Skip to content

· Private foundation

TBDB Foundation Inc

Its FY2020 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$980k
Granted FY2020
4
Grants FY2020
3
States reached
$810k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

83% of TBDB Foundation Inc’s FY2020 grant dollars went to Schwab Charitable Fund, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2020 names 2 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

3
’17
3
’18
1
’19
2
’20

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2020.

Philanthropy$810kEducation$515kHealth$6k
02FY2020 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2020

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $160k
  • $250k+1 grant · $810k
$100,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Schwab Charitable Fund$809,695
Noble and Greenough School$100,000
Williams College$60,000
The Wharton School - University of Pennsylvania$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–20) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%Boston College: $4k → 7%Amherst Football Program: $25k → 12%Williams College: $60k → 12%Squash Smarts - The Clifton G Wright Memorial Scholarship: $6k → 22%St George School: $10k → 7%Noble and Greenough School: $100k → 7%Amherst Football Program: $25k → 12%Williams College: $30k → 12%The Wharton School - University of Pennsylvania: $10k → 22%Noble and Greenough School: $100k → 7%Williams College: $30k → 12%The Wharton School - University of Pennsylvania: $10k → 22%Noble and Greenough School: $50k → 7%The Wharton School - University of Pennsylvania: $10k → 22%Noble and Greenough School: $41k → 7%The Wharton School - University of Pennsylvania: $10k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$501k · 4 repeat orgs$20k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +87% since the first grant, against +70% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2020, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
3

Total granted

$501k
$20k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+87%
+70%

Still filing today

50%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NOBLE AND GREENOUGH SCHOOL
    4× · 2017–2020 · $291k · revenue +29%
  • Williams College
    3× · 2017–2020 · $120k · revenue +87%
  • AF
    Amherst Football Program
    2× · 2018–2019 · $50k

Funded once

  • SG
    ST GEORGE'S SCHOOLgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +36%
  • SS
    Squash Smarts - The Clifton G Wright Memorial Scholarship
    one grant, 2017 · $6k
  • TRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGEgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $4k · revenue +70%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 8 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/5
Grantees still filing
5/5
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC: $809,695 · PhilanthropyDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INCNOBLE AND GREENOUGH SCHOOL: $291,153 · EducationNOBLE AND GREENOUGH SCHOOLWilliams College: $120,000 · EducationWilliams College+2 more: $14,000 · EducationAmherst Football Program: $50,000 · OtherThe Wharton School - University of Pennsylvania: $40,000 · OtherSquash Smarts - The Clifton G Wright Memorial Scholarship: $6,000 · Other
Philanthropy$809,695Education$425,153Other$96,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC: $809,695 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNOBLE AND GREENOUGH SCHOOL: $291,153 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetWilliams College: $120,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetST GEORGE'S SCHOOL: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC ↗
  • Who funds NOBLE AND GREENOUGH SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds Williams College ↗
  • Who funds ST GEORGE'S SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization TBDB Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from TBDB Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • Trustees of Boston College: 3% of income from government
  • Williams College: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on TBDB’s filings →

More from the funding graph