Skip to content

· Private foundation

Sylvia & Howard G Minksy Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$12k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$46kArts & Culture$25kPublic Benefit$2kHuman Services$2kEnvironment$2kCommunity Improvement$1kEducation$930Food & Nutrition$706Other$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$300
Median grant
2
States reached
$149k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$5,000
LINCOLN CENTER$3,000
Individual grant recipient$1,500
FILM AT LINCOLN CENTER$810
Individual grant recipient$400
DORST$360
DOROT$300
WORLD WILDLIFE FUND$250
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$150
FRESH AIR FUND$100
Individual grant recipient$100
FUNDME AMERICA$100
MEALS ON WHEELS$100
ASPC$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $785) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%DORST: $360 → 17%DOROT: $300 → 17%DOROT: $125 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 99% of Sylvia & Howard G Minksy Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 92% of the giving stays in NY; by stated purpose, 0%.

Sylvia & Howard G Minksy Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

39%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$31k · 9 repeat orgs$49k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
29

Total granted

$31k
$41k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+42%

Still filing today

56%
21%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 30% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureAnimalsEducationEnvironmentHuman ServicesFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TH
    THE HAMPTONS INTERNATIONAL FILM FESTIVAL INC
    2× · 2018–2020 · $7k · revenue +16%
  • WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC
    3× · 2019–2025 · $2k · revenue +47%
  • DI
    DOROT INC
    2× · 2019–2025 · $785 · revenue +44%

Funded once

  • V
    VARIOUS
    one grant, 2017 · $15k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Humane Association

Founded in 1877, american humane association, dba american humane society (american humane) is committed to ensuring the safety, welfare and well-being of animals. our leadership programs are first to serve in promoting and nurturing the…

Animals
2
World Animal Protection

World animal protection is a global organization working to end factory farming and wildlife exploitation. we expose cruel systems, promote animal-friendly alternatives, and influence policy change. for over 75 years, we've been rewriting…

Animals
3
Animal Wellness Action

To prevent cruelty to animals, we promote enacting and enforcing good public policies. enacting good laws depends upon electing good lawmakers, and we remind voters which candidates care about and support animal issues.

Human Services
4
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
5
Wildlife Conservation Society

The wildlife conservation society (wcs) saves wildlife and wild places worldwide through science, conservation action, education, and inspiring people to value nature.

Animals
6
Denver Zoological Foundation

Inspiring communities to save wildlife for future generations.

Animals
7
American Friends of the International Foundation Mozarteum
International
8
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
9
Sweet Farm Foundation

Sweet farm is the world's first nonprofit sanctuary to address the devastating impact that factory farming has on climate change from the perspective of animals, plants, and the planet. we must first understand how these pieces are…

Animals
10
Humane World for Animals International

HUMANE WORLD FOR ANIMALS INTERNATIONAL, FKA HUMANE SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL (HSI), works around the globe to promote the human-animal bond, rescue and protect dogs and cats, improve farm animal welfare, protect wildlife, promote animal-free…

Animals
11
Four Paws International Inc

Our vision is a world where humans treat animals with respect, empathy and understanding. four paws mission is to be the strong, global and independent voice for animals.

Animals
12
Municipal Art Society of New York

The municipal art society of new york (mas) lifts up the voices of the people in the debates that shape new york's built environment and leads the way to a more livable city from sidewalk to skyline. mas envisions a future in which all new…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Indian College Fund; the most unlike its peers is Ace Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
7/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

VARIOUS: $15,055 · OtherVARIOUSIndividual grant recipient: $8,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHE HAMPTONS INTERNATIONAL FILM FESTIVAL INC: $7,000 · OtherTHE HAMPTONS INTERNATIONAL FILM FESTIVAL INCIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFILM LINCOLN CENTER: $3,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $2,600 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $2,500 · Other+30 more: $12,277 · Other+30 moreFILM AT LINCOLN CENTER INC: $8,675 · Arts & CultureFILM AT LINCOLN …LINCOLN CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC: $3,000 · Arts & CultureLINCOLN CENTER F…WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $1,500 · EnvironmentDOROT INC: $785 · Human ServicesAMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND: $500 · EducationAce Foundation Inc: $450 · PhilanthropyCITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS: $306 · Food & Nutrition
Other$65,432Arts & Culture$11,675Environment$1,500Human Services$785Education$500Philanthropy$450Food & Nutrition$306

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFILM AT LINCOLN CENTER INC: $8,675 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HAMPTONS INTERNATIONAL FILM FESTIVAL INC: $7,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetLINCOLN CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL REALTY CLUB INC: $1,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetDOROT INC: $785 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAce Foundation Inc: $450 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS: $306 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FILM AT LINCOLN CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HAMPTONS INTERNATIONAL FILM FESTIVAL INC ↗
  • Who funds LINCOLN CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL REALTY CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds DOROT INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND ↗
  • Who funds Ace Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds CITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS ↗
  • Who funds PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sylvia & Howard G Minksy Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sylvia & Howard G Minksy Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Sylvia & Howard G Minksy’s filings →

    More from the funding graph