Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ted & Fran Friedman Charitable Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$45k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$140kFood & Nutrition$132kHealth$11kPublic Safety & Disaster$5kReligion$3kHuman Services$1kEmployment$200International$200Other$0
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $40k
$20,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$6k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE SMITH CENTER$20,000
THREE SQUARE$20,000
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 80% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Paws with a Cause: $1k → 10%Paws with a Cause: $100 → 10%NATHAN ADELSON HOSPICE: $2k → 13%NATHAN ADELSON HOSPICE: $1k → 13%Nathan Adelson Hospice: $500 → 13%Nathan Adelson Hospice: $1k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$286k · 6 repeat orgs$7k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
6

Total granted

$286k
$2k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+41%

Still filing today

83%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesInternationalArts & CultureFood & NutritionHealthEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TS
    The Smith Center for the Performing Arts
    9× · 2017–2025 · $140k · revenue +41%
  • TS
    THREE SQUARE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $132k · revenue +9%
  • PANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $6k · revenue +24%

Funded once

  • AO
    An Ounce of Prevention Inc
    one grant, 2018 · $500
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $360
  • OV
    OPPORTUNITY VILLAGE
    one grant, 2019 · $200 · revenue +9%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
California Dental Association

The california dental association is committed to the success of our members in service to their patients and the public.

Community Improvement
2
National Investment Center for Seniors Housing & Care Inc

To enable the access and choice of america's seniors in their housing and care by providing data, analytics and connections that bring together investors and providers in the sector.

Human Services
3
Commonwealth Care Alliance Inc

Commonwealth care alliance, inc.'s mission is to improve the health and well-being of people with significant needs by innovating, coordinating and providing the highest quality, individualized care.

Health
4
National Committee for Quality Assurance

Our mission: to improve the quality of health care.our vision: better health care. better choices. better health.

Health
5
National Comprehensive Cancer Network

To define and advance quality, effective, equitable, and accessible cancer care and prevention so all people can live better lives.

Health
6
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
7
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
8
Salem Health Hospitals & Clinics

To support salem health, salem health west valley and related organizations.

—
9
Worldwide Vets Incorporated

Our goal is to sustainably improve animal welfare, provide veterinary care, and improve veterinary education globally. in order to achieve this goal, we work in over 10 countries, across 5 continents, supporting local people and animals,…

Animals
10
Midwest Dairy Association

Midwest dairy works with others to give consumers an excellent dairy experience increasing sales, fostering innovation, and inspiring consumer confidence of dairy products and practices.

—
11
Emanate Health

Our mission is to help people keep well in body, mind, and spirit by providing quality health care services in a safe, compassionate environment.

Health
12
People Inc

People inc. provides health and human services that enrich lives and communities through innovation and supportive services. with a goal to help people achieve greater independence and quality of life, people inc. provides day,…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pancreatic Cancer Action Network Inc; the most unlike its peers is Opportunity Village. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
8/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

The Smith Center for the Performing Arts: $140,000 · Arts & CultureThe Smith Center for the Performing ArtsTHREE SQUARE: $132,000 · Food & NutritionTHREE SQUAREPANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC: $6,000 · HealthNathan Adelson Hospice Inc: $4,500 · Human ServicesPaws With A Cause: $1,100 · Human ServicesWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $5,000 · InternationalHIAS INC: $200 · InternationalMISERICORDIA HEART OF MERCY: $2,500 · OtherAn Ounce of Prevention Inc: $500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $360 · OtherDESERT SPRING CHURCH: $200 · Other+1 more: $100 · OtherOPPORTUNITY VILLAGE: $200 · Employment
Arts & Culture$140,000Food & Nutrition$132,000Health$6,000Human Services$5,600International$5,200Other$3,660Employment$200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Smith Center for the Performing Arts: $140,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetTHREE SQUARE: $132,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetPANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC: $6,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNathan Adelson Hospice Inc: $4,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPaws With A Cause: $1,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOPPORTUNITY VILLAGE: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHIAS INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The Smith Center for the Performing Arts ↗
  • Who funds THREE SQUARE ↗
  • Who funds PANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds Nathan Adelson Hospice Inc ↗
  • Who funds Paws With A Cause ↗
  • Who funds OPPORTUNITY VILLAGE ↗
  • Who funds HIAS INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ted & Fran Friedman Charitable Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ted & Fran Friedman Charitable Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 88%
  • Hias Inc: 88% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ted & Fran Friedman’s filings →

More from the funding graph