· Public charity
Sun Belt Conference
The purpose of the SUN BELT CONFERENCE shall be to assist its member institutions in the maintenance of programs of intercollegiate athletics.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 14 grants below total $24,307,113 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $41,401,730 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $17,094,617 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| JAMES MADISON UNIVERSITY | $1,977,767 |
| MARSHALL UNIVERSITY | $1,717,642 |
| UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA MONROE | $1,717,642 |
| OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY | $1,717,642 |
| COASTAL CAROLINA UNIVERSITY | $1,717,642 |
| TROY UNIVERSITY | $1,717,642 |
| ARKANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY | $1,717,642 |
| UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH ALABAMA | $1,717,642 |
| GEORGIA SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY | $1,717,642 |
| UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA LAFAYETTE | $1,717,642 |
| GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY | $1,717,642 |
| TEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY | $1,717,642 |
| UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MISSISSIPPI | $1,717,642 |
| APPALACHIAN STATE UNIVERSITY | $1,717,642 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
16 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ASAPPALACHIAN STATE UNIVERSITY9× · 2017–2025 · $13M
- GSGEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY9× · 2017–2025 · $13M
- IGIndividual grant recipient9× · 2017–2025 · $13M
Funded once
- TSTROY STATE UNIVERSITY2× · 2017–2018 · $1.5M
- ULUNIVERSITY LOUSISANA - MONROE2× · 2017–2018 · $1.4M
- UOUNIVERSITY OF IDAHO2× · 2017–2018 · $892k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
0 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 0 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.