Skip to content

Utah · Private foundation

Ted and Norma H Warthen Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$148k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
26
Grants FY2025
14
Organizations funded FY2024
93%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$5,500
Largest grant, FY2025
$20,000
Organizations funded a year
1 to 15
FY2017 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
1
Total assets, FY2025
$1.8M
Applications
Takes unsolicited applications
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 93% of the organizations Ted and Norma H Warthen Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 91% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 9% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $78k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’22’23’24
Food & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving26$169k96%
FY202414$85k93%
FY20236$77k100%
FY20223$10k100%
FY20202$8k100%
FY20191$7k100%
FY201810$35k90%
FY201715$41kn/a
97% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$329kFood & Nutrition$50kInternational$15kArts & Culture$8kReligion$3kHuman Services$2kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Tan's Treats Inc$42,500310%
The Sharing Place$20,00012%
Utah Food Bank$7,50010%
Amethyst Center for Healing$5,00011%

Plus 70 recipients with no EIN on record ($359k), not named here.

Compare Ted and Norma H Warthen Foundation with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Ted and Norma H Warthen Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Ted and Norma H Warthen Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Ted and Norma H Warthen Foundation

How much does Ted and Norma H Warthen Foundation give?
Ted and Norma H Warthen Foundation reported 26 grants totaling $148,152 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 1 and 15 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2024.
What does Ted and Norma H Warthen Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Health (76%), Food & Nutrition (12%), International (3%).
Who are Ted and Norma H Warthen Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: Tan's Treats Inc ($43k), The Sharing Place ($20k), Utah Food Bank ($8k).
Does Ted and Norma H Warthen Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 93% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Ted and Norma H Warthen Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.
Where is Ted and Norma H Warthen Foundation based?
Ted and Norma H Warthen Foundation is based in UT.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 74 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ted and Norma H Warthen’s filings →

More from the funding graph