Skip to content
Stxbp1 Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Stxbp1 Foundation

To create awareness in the disorders associated with stxbp1 mutations.

$829k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$344k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Health$1.2MScience & Tech$272kEducation$245k
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $65k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $420k
  • $250k+1 grant · $344k
$60,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL COLORADO$343,881
WEILL CORNELL MEDICINE$123,751
BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE$100,000
STANFORD UNIVERSITY$78,590
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PENNSYLVANIA$60,000
UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA$57,446
NYU$30,324
UNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND$25,000
UPLIFTING ATHLETES$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 61% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%UPLIIFTING ATHLETES: $10k → 6%UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA - HELLER LAB: $155k → 22%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $79k → 8%COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY: $89k → 17%BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE: $100k → 16%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL COLORADO: $344k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND: $25k → 22%UPLIIFTING ATHLETES: $10k → 6%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PENNSYLVANIA: $60k → 22%NYU: $30k → 17%BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE: $100k → 16%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL COLORADO: $104k → 10%UPLIFTING ATHLETES: $10k → 6%UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $57k → 22%WEILL CORNELL MEDICINE: $124k → 17%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL COLORADO: $73k → 10%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA: $50k → 22%WEILL CORNELL MEDICINE: $83k → 17%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL COLORADO: $23k → 10%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA: $50k → 22%WEILL CORNELL MEDICINE: $45k → 17%UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA - HELLER LAB: $39k → 22%WEILL CORNELL MEDICINE: $15k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 5 repeat orgs$55k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +45% since the first grant, against +7% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
2

Total granted

$1.2M
$55k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
+7%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $55k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    Children's Hospital Colorado Health System
    4× · 2021–2024 · $544k · revenue +89%
  • NY
    NEW YORK WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL CENTER FUND INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $266k · revenue +8%
  • BC
    Baylor College of Medicine
    2× · 2023–2024 · $200k · revenue +17%

Funded once

  • NY
    New York University
    one grant, 2024 · $30k · revenue 0%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND
    one grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue +7%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Cornell University

Education, research, medical services and other public services.

Education
2
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
3
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
4
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences

We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.

Education
5
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
6
Washington University

The washington university is a co-educational, nondenominational university with a long and distinguished history of teaching, research and (cont'd on schedule o)

Education
7
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
8
Southern California University of Health Sciences

The mission of southern california university of health sciences (scu) is to educate students as competent, caring and successful practitioners of integrative healthcare. the university is committed to providing excellence in academics,…

Education
9
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
10
Rhode Island Hospital

As a founding hospital in the brown university health system, rih is committed to its mission: delivering health with care.

Health
11
William Marsh Rice University

As a leading research university with a distinctive commitment to undergraduate education, Rice University aspires to path breaking research, unsurpassed teaching, and contributions to the betterment of our world. It seeks to fulfill this…

Education
12
Case Western Reserve University

Case Western Reserve University is an independent, research-oriented university with broadly based strengths in health, including medicine, nursing and dentistry; in engineering; in the arts and sciences; and in law, management and social…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York; the most unlike its peers is Uplifting Athletes Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Children's Hospital Colorado Health System: $544,310 · HealthChildren's Hospital Colorado Health SystemNEW YORK WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL CENTER FUND INC: $266,251 · HealthNEW YORK WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL CENTER FUND INCTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA: $160,000 · HealthTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA+1 more: $30,000 · HealthTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $250,887 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIABaylor College of Medicine: $200,000 · EducationBaylor College of MedicineTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $89,442 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CI…THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $78,590 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD …New York University: $30,324 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND: $25,000 · Education
Health$1,000,561Education$674,243

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetChildren's Hospital Colorado Health System: $544,310 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetNEW YORK WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL CENTER FUND INC: $266,251 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $250,887 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBaylor College of Medicine: $200,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA: $160,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $89,442 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $78,590 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNew York University: $30,324 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUPLIFTING ATHLETES INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Stxbp1 Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Stxbp1 Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Stxbp1 Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Stxbp1 Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Stxbp1’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home