animals$40,000Environment$7,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND — $1,451,996 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $300,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOMPUTER HISTORY MUSEUM — $160,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetCarnegie Mellon University — $75,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPRESIDENT-BOARD OF TRUSTEES SANTA CLARA COLLEGE — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTANFORD HEALTH CARE — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREADING PARTNERS — $42,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER — $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM FOUNDATION — $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetArmenian American Museum and Cultural Center of California — $30,000 over 3y, 6.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRAYMOND WATERWAYS PROTECTIVE ASSOCIATION — $7,000 over 4y, 1.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Tevanian Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2017, released 2017. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph