Skip to content

· Private foundation

Sybil Trent Nieporent Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$4k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Food & Nutrition$21kHealth$8kEducation$6kArts & Culture$2kReligion$2kCommunity Improvement$1kHuman Services$710Youth Development$600
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
2
States reached
$8k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TABLE TO TABLE INC$1,600
CITY HARVEST INC$500
NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR PEOPLE WITH$500
SELFHELP COMMUNITY SERVICES FOUNDAT$500
STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE AT BROCKPO$500
HOT BREAD KITCHEN$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 4% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%HOT BREAD KITCHEN: $250 → 17%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $50 → 14%NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR PEOPLE WITH: $2k → 7%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $50 → 14%NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR PEOPLE WITH: $1k → 7%NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR PEOPLE WITH: $1k → 7%NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR PEOPLE WITH: $1k → 7%NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR PEOPLE WITH: $1k → 7%NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR PEOPLE WITH: $1k → 7%NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR PEOPLE WITH: $1k → 7%NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR PEOPLE WITH: $500 → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$40k · 10 repeat orgs$4k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +64% since the first grant, against +9% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
4

Total granted

$40k
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+64%
+9%

Still filing today

60%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Food & NutritionHuman ServicesPublic Safety & DisasterEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TT
    TABLE TO TABLE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $14k · revenue +103%
  • CITY HARVEST INC
    7× · 2017–2025 · $9k · revenue +75%
  • NI
    NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES OF NEW JERSEY
    8× · 2017–2025 · $8k · revenue +57%

Funded once

  • KJ
    KAPLEN JCC ON THE PALISADES
    one grant, 2022 · $2k
  • NT
    NYC TOURISM FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $500
  • TC
    THE CITY COLLEGE FUND
    one grant, 2017 · $250 · revenue -69%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York Common Pantry

New york common pantry reduces hunger while promoting dignity, health and self-sufficiency.

Food & Nutrition
2
Food Bank for New York City

Food bank for nyc has been the city's major hunger-relief organization driven by our mission to empower every new yorker to achieve food security for good. we harness the collective power of our network of food providers, partners, and…

Community Improvement
3
Community Kitchen Pittsburgh

Community kitchen pittsburgh is a nonprofit food service company. because poverty, food insecurity and employment are entwined issues, we work across these focus areas, engaging in the following activities: "culinary based workforce…

Food & Nutrition
4
Edible Schoolyard New York

Edible schoolyard nyc is on a mission to make edible education accessible for every child in nyc. we believe edible education-where kids experience hands-on cooking and gardening helps kids gain the skills to contribute to a healthy and…

Education
5
Workforce Professionals Training Institute

Wpti's mission is to build the capacities of people, programs, and organizations that provide job training, placement, and career guidance for individuals and to advocate for policies that promote economic opportunities for all.

Employment
6
Citymeals-On-Wheels

Citymeals-on-wheels provides a continuous lifeline of nutritious food and human company to homebound elderly new yorkers, helping them live with dignity in their own familiar homes and communities. 100% of all public donations are used for…

Food & Nutrition
7
United Way of New York City

Uwnyc works with a coalition of trusted partners to unite community power with citywide possibility. together, we meet today's most urgent needs while building transformative solutions for tomorrow - striving for health, opportunity, and…

Philanthropy
8
Island Harvest Ltd

The mission of island harvest is to end hunger and reduce food waste on long island.

Human Services
9
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
10
The Friends of Crown Heights Educational Centers Inc

To provide a safe, affordable and comprehensive program of high-quality early childhood education, parental and family support, as well as academic enrichment and recreational programs.

Human Services
11
Nashville Food Project Inc

The nashville food project brings people together to grow, cook, and share nourishing food to cultivate community and alleviate hunger. through community food access, agriculture, education, and strategic partnerships, we work toward a…

Food & Nutrition
12
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is God's Love We Deliver Inc; the most unlike its peers is Wounded Warrior Project Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
8/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TABLE TO TABLE INC: $14,150 · Food & NutritionTABLE TO TABLE INCCITY HARVEST INC: $9,000 · Food & NutritionCITY HARVEST INC+1 more: $100 · Food & NutritionSUNY COLLEGE AT BROCKPORT FOUNDATIO: $5,250 · OtherSUNY COLLEGE AT BROCKPORT …KAPLEN JCC ON THE PALISADES: $2,000 · OtherKAPLEN JCC ON THE PALISADE…NYC HOSPITALITY ALLIANCE: $750 · OtherNYC HOSPITALITY ALLIANCEGREATER NEW YORK COUNCILS BOY SCOUT: $600 · OtherGREATER NEW YORK COUNCILS …SELFHELP COMMUNITY SERVICES FOUNDAT: $500 · OtherNYC TOURISM FOUNDATION: $500 · OtherSTATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE AT BROCKPO: $500 · Other+2 more: $360 · OtherNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES OF NEW JERSEY: $8,000 · Human ServicesNATIONAL INSTITUTE FO…+2 more: $350 · Human ServicesNEW YORK CITY TOURISM FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 · EducationTUESDAY'S CHILDREN: $500 · Public Safety & Disaster
Food & Nutrition$23,250Other$10,460Human Services$8,350Education$2,000Public Safety & Disaster$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTABLE TO TABLE INC: $14,150 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCITY HARVEST INC: $9,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES OF NEW JERSEY: $8,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK CITY TOURISM FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTUESDAY'S CHILDREN: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CITY COLLEGE FUND: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TABLE TO TABLE INC ↗
  • Who funds CITY HARVEST INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES OF NEW JERSEY ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK CITY TOURISM FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds TUESDAY'S CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds THE CITY COLLEGE FUND ↗
  • Who funds HOT BREAD KITCHEN LTD ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds GOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sybil Trent Nieporent Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sybil Trent Nieporent Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Sybil Trent Nieporent’s filings →

More from the funding graph