Skip to content
Sunrise Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Sunrise Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$903k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$423k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Recreation & Sports$1.7MReligion$560kHuman Services$461kEducation$413kInternational$131kPhilanthropy$45kArts & Culture$40kPublic Safety & Disaster$12kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $6k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $90k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $384k
  • $250k+1 grant · $423k
$20,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$13M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HAPPY VILLAGE$423,000
WILLIAM JESSUP UNIVERSITY$200,000
Individual grant recipient$100,000
ANC CHURCH$84,000
LOVE & HOPE MISSION CORP$40,000
MISSION POINTE CHURCH$20,000
ZION MOUNTAIN FOUNDATION$10,000
COMPASSION INTERNATIONAL$10,000
TEMESCAL HERITAGE FOUNDATION$10,000
KIMBO FOUNDATION$3,000
KOREAN AMERICAN FOUNDATION$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $465k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $5k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $3k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $3k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 14%HAPPY VILLAGE: $423k → 14%HAPPY VILLAGE: $12k → 14%HAPPY VILLAGE: $6k → 14%HAPPY VILLAGE: $6k → 14%HAPPY VILLAGE: $3k → 14%HAPPY VILLAGE: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.5M · 15 repeat orgs$36k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
4

Total granted

$3.5M
$13k

Still filing today

53%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $23k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesPhilanthropyInternationalRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KF
    KIMBO FOUNDATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $1.7M · revenue +54% · 80% of their budget
  • HV
    HAPPY VILLAGE
    6× · 2020–2025 · $453k · revenue +28% · 56% of their budget
  • Compassion International Incorporated
    5× · 2020–2025 · $33k · revenue +16%

Funded once

  • NH
    NEW HOPE INTERNATIONAL
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • P
    PCC
    one grant, 2024 · $1k
  • K
    KASEC
    one grant, 2020 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Korean World Mission Council
Religion
2
Kim International Medical Volunteer Foundation Inc

To provide medical vouunteers where needed

Public Safety & Disaster
3
K J Choi Foundation
—
4
Mizutomo Kiko Foundation
Philanthropy
5
The Korean Library Foundation
Education
6
Foreign Mission Foundation
—
7
Jessica Yoon Ministries

Spread the Christianity

Religion
8
Kiani Foundation
Philanthropy
9
Kou Family Foundation Dba Cure for Pc Foundation
—
10
Kam Family Foundation
Philanthropy
11
Joyful Korean Community Church

The mission of the church is to go into the world and make disciples by declaring the gospel of Jesus Christ in the power of the Spirit and gathering these disciples into churches, that they might worship the Lord and obey his commands now…

Religion
12
The Kmz Foundation
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is World Vision Inc; the most unlike its peers is Kimbo Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

KIMBO FOUNDATION: $1,653,000 · OtherKIMBO FOUNDATIONWILLIAM JESSUP UNIVERSITY: $390,000 · OtherWILLIAM JESSUP UNIVERSITYINLAND CHURCH: $383,500 · OtherINLAND CHURCHIndividual grant recipient: $200,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientANC CHURCH: $107,000 · Other+9 more: $92,500 · OtherHAPPY VILLAGE: $453,000 · Human ServicesHAPPY VILLAGE+1 more: $12,000 · Human ServicesLOVE AND HOPE MISSION CORP: $80,000 · InternationalCompassion International Incorporated: $33,000 · InternationalWORLD VISION INC: $8,393 · InternationalZION MOUNTAIN FOUNDATION: $42,000 · PhilanthropyKOREAN AMERICAN FOUNDATION: $3,000 · PhilanthropyTEMESCAL HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $40,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$2,826,000Human Services$465,000International$121,393Philanthropy$45,000Recreation & Sports$40,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetKIMBO FOUNDATION: $1,653,000 over 6y, 80% of budgetHAPPY VILLAGE: $453,000 over 6y, 56% of budgetWILLIAM JESSUP UNIVERSITY: $390,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetLOVE AND HOPE MISSION CORP: $80,000 over 4y, 20% of budgetZION MOUNTAIN FOUNDATION: $42,000 over 6y, 4.8% of budgetTEMESCAL HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $40,000 over 4y, 14% of budgetDOORAE COMMUNITY MOVEMENT: $19,000 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $12,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD VISION INC: $8,393 over 4y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds KIMBO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HAPPY VILLAGE ↗
  • Who funds WILLIAM JESSUP UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds LOVE AND HOPE MISSION CORP ↗
  • Who funds ZION MOUNTAIN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TEMESCAL HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Compassion International Incorporated ↗
  • Who funds DOORAE COMMUNITY MOVEMENT ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds WORLD VISION INC ↗
  • Who funds KOREAN AMERICAN FOUNDATION ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sunrise Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sunrise Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Sunrise Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Sunrise Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Sunrise’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home