Skip to content

· Private foundation

Tepas Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$286k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$61k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Public Benefit$361kHealth$202kEducation$152kFood & Nutrition$103kRecreation & Sports$85kInternational$30kReligion$23kPhilanthropy$16kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $215k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $61k
$15,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$5.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MIAMI UNIVERSITY$61,000
TURNING POINT USA$30,000
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL$25,000
BREAKTHROUGH T1D$20,000
FOOD ALLERGY RESEARCH & EDUCATION INC$20,000
NATIONAL BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION$15,000
THE CATO INSTITUTE$15,000
GREEN BERET FOUNDATION$15,000
THE LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE$15,000
THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION$15,000
LUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION PANCREATIC CANCER RESEARCH$15,000
JUDICIAL WATCH INC$15,000
BROOKFIELD ZOO$15,000
GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY$5,000
TEAM NELSON$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 70% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%TURNING POINT USA: $30k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA: $25k → 15%CHARLOTTE & GWENYTH GRAY FOUNDATION: $15k → 14%LUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION PANCREATIC CANCER RESEARCH: $15k → 6%NATIONAL BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION: $15k → 5%JUDICIAL WATCH INC: $20k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $26k → 10%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $25k → 17%MIAMI UNIVERSITY: $61k → 12%BARRINGTON HIGH SCHOOL HORSESHOE CLUB: $80k → 6%BREAKTHROUGH T1D: $20k → 14%FOOD ALLERGY RESEARCH & EDUCATION INC: $20k → 6%THE LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE: $20k → 7%TURNING POINT USA: $15k → 11%JUDICIAL WATCH INC: $15k → 14%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $15k → 17%MIAMI UNIVERSITY: $25k → 12%JUVENILE DIABETES RESEARCH FOUNDATION INTERNATIONAL: $15k → 14%FOOD ALLERGY RESEARCH & EDUCATION INC: $20k → 6%THE LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE: $15k → 7%TURNING POINT USA: $15k → 11%JUDICIAL WATCH INC: $15k → 14%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $15k → 17%MIAMI UNIVERSITY: $15k → 12%JUVENILE DIABETES RESEARCH FOUNDATION INTERNATIONAL: $13k → 14%FOOD ALLERGY RESEARCH & EDUCATION INC: $20k → 6%THE LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE: $11k → 7%JUDICIAL WATCH INC: $15k → 14%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $13k → 17%JUVENILE DIABETES RESEARCH FOUNDATION INTERNATIONAL: $11k → 14%FOOD ALLERGY RESEARCH & EDUCATION INC: $15k → 6%JUDICIAL WATCH INC: $13k → 14%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $11k → 17%JUVENILE DIABETES RESEARCH FOUNDATION INTERNATIONAL: $10k → 14%FOOD ALLERGY RESEARCH & EDUCATION INC: $13k → 6%JUDICIAL WATCH INC: $11k → 14%FOOD ALLERGY RESEARCH & EDUCATION INC: $11k → 6%THE CATO INSTITUTE: $11k → 14%THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $20k → 14%THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $15k → 14%BROOKFIELD ZOO: $15k → 14%THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $15k → 14%THE CATO INSTITUTE: $15k → 14%THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $15k → 14%THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $13k → 14%CAPITAL RESEARCH CENTER: $10k → 14%THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $11k → 14%THE CATO INSTITUTE: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
WI
NY
OH
CA
CO
VA
AZ
TN
DC
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 36% of Tepas Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Tepas Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$709k · 13 repeat orgs$229k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +17% since the first grant, against +4% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
8

Total granted

$709k
$164k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+4%

Still filing today

69%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $65k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthPublic BenefitFood & NutritionEducationPhilanthropyAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JUDICIAL WATCH INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $88k · revenue +16%
  • THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $88k · revenue +12%
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    5× · 2020–2025 · $78k · revenue +78%

Funded once

  • BH
    BARRINGTON HS HORSESHOE CLUB
    one grant, 2023 · $80k · revenue +19%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $26k · revenue +39%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA
    one grant, 2024 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Rand Corporation

Help improve policy and decision making through research and analysis.

