Skip to content

· Public charity

Tennis for Hope Inc

Our mission is to inspire compassion, foster connection, and empower individuals and communities to make a positive impact while assisting individuals and organizations impacted by natural and other disasters through the common bond of tennis.

$218k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$56k
Largest
01What it funds
01FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 7 grants below total $197,500, the rows itemized in this filing. The $218,195 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $20,695 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k6 grants · $142k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $56k
$25,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$205k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CAMP LA JUNTA FUND CO SAN ANTONIO AREA FOUNDATION$56,000
CAMP HONEY CREEK FOR GIRLS SUMMER DREAMS$29,000
TREASURE BAY CO USTA FLORIDA SECTION FOUNDATION INC$25,000
PALISADES TENNIS CENTER$25,000
PLANT CITY CO USTA FLORIDA SECTION FOUNDATION INC$25,000
VILLAGE RISING$22,500
CITY OF ASHEVILLE - ASTON PARK$15,000
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY25–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%VILLAGE RISING: $23k → 14%CAMP HONEY CREEK FOR GIRLS SUMMER DREAMS: $29k → 13%CAMP LA JUNTA FUND CO SAN ANTONIO AREA FOUNDATION: $56k → 16%TREASURE BAY CO USTA FLORIDA SECTION FOUNDATION INC: $25k → 12%PLANT CITY CO USTA FLORIDA SECTION FOUNDATION INC: $25k → 13%CITY OF ASHEVILLE - ASTON PARK: $15k → 12%PALISADES TENNIS CENTER: $25k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field
03the grantee network

4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 6 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
4/4
Grantees still filing
3/4
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SAN ANTONIO AREA FOUNDATION: $56,000 · PhilanthropySAN ANTONIO AREA FOUNDATIONUSTA Florida Section Foundation Inc: $50,000 · PhilanthropyUSTA Florida Section Foundation IncPLAYERS PHILANTHROPY FUND INC: $22,500 · PhilanthropyPLAYERS PHILANTHROPY FUND INCPALISADES TENNIS CENTER: $25,000 · OtherPALISADES TENNIS CENTE…CITY OF ASHEVILLE - ASTON PARK: $15,000 · OtherCITY OF ASHEVILLE - AS…SUMMER DREAMS INC: $29,000 · Recreation & SportsSUMMER DREAMS IN…
Philanthropy$128,500Other$40,000Recreation & Sports$29,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUSTA Florida Section Foundation Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 5.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 6 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Tennis for Hope’s filings →

More from the funding graph