Skip to content

· Private foundation

Sulsberger Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$316k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$47k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$710kArts & Culture$656kEducation$449kHuman Services$449kPhilanthropy$303kYouth Development$210kCommunity Improvement$150kReligion$60kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $47k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $269k
$15,807
Median grant
5
States reached
$6.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ZANESVILLE BD OF EDUCATION$47,421
YMCA$47,421
UNITED WAY WORLDWIDE$31,614
ZANESVILLE CONCERT ASSN$31,614
ZANESVILLE MUSEUM OF ART$31,614
GSMC FOUNDATION$31,614
BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA$15,807
ZANESVILLE CIVIC LEAGUE INC$15,807
ALLWELL BEHAVORIAL HEALTH$15,807
MUSKINGUM COUNTY BOARD OF$9,484
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS INC$6,323
PIONEER & HISTORICAL SOCIETY$6,323
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$6,323
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC$6,323
ST JAMES EPISCOPAL CHURCH$6,323
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $264k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BUCKEYE VALLEY FAMILY YMCA: $61k → 10%BUCKEYE VALLEY FAMILY YMCA: $55k → 10%BUCKEYE VALLEY FAMILY YMCA: $53k → 10%BUCKEYE VALLEY FAMILY YMCA: $47k → 10%BUCKEYE VALLEY FAMILY YMCA: $47k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.9M · 18 repeat orgs$86k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
1

Total granted

$2.9M
$7k

Still filing today

33%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $79k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHealthCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ZC
    ZANESVILLE CONCERT ASSOCIATION % RICK AICHELE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $300k · revenue +40% · 71% of their budget
  • LC
    Licking County Family YMCA
    5× · 2020–2024 · $264k · revenue +34%
  • AB
    ALLWELL BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SERVICES
    9× · 2017–2025 · $150k · revenue +20%

Funded once

  • PH
    PIONEER HISTORICAL SOCIETY
    one grant, 2020 · $7k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Valdosta-Lowndes County Family Ymca (1456)

To put christian principles into practice through programs that build healthy spirit, mind and body for all

Human Services
2
Community Ymca of Alamance County

We are an association of all ages, abilities, incomes, races and religions. we are committed to providing quality programs focused on youth development, healthy living and social responsibility. in youth development, we provide enriching…

Human Services
3
Ymca of Northern Rock County Inc

To put christian principles into practice through programs that build healthy spirit, mind and body for all.

—
4
Winona Family Ymca Inc

The winona family ymca is a charitable, community service organization that includes men, women and children of all ages, abilities, incomes, races and religions. we are dedicated to building strong kids, strong families and strong…

—
5
The Young Men's Christian Association of Hastings Nebraska

The hastings family ymca puts christian principles into practice through programs that build healthy spirits, minds, and bodies for all.

Human Services
6
Young Men's Christian Association of the Virginia Peninsulas

Our mission is to put christian principles into practice through programs that build healthy spirit, mind and body for all. our focus is on youth development, healthy living and social responsibility. we help kids succeed, prepare teens…

Human Services
7
Cleveland County Family Young Men's Christian Association Inc

The mission of the ymca is to put christian principles into practice through programs that build healthy spirit, mind and body for all. the y mission is also to advance our cause of strengthening community through youth development,…

—
8
Young Women's Christian Association of Gettysburg and Adams County

The ywca of gettysburg & adams county is dedicated to eliminating racism, empowering women and promoting peace, justice, freedom, and dignity for all. the ywca is adams county's center for personal and community growth - a place to learn,…

—
9
Ymca of San Diego County

The ymca of san diego county is a nonprofit with a mission to nurture a healthy spirit, mind, and body so all can thrive while honoring our faith-based heritage.

Human Services
10
Iowa Credit Union League

The iowa credit union league (icul) is the non-profit trade association that represents the interests of iowa's credit unions. icul was established in 1933 and continues to focus on our mission "to strengthen the credit union movement by…

—
11
Young Men's Christian Association of Central New Mexico

The mission of the ymca of central new mexico is to put christian principles into practice through programs that build a healthy spirit, mind and body for all. for over 100 years, the ymca of central new mexico has served our community…

—
12
United States Telecom Association

See schedule oustelecom exists to ensure members can compete, grow and thrive to build a world where families, enterprises and communities are connected through the power of broadband.our member companies have committed a considerable…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Muskingum Family Y; the most unlike its peers is Zanesville Concert Association % Rick Aichele. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
3/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ZANESVILLE BD OF EDUCATION: $449,473 · OtherZANESVILLE BD OF EDUCATIONGSMC FOUNDATION: $299,651 · OtherGSMC FOUNDATIONUNITED WAY OF MUSKINGUM PERRY: $271,754 · OtherUNITED WAY OF MUSKINGUM PERRYALLWELL BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SERVICES: $149,826 · OtherALLWELL BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SERVICESMUSKINGUM FAMILY Y: $138,084 · OtherMUSKINGUM FAMILY YMUSKINGUM VALLEY COUNCIL BOY: $134,019 · OtherMUSKINGUM VALLEY COUNCIL BOYMUSKINGUM CO BOARD OF MRDD: $80,412 · Other+10 more: $413,323 · Other+10 moreZANESVILLE CONCERT ASSOCIATION % RICK AICHELE: $299,651 · Arts & CultureZANESVILLE CONCERT ASS…ZANESVILLE MUSEUM OF ART: $295,934 · Arts & CultureZANESVILLE MUSEUM OF A…Licking County Family YMCA: $263,968 · Human ServicesLicking C…ZANESVILLE CIVIC LEAGUE INC: $149,826 · Community ImprovementUNITED WAY WORLDWIDE: $31,614 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $12,646 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc: $6,323 · Health
Other$1,936,542Arts & Culture$595,585Human Services$263,968Community Improvement$149,826Philanthropy$31,614Health$18,969

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetZANESVILLE CONCERT ASSOCIATION % RICK AICHELE: $299,651 over 9y, 71% of budgetZANESVILLE MUSEUM OF ART: $295,934 over 9y, 6.8% of budgetLicking County Family YMCA: $263,968 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetZANESVILLE CIVIC LEAGUE INC: $149,826 over 9y, 11% of budgetALLWELL BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SERVICES: $149,826 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetMUSKINGUM FAMILY Y: $138,084 over 3y, 24% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $12,646 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $6,323 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ZANESVILLE CONCERT ASSOCIATION % RICK AICHELE ↗
  • Who funds ZANESVILLE MUSEUM OF ART ↗
  • Who funds Licking County Family YMCA ↗
  • Who funds ZANESVILLE CIVIC LEAGUE INC ↗
  • Who funds ALLWELL BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds MUSKINGUM FAMILY Y ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY WORLDWIDE ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

J William & Mary Straker Charitable FdnOH15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: J William & Mary Straker Charitable Fdn

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sulsberger Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sulsberger Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Sulsberger’s filings →

    More from the funding graph