Skip to content
Supreme Council Benevolent Foundati Aasr at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Supreme Council Benevolent Foundati Aasr

To support research and the development of approaches to prevent, diagnose and treat schizophrenia and dyslexia.

$1.5M
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$450k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$4.2MHuman Services$3.9MMembership Benefit$3.3MArts & Culture$1.4MEducation$240kHealth$180kReligion$175k
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $1,020,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,455,450 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $435,450 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $65k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $150k
  • $250k+2 grants · $805k
$150,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$115M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHILDREN'S DYSLEXIA CENTERS INC$450,000
SCOTTISH RITE MASONIC MUSEUM AND LI$355,000
SUPREME COUNCIL$150,000
EDUCATION CHARITY TRUST$40,000
GRAND ALMONER FUND$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 1% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%123 RECIPIENTS OF ASSISTANCE: $2.3M → 8%BRAIN & BEHAVIOR RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $30k → 17%YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $30k → 12%INDIANA SCHOOL OF MEDICINE CO INDIANA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $30k → 16%115 RECIPIENTS OF ASSISTANCE: $1.6M → 8%BRAIN & BEHAVIOR RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $15k → 17%YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $15k → 12%INDIANA SCHOOL OF MEDICINE CO INDIANA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $15k → 16%SUPREME COUNCIL OF THE SOVEREIGN GRAND INSPECTORS GENERAL FOR THE NMJ: $771k → 8%BRAIN & BEHAVIOR RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $15k → 17%YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $15k → 12%INDIANA SCHOOL OF MEDICINE CO INDIANA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $15k → 16%SUPREME COUNCIL OF THE SOVEREIGN GRAND INSPECTORS GENERAL FOR THE NMJ: $735k → 8%CHILDREN'S DYSLEXIA CENTERS INC: $677k → 8%SUPREME COUNCIL OF THE SOVEREIGN GRAND INSPECTORS GENERAL FOR THE NMJ: $674k → 8%SUPREME COUNCIL OF THE SOVEREIGN GRAND INSPECTORS GENERAL FOR THE NMJ: $657k → 8%CHILDREN'S DYSLEXIA CENTERS INC: $537k → 8%CHILDREN'S DYSLEXIA CENTERS INC: $500k → 8%SUPREME COUNCIL OF THE SOVEREIGN GRAND INSPECTORS GENERAL FOR THE NMJ: $477k → 8%CHILDREN'S DYSLEXIA CENTERS INC: $450k → 8%CHILDREN'S DYSLEXIA CENTERS INC: $425k → 8%CHILDREN'S DYSLEXIA CENTERS INC: $425k → 8%SCOTTISH RITE MASONIC MUSEUM AND LIBRARY INC: $360k → 8%SCOTTISH RITE MASONIC MUSEUM AND LI: $355k → 8%SCOTTISH RITE MASONIC MUSEUM AND LIBRARY INC: $335k → 8%SCOTTISH RITE MASONIC MUSEUM AND LIBRARY INC: $335k → 8%32 SEPARATE ORGANIZATIONS: $254k → 8%CHILDREN'S DYSLEXIA CENTERS INC: $250k → 8%SUPREME COUNCIL: $150k → 8%34 SEPARATE ORGANIZATIONS: $145k → 8%34 SEPARATE ORGANIZATIONS: $141k → 8%35 SEPARATE ORGANIZATIONS: $121k → 8%SUPREME COUNCIL EDUCATION AND CHARITY FUND: $100k → 8%CHILDREN'S DYSLEXIA CENTERS INC: $100k → 8%CHILDREN'S DYSLEXIA CENTERS INC: $100k → 8%26 SEPARATE ORGANIZATIONS: $75k → 8%SUPREME COUNCIL EDUCATION AND CHARITY FUND: $50k → 8%SUPREME COUNCIL EDUCATION AND CHARITY FUND: $50k → 8%EDUCATION CHARITY TRUST: $40k → 8%GRAND ALMONER FUND: $25k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

63%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$8.4M · 7 repeat orgs$4.9M to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
5

Total granted

$8.4M
$4.3M

Still filing today

86%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 44% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $570k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationPhilanthropyArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CD
    CHILDREN'S DYSLEXIA CENTERS INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $3.5M · revenue +54%
  • SC
    SUPREME COUNCIL OF SOVEREIGN GRAND INSPECTORS GENERAL FOR THE NMJ
    5× · 2017–2021 · $3.3M · revenue +40%
  • SC
    SUPREME COUNCIL EDUCATION & CHARITY
    3× · 2022–2024 · $200k · revenue +86% · 43% of their budget

Funded once

  • 1R
    123 RECIPIENTS OF ASSISTANCE
    one grant, 2017 · $2.3M
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $1.6M
  • 3S
    32 SEPARATE ORGANIZATIONS
    one grant, 2021 · $254k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
6/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SUPREME COUNCIL OF SOVEREIGN GRAND INSPECTORS GENERAL FOR THE NMJ: $3,313,049 · OtherSUPREME COUNCIL OF SOVEREIGN GRAND INSPECTORS GENERAL FOR THE NMJ123 RECIPIENTS OF ASSISTANCE: $2,330,553 · Other123 RECIPIENTS OF ASSISTANCEIndividual grant recipient: $1,559,356 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSCOTTISH RITE MASONIC MUSEUM AND LI: $355,000 · Other34 SEPARATE ORGANIZATIONS: $285,963 · Other+7 more: $725,083 · Other+7 moreCHILDREN'S DYSLEXIA CENTERS INC: $3,463,358 · PhilanthropyCHILDREN'S DYSLEXIA CENTERS I…SCOTTISH RITE MASONIC MUSEUM AND LIBRARY INC: $1,029,590 · Arts & CultureSUPREME COUNCIL EDUCATION & CHARITY: $200,000 · EducationIndiana University Foundation: $60,000 · EducationYale University: $60,000 · Education
Other$8,569,004Philanthropy$3,463,358Arts & Culture$1,029,590Education$320,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHILDREN'S DYSLEXIA CENTERS INC: $3,463,358 over 9y, 21% of budgetSUPREME COUNCIL OF SOVEREIGN GRAND INSPECTORS GENERAL FOR THE NMJ: $3,313,049 over 5y, 13% of budgetSCOTTISH RITE MASONIC MUSEUM AND LIBRARY INC: $1,029,590 over 3y, 19% of budgetSUPREME COUNCIL EDUCATION & CHARITY: $200,000 over 3y, 43% of budgetNATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR RESEARCH ON SCHIZOPHRENIA AND DEPRESSION: $60,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetIndiana University Foundation: $60,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetYale University: $60,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHILDREN'S DYSLEXIA CENTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds SUPREME COUNCIL OF SOVEREIGN GRAND INSPECTORS GENERAL FOR THE NMJ ↗
  • Who funds SCOTTISH RITE MASONIC MUSEUM AND LIBRARY INC ↗
  • Who funds SUPREME COUNCIL EDUCATION & CHARITY ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR RESEARCH ON SCHIZOPHRENIA AND DEPRESSION ↗
  • Who funds Indiana University Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Yale University ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Supreme Council Benevolent Foundati Aasr funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Supreme Council Benevolent Foundati Aasr. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Yale University: 12% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Supreme Council Benevolent Foundati Aasr?

Find your warmest path to Supreme Council Benevolent Foundati Aasr through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Supreme Council Benevolent Foundati Aasr’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home