Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Sybil & Robert Sheinkopf Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$13k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
0194% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Health$220kInternational$110kReligion$100kAnimals$50kPublic Benefit$30kPhilanthropy$30kArts & Culture$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $3k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$39k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CAPE COD SYNAGOGUE$10,000
JEWISH FEDERATION OF S PALM BEACH$2,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–21, $35k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR: $10k → 6%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR: $10k → 6%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR: $10k → 6%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER: $5k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

71%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$452k · 10 repeat orgs$188k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
9

Total granted

$452k
$185k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
+114%

Still filing today

30%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalHuman ServicesHealthArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IG
    ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND
    4× · 2017–2021 · $35k · revenue +36%
  • CF
    Central Fund of Israel
    2× · 2017–2020 · $30k · revenue +145%
  • RE
    RESEARCH - EVAL - PROMOTING ORG RESPON & TRANSPARENCY - REPORT - INC
    2× · 2019–2020 · $30k · revenue +14%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $100k
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF ISRAEL DISABLED VETERANS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $15k · revenue +114%
  • FF
    FIDV FRIENDS OF DISABLED VETRANS
    one grant, 2019 · $15k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Idf Memorial Foundation
Philanthropy
2
Sherit Isroel
3
Israel Initiative 2020 Inc
International
4
American Friends of Ish El Rayahu

To promote, benefit, and support Jewish religious, charitable & educational activities in Israel and the USA.

Religion
5
University of Judaism Foundation
6
American Friends of Israel Emergency Aid Fund

To provide funding for medical and humanitarian projects throughout israel. the organization might make grants to other organizations providing such services, including, but not limited to, evp israel and israel emergency aid fund, israeli…

Public Safety & Disaster
7
Voices United for Israel

Educational information regarding Israel and the Middle East.

International
8
Israel Select Charity Fund Inc

Helping individuals and organizations with great needs and little resources and with often few options.

Human Services
9
Physicians for Palestine
Health
10
The Israel Independence Fund

To raise and distribute funds for charitable organizations with the goal to strengthen the jewish and zionist spirit of the state of israel.

Philanthropy
11
Us Israel Education Fund Inc
12
Israel Medical Fund Corp

To provide guidance and support to families with ill or physically disabled family members

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pef Israel Endowment Funds Inc and the most unlike its peers is Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CAPE COD HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION — $110,000 · OtherCAPE COD HEALTHCARE FOUNDATIONMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED — $105,000 · OtherMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATEDIndividual grant recipient — $100,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCAPE COD SYNAGOGUE INC — $55,000 · OtherCAPE COD SYNAGOGUE INCIndividual grant recipient — $32,046 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFREINDS OF UNITED HATZALAH — $30,000 · OtherFREINDS OF UNITED HATZALAH+6 more — $62,810 · Other+6 moreCentral Fund of Israel — $30,000 · InternationalCentral Fund of…RESEARCH - EVAL - PROMOTING ORG RESPON & TRANSPARENCY - REPORT - INC — $30,000 · InternationalRESEARCH - EVAL…FRIENDS OF ISRAEL DISABLED VETERANS INC — $15,000 · InternationalFRIENDS OF ISRA…Adi Israel Foundation Inc — $10,000 · InternationalAdi Israel Foun…AMERICAN FRIENDS OF LIBI INC — $10,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIEND…PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC — $30,000 · PhilanthropyTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC — $12,000 · PhilanthropyISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND — $35,000 · Human ServicesFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC — $10,000 · Arts & CultureDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — $5,000 · Health
Other$494,856International$95,000Philanthropy$42,000Human Services$35,000Arts & Culture$10,000Health$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND — $35,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC — $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCentral Fund of Israel — $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRESEARCH - EVAL - PROMOTING ORG RESPON & TRANSPARENCY - REPORT - INC — $30,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetFRIENDS OF ISRAEL DISABLED VETERANS INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC — $12,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAdi Israel Foundation Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF LIBI INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND
  • Who funds PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC
  • Who funds Central Fund of Israel
  • Who funds RESEARCH - EVAL - PROMOTING ORG RESPON & TRANSPARENCY - REPORT - INC
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF ISRAEL DISABLED VETERANS INC
  • Who funds THE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC
  • Who funds Adi Israel Foundation Inc
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF LIBI INC
  • Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Sybil & Robert Sheinkopf Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 7%
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph