Skip to content

Montana · Public charity

Swan Valley Connections

Maintain the swan valley's unique natural resources and ensure that a vibrant human community can sustain itself through stewardship, education, economic viability, and conservation on public and private lands.

$143k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
3
Itemized grants FY2025
3
Organizations funded FY2024
100%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2025
$36k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2025
$10,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$18,400
Organizations funded a year
2 to 3
FY2018 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
2
Total assets, FY2025
$1.9M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 100% of the organizations Swan Valley Connections funded were first-time grantees, receiving 100% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $82k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
Public BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving3$36k33%
FY20243$82k100%
FY20233$110k67%
FY20222$19k100%
FY20212$46k100%
FY20182$17kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Environment$310k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2018 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Red Owl Mt LLC$96,1251n/a
Mt Nc Land Company LLC$68,8002n/a
R&E Associates of Montana LLC$38,4001n/a
Crc Land Improvement$27,9503n/a
West Swan Shores Road Association Inc$25,5001n/a
Euchre Mountain Logging Inc$10,0001n/a
Crane Mountain Estates Landowners Association$9,8401n/a
Heritage Ridge Holdings LP$7,7001n/a
1221 Anastasia LLC$7,0201n/a
Tnt Land Management$6,7781n/a
Show all 12 grantees
All grantees of Swan Valley Connections by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Red Owl Mt LLC$96,1251n/a
Mt Nc Land Company LLC$68,8002n/a
R&E Associates of Montana LLC$38,4001n/a
Crc Land Improvement$27,9503n/a
West Swan Shores Road Association Inc$25,5001n/a
Euchre Mountain Logging Inc$10,0001n/a
Crane Mountain Estates Landowners Association$9,8401n/a
Heritage Ridge Holdings LP$7,7001n/a
1221 Anastasia LLC$7,0201n/a
Tnt Land Management$6,7781n/a
Snowflake Land Ventures LLC$6,4001n/a
Big Hawk Hoa$5,4001n/a

Compare Swan Valley Connections with peer funders

About Swan Valley Connections

How much does Swan Valley Connections give?
Swan Valley Connections reported 3 itemized grants totaling $36,400, out of $143,228 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 2 and 3 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.
What does Swan Valley Connections fund?
By grant dollars over FY2018 to FY2025, its largest causes are Environment (100%).
Who are Swan Valley Connections's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2018 to FY2025: Red Owl Mt LLC ($96k), Mt Nc Land Company LLC ($69k), R&E Associates of Montana LLC ($38k).
Does Swan Valley Connections fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 100% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Where is Swan Valley Connections based?
Swan Valley Connections is based in MT.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Swan Valley Connections’ filings →

More from the funding graph