Skip to content

· Private foundation

Sun Moon and Stars Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$183k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$158k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$973kHealth$432kHuman Services$26kEmployment$15kReligion$13kArts & Culture$5kScience & Tech$5k
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $5k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $158k
$2,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TRUSTEES OF TUFTS College$157,500
THE JONSSON CANCER CENTER FOUNDATION$20,000
Gida's Club of South Florida Inc$2,500
Memorial Hospital$1,500
Nantucket Shellfish Association$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–23, $26k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Jack and Jill Children Center: $10k → 13%Jack & Jill Children's Center: $10k → 13%Jack and Jill Children's Center: $5k → 13%Jack and Jill Children's Center: $1k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.5M · 12 repeat orgs$1k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +50% since the first grant, against +20% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
1

Total granted

$1.5M
$1k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+20%

Still filing today

67%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesHealthEducationScience & TechReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TJ
    THE JONSSON CANCER CENTER FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2025 · $310k · revenue +50%
  • Trustees of Tufts College
    2× · 2017–2025 · $248k · revenue +50%
  • MF
    MEMORIAL FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2017–2022 · $100k · revenue +22%

Funded once

  • TW
    THEATRE WORKSHOP OF NANTUCKET INC
    one grant, 2023 · $1k · revenue +20%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Nantucket Conservation Foundation Inc

The nantucket conservation foundation owns, protects, and stewards over 9,000 acres of land and coastal shoreline, conserves nantucket's rare and significant natural resources, and engages in impactful ecological research to inform…

Environment
2
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
3
North Shore Health System Medical Faculty Group Practice

North shore health system medical faculty group practice (the corporation) functions as an extension of the northwell health hospitals by bringing medical care to community settings, providing care to medicare, medicaid, and other…

Health
4
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
5
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
6
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
7
H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute Hospital Inc

The primary purpose of the h. lee moffitt cancer center and research institute hospital, inc. ("hospital") is to contribute to the prevention and cure of cancer.

Health
8
Massachusetts Medical Society

To advance medical knowledge, to develop and maintain the highest professional and ethical standards of medical practice and health care, and to promote medical institutions formed on liberal principles for the health, benefit, and welfare…

—
9
Norwalk Seaport Association Inc

The norwalk seaport association, inc. offers a cultural, environmental, and historical journey to the norwalk islands. the sheffield island lighthouse and the light keeper's cottage provide a unique historical and educational venue which…

Arts & Culture
10
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
11
Gloucester Marine Genomics Institute Incorporated

Gloucester marine genomics institute's mission is to address critical challenges in ocean health, human health, and the environment through innovative marine biotechnology research and transformative science education. by combining…

Science & Tech
12
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Nantucket Historical Association; the most unlike its peers is Jack and Jill Children's Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
9/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Trustees of Tufts University: $690,000 · OtherTrustees of Tufts UniversityTHE JONSSON CANCER CENTER FOUNDATION: $310,000 · OtherTHE JONSSON CANCER CENTER FOUNDATIONMEMORIAL FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 · OtherMEMORIAL FOUNDATION INCCollege of Charleston: $50,000 · Other+2 more: $15,000 · OtherTrustees of Tufts College: $247,500 · EducationTrustees of Tufts C…JACK AND JILL CHILDREN'S CENTER INC: $26,000 · Human ServicesGILDA'S CLUB OF SOUTH FLORIDA INC: $18,000 · HealthNANTUCKET SHELLFISH ASSOCIATION INC: $4,500 · Science & TechNANTUCKET HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION: $3,500 · Arts & CultureTHEATRE WORKSHOP OF NANTUCKET INC: $1,000 · Arts & CulturePOIEMA MOVEMENT INC: $1,750 · Religion
Other$1,165,000Education$247,500Human Services$26,000Health$18,000Science & Tech$4,500Arts & Culture$4,500Religion$1,750

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE JONSSON CANCER CENTER FOUNDATION: $310,000 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetTrustees of Tufts College: $247,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEMORIAL FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetJACK AND JILL CHILDREN'S CENTER INC: $26,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetGILDA'S CLUB OF SOUTH FLORIDA INC: $18,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetNANTUCKET SHELLFISH ASSOCIATION INC: $4,500 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetNANTUCKET HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION: $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPOIEMA MOVEMENT INC: $1,750 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHEATRE WORKSHOP OF NANTUCKET INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE JONSSON CANCER CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Trustees of Tufts College ↗
  • Who funds MEMORIAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds JACK AND JILL CHILDREN'S CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds GILDA'S CLUB OF SOUTH FLORIDA INC ↗
  • Who funds NANTUCKET SHELLFISH ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NANTUCKET HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds POIEMA MOVEMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds THEATRE WORKSHOP OF NANTUCKET INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA5.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sun Moon and Stars Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sun Moon and Stars Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Trustees of Tufts College: 13% of income from government
  • Jack and Jill Children's Center Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Nantucket Historical Association: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Sun Moon and Stars Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Sun Moon and Stars Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Sun Moon and Stars’ filings →

More from the funding graph