Skip to content

· Public charity

Tash Inc

To serve the poor, especially those who need healthcare as well as to help children who need a safe environment to grow and mature in oaxaca, mexico.

$474k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$18k
Largest
01What it funds
01FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 2 grants below total $24,700, the rows itemized in this filing. The $473,550 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $448,850 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $7k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $18k
$17,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$5.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FRIENDS OF THE POOR$17,500
OAXACA YOUTH EMPOWERMENT$7,200
02The need
02

Where the grant dollars land

Across the US and around the world.

Grants abroad, by region: $418k on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 1 region. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

North America (Canada and Mexico)$418k · 100% · 5 grants

Stated purpose: LA CLNICA, THE HOSPITAL FOUNDED BY FATHER SCOTT, IS A CENTRAL PART OF TASH'S MISSION, AND WE CONSISTENTLY PROVIDE SUPPORT TO ENSURE IT CAN CONTINUE SERVING THOSE IN NEED. THE HOSPITAL IS DEDICATED TO DELIVERING AFFORDABLE, HIGH-QUALITY HEALTHCARE TO LOW-INCOME, INDIGENOUS, AND OTHERWISE UNDERSERVED POPULATIONS. IN ADDITION TO COMPREHENSIVE MEDICAL SERVICES, LA CLNICA ALSO OFFERS A FREE, ON-SITE HOSTEL FOR PATIENTS' FAMILIES, HELPING TO REMOVE BARRIERS TO CARE AND SUPPORT PATIENTS THROUGHOUT THEIR TREATMENT. · TO PROVIDE COMPREHENSIVE CARE, INCLUDING FOOD, EDUCATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL SUPPORT, AND RECREATION FOR FAMILIES FACING POVERTY, AIMING TO IMPROVE THEIR QUALITY OF LIFE THROUGH EDUCATION. · TO SUPPORT MEDICAL, DENTAL, AND DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES PROMOTING DIGNIFIED LIVING AND SOCIAL JUSTICE IN RURAL MIXTECA COMMUNITIES.

How this is measured
Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its field
03the grantee network

2 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
2/2
Grantees still filing
0/2
Grew since first funded

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFRIENDS OF THE POOR: $17,500 over 1y, 5.4% of budgetOAXACA YOUTH EMPOWERMENT INC: $7,200 over 1y, 0.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Tash Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Tash Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Tash Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Tash Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 2 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Tash’s filings →

    More from the funding graph