Skip to content
Teamconnor Childhood Cancer Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Teamconnor Childhood Cancer Foundation

The TEAMCONNOR CHILDHOOD CANCER FOUNDATION's mission is to raise funds for national childhood cancer research programs, to build awareness of childhood cancer, and to support inpatient programs.

$267k
Granted FY2023
10
Grants FY2023
7
States reached
$109k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2023.

Health$1.8M
02FY2023 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k4 grants · $34k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $70k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $159k
$13,676
Median grant
7
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OSTEOSARCOMA INSTITUTE$109,000
ST BALDRICK'S FOUNDATION$50,000
PENN STATE HEALTH CHILDREN'S$25,000
STANFORD HEALTH FOUNDATION$19,892
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL PHILADELPHIA$13,676
MONROE CASRELL JR CHILDREN'S$11,189
UCSF BENIOFF$9,946
ORLANDO HEALTH ARNOLD PALMER$8,703
COOK CHILDREN'S HEALTH FOUNDATION$8,703
JOHNS HOPKINS CHILDRENS$6,216
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%COOK CHILDREN'S HEALTH FOUNDATION: $9k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ND
NY
MA
OH
PA
CA
MD
TN
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

43%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$760k · 6 repeat orgs$1.0M to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2023, 4 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
8

Total granted

$760k
$833k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+62%
+64%

Still filing today

83%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 29% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $187k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23
HealthPhilanthropyHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION
    3× · 2020–2022 · $200k · revenue +159%
  • CC
    Cook Children's Medical Center
    2× · 2020–2022 · $185k · revenue +73%
  • CH
    CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER
    2× · 2020–2021 · $125k · revenue +36%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO
    one grant, 2020 · $200k
  • TC
    Texas Children's Hospitalgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $153k · revenue +69%
  • CC
    CINCINNATI CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER
    one grant, 2022 · $100k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
2
Children's Hospital & Research Center At Oakland

The mission of children's hospital & research center at oakland is to protect and advance the health and well-being of children through clinical care, teaching and research.

Health
3
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
4
Phoenix Children's Hospital Foundation

Phoenix children's hospital foundation supports phoenix children's hospital through fundraising ensuring that the hospital continues to stay on the leading edge of pediatric medicine and is equipped to fulfill its mission to advance hope,…

Health
5
East Tennessee Children's Hospital Association Inc

East tennessee children's hospital is a free-standing, independent, not-for-profit pediatric health care system which serves the east tennessee region. children's hospital is certified by the state of tennessee as a comprehensive regional…

Health
6
Variety Children's Hospital

To inspire hope and promote lifelong health by providing the best care to every child.

Health
7
Beth Israel Hospital & Children's Hospital Medical Care Corporation

Pediatric healthcare, education & research

—
8
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
9
Methodist Healthcare-Memphis Hospitals

Methodist le bonheur healthcare, in partnership with its medical staffs, will collaborate with patients and their families to be the leader in providing high quality, cost-effective patient-and family-centered care. services will be…

Health
10
Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago

Ann & robert h. lurie children's hospital of chicago is dedicated to the health and well-being of all children. as the pediatric teaching facility for northwestern university feinberg school of medicine, this commitment drives us to be a…

Health
11
Children's Hospital Colorado

To improve the health of children through the provision of high-quality, coordinated programs of patient care, education, research and advocacy.

Health
12
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Hospital Medical Center; the most unlike its peers is Charity Navigator. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
16/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION: $199,582 · HealthTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATIONCook Children's Medical Center: $185,000 · HealthCook Children's Medical CenterTexas Children's Hospital: $152,978 · HealthTexas Children's HospitalCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER: $125,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTERTHE OSTEOSARCOMA INSTITUTE: $109,000 · HealthTHE OSTEOSARCOMA INSTITUTEPenn State Health: $100,000 · HealthPenn State HealthMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $100,000 · HealthMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTERDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $100,000 · HealthDana-Farber Cancer Institute IncCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION: $55,000 · HealthWI Cook Foundation Inc: $50,000 · Health+5 more: $49,730 · HealthUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO: $200,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SA…CINCINNATI CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER: $100,000 · OtherCINCINNATI CHILDREN'S HOSPI…THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTE: $74,976 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOU…PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY: $50,000 · OtherPENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSI…ST BALDRICK'S FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 · PhilanthropyCANDID: $19,892 · PhilanthropyCharity Navigator: $8,703 · Human Services
Health$1,226,290Other$424,976Philanthropy$119,892Human Services$8,703

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION: $199,582 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCook Children's Medical Center: $185,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTexas Children's Hospital: $152,978 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER: $125,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE OSTEOSARCOMA INSTITUTE: $109,000 over 1y, 8.0% of budgetST BALDRICK'S FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetPenn State Health: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $100,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION: $55,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWI Cook Foundation Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCANDID: $19,892 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA: $13,676 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVanderbilt University Medical Center: $11,189 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL & RESEARCH CNTR FNDN: $9,946 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCharity Navigator: $8,703 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetOrlando Health Foundation Inc: $8,703 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS ALL CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL INC: $6,216 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America C…Fidelity Investments …
The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC8.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Teamconnor Childhood Cancer Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Teamconnor Childhood Cancer Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Teamconnor Childhood Cancer Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Teamconnor Childhood Cancer Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Teamconnor Childhood Cancer’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home