Loading…
· Public charity
TERENCE J O'SULLIVAN LIUNA CHARITABLE
Financial assistance to non-profits and members
$1.3M
Granted FY2024
11
Grants
8
Communities
$350k
Largest
01What you fund
0188% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2018–2024.
Health$3.7MEducation$1.8MHuman Services$525kPhilanthropy$140kOther$850k
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2018
—
2019
treatmentpreventiondiseasesmiamichildrendiabetes
2020
healthmiamidiabeteschildren
2021
miamichildrendiabetes
2022
miamichildrendiabetes
2023
treatmentmilitarymiamichildrendiabetes
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2024 · 11 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k3 grants · $75k
- $50k–250k6 grants · $560k
- $250k+2 grants · $600k
$100,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$5.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
- LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY$350,000
- JOHNS HOPKINS KIMMEL CANCER CENTER$250,000
- MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF AMERICA$150,000
- DIABETES RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOUNDATION INC$100,000
- FOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION$100,000
- TRAGEDY ASSISTANCE PROGRAM FOR SURVIVORS$100,000
- OPERATION WARM INC$60,000
- ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL$50,000
- THE THERAPY LEARNING CENTER$30,000
- THE BUONICONTI FUND TO CURE PARALYSIS$25,000
- THE YELLOW RIBBON FUND INC$20,000
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $525k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8% — the area typically sits at 10%. 40% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$6.9M · 12 repeat orgs$125k to everyone else
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +45% since the first grant, against +12% for the ones you funded once.
12 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
12
2
Total granted
$6.9M
$125k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+45%
+12%
Still filing today
100%
100%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
HealthEducationHuman ServicesPhilanthropyOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
JOHNS HOPKINS KIMMEL CANCER CENTER7× · 2018–2024 · $1.6M · revenue +45%
MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF AMERICA6× · 2019–2024 · $850k · revenue +35%- TATRAGEDY ASSISTANCE PROGRAM FOR SURVIVORS5× · 2020–2024 · $500k · revenue +19%
Funded once
MARCH OF DIMESone grant, 2020 · $100k · revenue -41%- JDJUVENILE DIABETES RESEARCH FOUNDATION INT'Lone grant, 2019 · $25k · revenue +12%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Clinic
Advancing health through research, education, clinical practice, and community partnerships; providing each person the best care in the right place, at the right time, every time.
Health
2
Marc Lustgarten Pancreatic Cancer
The lustgarten foundation is the largest private funder of pancreatic cancer research in the world.the lustgarten foundation is the largest private funder of pancreatic cancer research in the world, funding preeminent pancreatic cancer…
Human Services
3
Arc Research Institute
Our mission is to accelerate scientific progress and understand the root causes of complex diseases. This challenge requires researchers across many disciplines to study fundamental biological mechanisms, develop new technologies, and…
Health
4
Benaroya Research Institute At Virginia
To advance the science that will predict, prevent, reverse, and cure diseases of the immune system.
Health
5
The Multiple Myeloma Research
The multiple myeloma research foundation (mmrf) is the largest nonprofit in the world solely focused on accelerating acurefor multiple myeloma patient. we drive the development and delivery of next-generation therapies, leverage data to…
Health
6
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group
Susan g. komen's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.
—
7
Northwell Health Inc
Northwell Health is the parent company of a fully integrated health system that is committed to caring for the community regardless of ability to pay.
Community Improvement
8
Lenox Hill Hospital
LENOX HILL STRIVES TO IMPROVE THE HEALTH of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality of care for the COMMUNITY REGARDLESS OF ABILITY TO PAY.
Health
9
The John Merck Fund
—
10
Northwell Health Foundation
Foundation's mission is to solicit, receive and administer funds to be used for major modernization and other health care related services for northwell health, inc.
Health
11
Long Island Jewish Medical Center
LIJMC strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality of care for the community regardless of ability to pay.
Health
12
American Diabetes Association
The mission of the American Diabetes Association the Association is to prevent and cure diabetes and to improve the lives of all people affected by diabetes.
Health
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Jude Children's Research Hospital and the most unlike its peers is Make-a-Wish Foundation of America. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
14 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
10/14
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Health$3,740,000Education$1,800,000Other$850,000Human Services$525,000Philanthropy$140,000
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS KIMMEL CANCER CENTER ↗
- Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds DIABETES RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds TRAGEDY ASSISTANCE PROGRAM FOR SURVIVORS ↗
- Who funds OPERATION WARM INC ↗
- Who funds THE THERAPY LEARNING CENTER ↗
- Who funds FOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ST JUDE CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds THE BUONICONTI FUND TO CURE PARALYSIS ↗
- Who funds THE YELLOW RIBBON FUND INC ↗
- Who funds MARCH OF DIMES ↗
- Who funds JUVENILE DIABETES RESEARCH FOUNDATION INT'L ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION ↗
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation TERENCE J O'SULLIVAN LIUNA CHARITABLE funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: THE THERAPY LEARNING CENTER.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
low risk
~170 months of operating runway; revenue contracted over 8 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 371290825 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on THE THERAPY LEARNING CENTER, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 170 months of cash on hand.
- WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue contracted over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 35% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Terence J O'Sullivan Liuna Charitable?
Find your warmest path to Terence J O'Sullivan Liuna Charitable through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines