Skip to content

· Private foundation

T J Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$54k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What it funds
0185% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$96kHealth$93kFood & Nutrition$59kEnvironment$26kArts & Culture$350Other$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $42k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $12k
$5,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$706k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FOOD BANK OF NORTHEWEST IN$12,000
LUMEN CRISTI HIGH SCHOOL$8,515
ST MARY SCHOOL$7,500
FRANCIAN HEALTH FOUNDATION$5,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$5,000
STUDENT CONSERVATION ASSOCIATES$5,000
BIG BEND CONSERVANCY$5,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
NATL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY$1,000
ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 88% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $5k → 17%BIG BEND CONSERVANCY: $5k → 14%AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION: $1k → 14%LUMEN CRISTI HIGH SCHOOL: $9k → 13%CENTRAL MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY: $10k → 19%DEATH WITH DIGNITY: $1k → 12%MULT-MYELOMA RESCH FDTN: $1k → 9%FRANCIAN HEALTH FOUNDATION: $6k → 15%NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $1k → 16%AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION: $1k → 14%PULMONARY HYPERTENSION: $1k → 8%STUDENT CONSERVATION ASSOCIATES: $5k → 10%PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $5k → 17%LUMEN CRISTI HIGH SCHOOL: $3k → 13%CENTRAL MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY: $7k → 19%FRANCIAN HEALTH FOUNDATION: $5k → 15%STUDENT CONSERVATION ASSOCIATES: $4k → 10%PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $5k → 17%LUMEN CRISTI HIGH SCHOOL: $2k → 13%CENTRAL MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY: $4k → 19%FRANCIAN HEALTH FOUNDATION: $5k → 15%STUDENT CONSERVATION ASSOCIATES: $3k → 10%PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $5k → 17%FRANCIAN HEALTH FOUNDATION: $5k → 15%STUDENT CONSERVATION ASSOCIATES: $2k → 10%PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $4k → 17%ST MARY SCHOOL: $10k → 13%FRANCIAN HEALTH FOUNDATION: $5k → 15%STUDENT CONSERVATION ASSOCIATES: $2k → 10%ST MARY SCHOOL: $8k → 13%FRANCIAN HEALTH FOUNDATION: $5k → 15%ST MARY SCHOOL: $8k → 13%FRANCIAN HEALTH FOUNDATION: $5k → 15%JACKSON COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $5k → 13%FRANCIAN HEALTH FOUNDATION: $5k → 15%ST MARY SCHOOL: $5k → 13%FOOD BANK OF NORTHEWEST IN: $12k → 15%ST MARY SCHOOL: $5k → 13%FOOD BANK OF NORTHEWEST IN: $12k → 15%ST MARY SCHOOL: $5k → 13%FOOD BANK OF NORTHEWEST IN: $12k → 15%ST MARY SCHOOL: $5k → 13%FOOD BANK OF NORTHEWEST IN: $12k → 15%ST MARY SCHOOL: $3k → 13%FOOD BANK OF NORTHEWEST IN: $11k → 15%FRANCIAN HEALTH FOUNDATION: $5k → 15%SPRING ARBOR UNIVERSITY: $4k → 13%SPRING ARBOR UNIVERSITY: $4k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
IN
CT
MD
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$285k · 18 repeat orgs$3k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
2

Total granted

$285k
$2k

Still filing today

22%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AH
    American Heart Association Inc
    8× · 2017–2025 · $8k · revenue +33%
  • SA
    Spring Arbor University
    2× · 2023–2024 · $8k · revenue +29%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF BIG BEND NATIONAL PARK
    2× · 2024–2025 · $6k · revenue +134%

Funded once

  • LC
    LUMEN CHRISTI HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2018 · $1k
  • NM
    NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY
    one grant, 2019 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
4/4
Grantees still filing
4/4
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FOOD BANK OF NORTHEWEST IN: $59,000 · OtherFOOD BANK OF NORTHEWEST INST MARY SCHOOL: $47,500 · OtherST MARY SCHOOLFRANCIAN HEALTH FOUNDATION: $46,000 · OtherFRANCIAN HEALTH FOUNDATIONPLANNED PARENTHOOD: $26,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOODCENTRAL MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY: $21,700 · OtherCENTRAL MICHIGAN UNIVERSITYSTUDENT CONSERVATION ASSOCIATES: $20,000 · OtherSTUDENT CONSERVATION ASSOCIATESLUMEN CRISTI HIGH SCHOOL: $13,165 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $9,000 · Other+9 more: $18,634 · Other+9 moreAmerican Heart Association Inc: $8,000 · HealthNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $5,000 · HealthSpring Arbor University: $7,821 · EducationFRIENDS OF BIG BEND NATIONAL PARK: $6,000 · Philanthropy
Other$260,999Health$13,000Education$7,821Philanthropy$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $8,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSpring Arbor University: $7,821 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF BIG BEND NATIONAL PARK: $6,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds Spring Arbor University ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF BIG BEND NATIONAL PARK ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization T J Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from T J Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on T J’s filings →

    More from the funding graph