Skip to content

· Private foundation

Sutherland Foundation

Its FY2021 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$45k
Granted FY2020
13
Grants FY2020
3
States reached
$10k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

97% of Sutherland Foundation’s FY2021 grant dollars went to Christian Community Foundation Of Memphis And The Mid-South Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2021 names 5 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2020, the last year Sutherland Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 6 organizations, $45k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

6
’20
5
’21

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2021.

Philanthropy$711kArts & Culture$23kReligion$10kHuman Services$6kFood & Nutrition$4kPublic Benefit$2kYouth Development$2kAnimals$1kOther$0
02FY2020 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2020

  • Under $10k12 grants · $35k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$3,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Radiant Church$10,000
New Village Arts Theater$6,000
Marian E Smith Foundation$6,000
La Jolla Playhouse$4,000
Individual grant recipient$4,000
San Diego Rep Theater$3,000
YMCA of San Diego$3,000
San Diego Food Bank$2,000
Voice of San Diego$2,000
Boys and Girls Club$1,500
International Bipolar Foundation$1,000
Oceanside Community Theater$1,000
San Diego Zoo$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–21, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%YMCA OF SAN DIEGO: $3k → 11%YMCA of San Diego: $3k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$51k · 7 repeat orgs$18k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +35% since the first grant, against +3% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2020, 0 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call). Read against FY2020, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
8

Total granted

$51k
$18k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+3%

Still filing today

57%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21
Arts & CulturePhilanthropyHuman ServicesFood & NutritionHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ME
    MARIAN E SMITH FOUNDATION
    2× · 2020–2021 · $12k · revenue -39% · 48% of their budget
  • TA
    THEATER & ARTS FOUNDATION OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY DBA LA JOLLA PLAYHOUSE
    2× · 2020–2021 · $8k · revenue -57%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2020–2021 · $8k

Funded once

  • RC
    Radiant Church
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • VO
    VOICE OF SAN DIEGOgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $2k · revenue +97%
  • BA
    Boys and Girls Club
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
2
San Diego Coasters
Arts & Culture
3
Centro De San Juan Diego Foundation Inc Fka Douglas&Bennett Family Fdn
Philanthropy
4
San Francisco Jazz Organization

The san francisco jazz organization (the organization) is a recognized international leader in jazz creation, presentation, and education. the organization explores the full spectrum of jazz, from the music's origins in the african…

Arts & Culture
5
The Smd Foundation
Philanthropy
6
J M Smith Foundation
Philanthropy
7
Connect Foundation

Connect is an innovation instigator established to cultivate san diego's life science and tech communities. a trusted partner for more than 30 years, we propel our region's entrepreneurs as they create and scale their companies from…

Education
8
Maria Fisher Foundation
Philanthropy
9
Santa Fe Community Foundation

The santa fe community foundation inspires philanthropic generosity, strengthens nonprofits, and fosters positive change to build a more vibrant, healthy, and resilient region. the foundation's vision is a thriving northern new mexico,…

Philanthropy
10
San Diego County Citizens' Scholars Foundation
—
11
The Scripps Howard Foundation
Philanthropy
12
San Diego Parks Foundation

To improve the quality of life of communities throughout the city of San Diego through equitable investments in parks, greenspace, and recreational opportunities.Vison - Every San Diegan has access to quality recreational facilities as…

Recreation & Sports
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jacobs & Cushman San Diego Food Bank; the most unlike its peers is Marian E Smith Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF MEMPHIS: $483,976 · PhilanthropyCHRISTIAN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF MEMPHISNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $214,614 · PhilanthropyNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST+1 more: $12,000 · PhilanthropyRadiant Church: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $8,000 · OtherNew Village Arts Theater: $7,300 · OtherSan Diego Rep Theater: $6,000 · OtherBoys and Girls Club: $1,500 · Other+4 more: $3,060 · OtherTHEATER & ARTS FOUNDATION OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY DBA LA JOLLA PLAYHOUSE: $8,000 · Arts & CultureVOICE OF SAN DIEGO: $2,000 · Arts & CultureYMCA OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY: $6,000 · Human ServicesJACOBS & CUSHMAN SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK: $4,000 · Food & NutritionINTERNATIONAL BIPOLAR FOUNDATION: $1,000 · Health
Philanthropy$710,590Other$35,860Arts & Culture$10,000Human Services$6,000Food & Nutrition$4,000Health$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHRISTIAN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF MEMPHIS: $483,976 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $214,614 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARIAN E SMITH FOUNDATION: $12,000 over 2y, 48% of budgetTHEATER & ARTS FOUNDATION OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY DBA LA JOLLA PLAYHOUSE: $8,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetYMCA OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJACOBS & CUSHMAN SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCARLSBAD MUSIC FESTIVAL: $1,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetINTERNATIONAL BIPOLAR FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sutherland Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sutherland Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Sutherland Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Sutherland Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Sutherland’s filings →

    More from the funding graph