Skip to content
Sunder Mohan Tulsi Charitable Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Sunder Mohan Tulsi Charitable Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$32k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$14k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Religion$323kHealth$3k
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k8 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $14k
$2,119
Median grant
2
States reached
$102k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HINDU SOCIETY OF INLAND EMPIRE INC$13,657
SRI VENKATA KRISHNA KSHETRA TEMPLE$5,867
SHRI DAKSHINA MURTI-SHRI VISHWANATH SANYAS ASHRAM$3,000
MAHA GANPATI TEMPLE OF AZ (MGTOA)$2,501
Individual grant recipient$2,119
SAVC-SHRI RADHA RAMAN VEDIC TEMPLE$1,935
ISKCON-PHOENIX- RADHS KRISHNA TEMPLE$1,600
VISHNAV SAMAJ OF ARIZONA (VSAZ)-SHREENATHJI TEMPLE-$501
AUM SPIRITUAL CENTER INC$501
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 76% of grant dollars ($246k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 24% that went abroad ($80k) is mapped below.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ISKCON-PHOENIX- RADHS KRISHNA TEMPLE: $2k → 11%MAHA GANPATI TEMPLE OF AZ (MGTOA): $3k → 11%KRISHNA BHAKTI SEVA SANGH: $11k → 14%SAVC-SHRI RADHA RAMAN VEDIC TEMPLE: $13k → 10%VADA GEETA FOUNDATION: $3k → 11%GOPAL PRASAD RANDEL: $2k → 11%THE BAPS SHRI SWAMI NARAYAN MANDIR: $3k → 14%BRAHMAN SAMAJ OF NORTH AMERICA (BSNA): $3k → 14%VEDIC AMERICAN FOUNDATION INC: $500 → 13%ISKON- PHOENIX: $501 → 11%KRISHNA BHAKTI SEVA SANGH: $5k → 14%SAVC-RADHA RAMAN VEDIC TEMPLE: $12k → 10%42 KADVA PATIDAR GAM SAMAJ: $1k → 11%BRAHMAN SAMAJ OF NORTH AMERICA (BSNA): $504 → 14%ISKON- PHOENIX: $501 → 11%KRISHNA BHAKTI SEVA SANGH: $5k → 14%SAVC-SHRI RADHA RAMAN VEDIC TEMPLE: $3k → 10%SHREE UMIA MATAJI MANDIR: $1k → 11%SIDHARTH PATAK: $301 → 14%BHRAT: $5k → 11%KRISHNA BHAKTI SEVA SANGH: $3k → 14%SAVC-SHRI RADHA RAMAN VEDIC TEMPLE: $2k → 10%GIRIRAJ BHANDARI: $2k → 11%BRAHMAN SAMAJ OF NORTH AMERICA (BSNA): $500 → 14%VISHNAV SAMAJ OF ARIZONA (VSAZ)-SHREENATHJI TEMPLE-: $501 → 11%SAVC-SHRI RADHA RAMAN VEDIC TEMPLE: $2k → 10%HINDU SOCIETY OF INLAND EMPIRE INC: $26k → 11%SRI VENKATA KRISHNA KSHETRA TEMPLE: $6k → 11%HINDU SOCIETY OF INLAND EMPIRE INC: $22k → 11%VAISHNAV SAMAJ OF ARIZONA-SHREENATHJI TEMPLE: $251 → 11%HINDU SOCIETY OF INLAND EMPIRE INC: $19k → 11%SRI VENKATA KRISHNA KSHETRA TEMPLE: $501 → 11%HINDU SOCIETY OF INLAND EMPIRE INC: $14k → 11%HINDU SOCIETY OF INLAND EMPIRE INC: $14k → 11%HINDU SOCIETY OF INLAND EMPIRE INC: $7k → 11%HINDU SOCIETY OF INLAND EMPIRE INC: $4k → 11%GIRIRAJ BHANDARI: $3k → 11%GIRIRAJ BHANDARI: $760 → 11%VIPUL K P JANI: $101 → 11%AUM SPIRITUAL CENTER: $21k → 11%AUM SPIRITUAL CENTER INC: $13k → 11%AUM SPIRITUAL CENTER INC: $11k → 11%AUM SPIRITUAL CENTER INC: $1k → 11%AUM SPIRITUAL CENTER INC: $501 → 11%SESA SAMUDRALA: $2k → 11%SANSKRIT RELIGIONS INSTITUTE: $101 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Beyond the US: 24% of all-years giving ($80k)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
India$80k · 6 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$289k · 10 repeat orgs$36k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
13

Total granted

$289k
$32k

Still filing today

30%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HS
    HINDU SOCIETY OF INLAND EMPIRE INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $105k
  • SD
    SHRI DAKSHINA MURTI-SHRI VISHWANATH SANYAS ASHRAM
    5× · 2019–2024 · $77k
  • AS
    AUM SPIRITUAL CENTER INC
    5× · 2019–2024 · $47k · revenue -20%

Funded once

  • SR
    SAVC-RADHA RAMAN VEDIC TEMPLE
    one grant, 2019 · $12k
  • B
    BHRAT
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • 7B
    7TH BATCH SP MEDICAL COLLEGE
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

3 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 3 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
3/3
Grantees still filing
2/3
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HINDU SOCIETY OF INLAND EMPIRE INC: $105,495 · OtherHINDU SOCIETY OF INLAND EMPIRE INCSHRI DAKSHINA MURTI-SHRI VISHWANATH SANYAS ASHRAM: $76,803 · OtherSHRI DAKSHINA MURTI-SHRI VISHWANATH SANYAS ASHRAMSAVC-SHRI RADHA RAMAN VEDIC TEMPLE: $19,324 · OtherSAVC-SHRI RADHA RAMAN VEDIC TEMPLESAVC-RADHA RAMAN VEDIC TEMPLE: $11,501 · Other+18 more: $40,983 · Other+18 moreAUM SPIRITUAL CENTER INC: $46,617 · ReligionAUM SPIRITUAL CENTER INCKRISHNA BHAKTI SEVA SANGH: $23,498 · ReligionKRISHNA BHAKTI SEVA SANG…+1 more: $752 · Religion
Other$254,106Religion$70,867

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAUM SPIRITUAL CENTER INC: $46,617 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetKRISHNA BHAKTI SEVA SANGH: $23,498 over 4y, 5.5% of budgetVAISHANAV SAMAJ OF ARIZONA INC: $752 over 2y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AUM SPIRITUAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds KRISHNA BHAKTI SEVA SANGH ↗
  • Who funds VAISHANAV SAMAJ OF ARIZONA INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sunder Mohan Tulsi Charitable Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sunder Mohan Tulsi Charitable Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Sunder Mohan Tulsi Charitable Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Sunder Mohan Tulsi Charitable Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Sunder Mohan Tulsi’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home