Public Benefit
2
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…

International
3
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
4
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
5
National Opinion Research Center

See schedule onorc at the university of chicago conducts research and data science on critical societal issues to guide decision-making and the development of programs and public policy. our experts identify relationships and trends, and…

Social Science
6
The California Medical Innovations Institute Inc

The Institute is a scientific research center dedicated to conducting basic and applied research to advance the understanding of human disease and the improvement of human health. The Institute fosters an innovative research environment…

Education
7
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
8
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
9
Foreign Policy Research Institute

The foreign policy research institute (frpi) is dedicated to producing the highest quality scholarship and nonpartisan policy analysis focused on crucial foreign policy and national security challenges facing the united states. we educate…

International
10
Institute for Protein Innovation Inc

The institute for protein innovation is advancing protein science to accelerate research and improve human health.

Health
11
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

—
12
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Heritage Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Team Nelson Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
12/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MIAMI UNIVERSITY: $101,000 · OtherMIAMI UNIVERSITYBARRINGTON HS HORSESHOE CLUB: $80,000 · OtherBARRINGTON HS HORSESHOE CLUBTURNING POINT USA INC: $75,375 · OtherTURNING POINT USA INCJUVENILE DIABETES RESEARCH FOUNDATION INTERNATIONAL: $48,300 · OtherJUVENILE DIABETES RESEARCH FOUNDATION INTERN…UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA: $25,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF ARIZONASoul City Incorporated: $20,250 · OtherLUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION PANCREATIC CANCER RESEARCH: $15,000 · OtherGREEN BERET FOUNDATION: $15,000 · Other+4 more: $12,719 · OtherJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $88,300 · Public BenefitJUDICIAL WATCH INCTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $88,300 · Public BenefitTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATIONLeadership Institute: $59,425 · Public BenefitLeadership InstituteCATO INSTITUTE: $49,425 · Public BenefitCATO INSTITUTEST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $78,300 · HealthST JUDE CHILDRE…BREAKTHROUGH T1D: $25,000 · HealthBREAKTHROUGH T1…The Charlotte and Gwenyth Gray Foundation: $15,000 · HealthThe Charlotte a…NATIONAL BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 · HealthNATIONAL BREAST…NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $5,250 · HealthFOOD ALLERGY RESEARCH & EDUCATION INC: $98,300 · Food & NutritionFOOD ALLERG…GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $5,000 · Food & NutritionUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $26,000 · EducationTeam Nelson Inc: $20,125 · EducationCAPITAL RESEARCH CENTER: $16,375 · PhilanthropyChicago Zoological Society: $15,000 · AnimalsWORLD VISION INC: $10,000 · International
Other$392,644Public Benefit$285,450Health$138,550Food & Nutrition$103,300Education$46,125Philanthropy$16,375Animals$15,000International$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFOOD ALLERGY RESEARCH & EDUCATION INC: $98,300 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $88,300 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $88,300 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $78,300 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTURNING POINT USA INC: $75,375 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLeadership Institute: $59,425 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCATO INSTITUTE: $49,425 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $26,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTeam Nelson Inc: $20,125 over 5y, 7.4% of budgetCAPITAL RESEARCH CENTER: $16,375 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetThe Charlotte and Gwenyth Gray Foundation: $15,000 over 1y, 5.9% of budgetNATIONAL BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetChicago Zoological Society: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD VISION INC: $10,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $5,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE INDEPENDENT INSTITUTE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FOOD ALLERGY RESEARCH & EDUCATION INC ↗
  • Who funds JUDICIAL WATCH INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BARRINGTON HS HORSESHOE CLUB ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds TURNING POINT USA INC ↗
  • Who funds Leadership Institute ↗
  • Who funds CATO INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D ↗
  • Who funds Team Nelson Inc ↗
  • Who funds CAPITAL RESEARCH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds The Charlotte and Gwenyth Gray Foundation ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Chicago Zoological Society ↗
  • Who funds WORLD VISION INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds THE INDEPENDENT INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Tepas Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Tepas Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Tepas Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph