Skip to content

· Private foundation

Sudha and Rajesh Patel Foundation

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$5k
Granted FY2023
30
Grants FY2023
12
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2023.

Health$9kReligion$5kHuman Services$2kInternational$700Housing & Shelter$600Public Safety & Disaster$400Science & Tech$375Environment$100Other$0
02FY2023 · 30 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$200
Median grant
12
States reached
$135k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HINDU TEMPLE$1,111
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$200
PROSTATE CARE FOUNDATION$200
AMERICAN RED CROSS$200
UNICEF USA$200
ST JUDES CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSPITA$200
MARCH OF DIMES$200
ALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION$200
SUSAN LOMEN CANCER CENTER$200
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$200
THE SALVATION ARMY$200
THE CARTER CENTER$200
SHRINERS HOSPITAL FOR CHILDRENS$200
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$200
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $75) land where the poverty rate runs at 21%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%WESTLAND GOODFELLOWS: $75 → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
MN
MI
IA
PA
VA
MD
AZ
KS
TN
DC
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$15k · 17 repeat orgs$4k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2023, 5 since wound down; 18 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
1

Total granted

$15k
$2k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+39%

Still filing today

29%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 59% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23
HealthHuman ServicesEducationInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $750 · revenue +78%
  • AH
    American Heart Association Inc
    4× · 2020–2023 · $700 · revenue +53%
  • WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $600 · revenue +27%

Funded once

  • HF
    HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEMgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $2k · revenue +39%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
2
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
3
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
4
Researchamerica

2025 was a turbulent year for the medical and health research community, but our commitment to advocating for science never wavered. from pushing back against funding threats to elevating researchers' voices and equipping advocates, we…

—
5
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
6
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
7
United States Pharmacopeial Convention

Usp's mission is to improve global health through public standards and related programs that help ensure the quality, safety, and benefit of medicines and foods.

Health
8
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
9
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

As a leading academic healthcare organization, our mission is to elevate the health status of the communities we serve.(see schedule o for continuation)(continued)-we deliver exceptional healthcare enhanced by research and education-we…

Health
10
Targeting Resistance in Cancer Cooperative
Health
11
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
12
Medtech Innovator

Medtech innovator organizes and runs a global competition and virtual accelerator for medical device, digital health, and diagnostic startup companies.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of America; the most unlike its peers is Westland Goodfellows Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
10/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HINDU TEMPLE: $5,111 · OtherHINDU TEMPLESALVATION ARMY: $900 · OtherSALVATION ARMYAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY: $900 · OtherAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETYMEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER: $900 · OtherMEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCERALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION: $750 · OtherALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATIONHABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $600 · OtherUNICEF USA: $500 · Other+19 more: $3,625 · Other+19 moreHENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM: $2,000 · HealthHENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEMST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $750 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARC…MARCH OF DIMES INC: $750 · HealthMARCH OF DIMES INCAmerican Heart Association Inc: $700 · HealthAmerican Heart Association…+2 more: $200 · HealthWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $600 · Human ServicesWESTLAND GOODFELLOWS INC: $75 · Human ServicesNATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC SOCIETY: $300 · EducationMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $200 · International
Other$13,286Health$4,400Human Services$675Education$300International$200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $750 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $750 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $700 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC SOCIETY: $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Diabetes Association: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWESTLAND GOODFELLOWS INC: $75 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds MARCH OF DIMES INC ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds American Diabetes Association ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WESTLAND GOODFELLOWS INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sudha and Rajesh Patel Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sudha and Rajesh Patel Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Sudha and Rajesh Patel’s filings →

More from the funding graph