Skip to content
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants: funding profile →

California · Public charity

Sutter Central Valley Hospitals

Mission statement: SUTTER CENTRAL VALLEY HOSPITALS provide high-quality, compassionate care to each patient, while exercising prudent fiscal responsibility. SUTTER CENTRAL VALLEY HOSPITALS is a not-for-profit organization that exists to maintain and improve the health status of the communities of greater stanislaus county, san joaquin…

$153k
Granted FY2017
2
Itemized grants FY2017
2
Organizations funded FY2017
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2017
$150k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2017
$124,581
Largest grant, FY2017
$124,581
States reached, FY2017
1

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2017, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Valley Consortium for Medical Education$124,58112%
Dentist Organized for Veterans$25,0001n/a

Compare Sutter Central Valley Hospitals with peer funders

About Sutter Central Valley Hospitals

How much does Sutter Central Valley Hospitals give?
Sutter Central Valley Hospitals reported 2 itemized grants totaling $149,581, out of $153,181 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2017 IRS filing.
What does Sutter Central Valley Hospitals fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2017, its largest causes are Employment (83%), Health (17%).
Who are Sutter Central Valley Hospitals's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2017: Valley Consortium for Medical Education ($125k), Dentist Organized for Veterans ($25k).
Where is Sutter Central Valley Hospitals based?
Sutter Central Valley Hospitals is based in CA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 2 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2017, released 2017. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home