· Public charity
Student Organizing Inc
To promote the civic engagement of college and university students around environmental issues, consumer protection, college affordability, student debt, cost of textbooks, and hunger and homelessness.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 5 grants below total $155,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $165,000 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $10,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k4 grants · $91k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $64k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CALIFORNIA STUDENT PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH GROUP | $64,000 |
| NEW JERSEY PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH GROUP | $26,000 |
| WASHINGTON STATE PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH GROUP | $25,000 |
| OREGON STUDENT PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH GROUP | $25,000 |
| MASSACHUSETTS STUDENT PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH GROUP | $15,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 80% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +12% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
11 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PNPIRG NEW VOTERS PROJECT INC2× · 2020–2021 · $740k · revenue +82% · 85% of their budget
- USUNITED STATES PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH GROUP EDUCATION FUND INC3× · 2020–2022 · $218k · revenue +26%
- MSMASSACHUSETTS STUDENT PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH GROUP INC4× · 2021–2025 · $72k · revenue +12%
Funded once
- TPTEXAS PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH GROUP EDUCATION FUND INCone grant, 2023 · $40k · revenue -40% · 80% of their budget
- OSOREGON STATE PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH GROUP INCone grant, 2023 · $26k · revenue +16%
- MPMASSACHUSETTS PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH GROUP INCone grant, 2023 · $17k · revenue -2%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
When consumers are cheated or the voices of ordinary citizens are drowned out by special interest lobbyists, illinoispirg speaks up and takes action. we uncover threats to public health and wellbeing and fight to end them, using the…
Operate exclusively for the promotion of social welfare by undertaking the following activities: (a) to identify problems and advocate solutions in the areas of: (1) consumer protection; (2) environmental preservation; (3) protection…
The new york public interest research group nypirg, new york state's largest studentdirected research and civic engagement organization, is uniquely designed to provideexperiential learning and civic engagement opportunities for college…
With public debate around important issues often dominated by special interests pursuing their own narrow agenda, Maryland PIRG Foundation offers an independent voice that works on behalf of the public interest. Maryland PIRG Foundation…
Protect consumers and promote good government. we investigate problems, craft solutions, educate the public, and offer bay staters meaningful opportunities for civic participation.
The purpose of the corporation is to promote social welfare within the meaning of Section 501(c)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code. The corporation's activities may include public education, research, litigation, and advocacy on issues…
The Corporation is organized for the purposes of enhancing the social welfare of all New Mexicans through advocacy on issues of environmental and public concern. This objective shalll be achieved by the following means: (A) The corporation…
The montana public interest research group (montpirg) is a student directed non-partisan organization dedicated to creating positive change by educating, organizing, mobilizing, and empowering the next generation of civic leaders.
The purpose of the corporation is to engage in public education within the meaning of section 501c3 of the internal revenue code. the corporations activities may include public education, research, and litigation on issues affecting the…
Pennsylvania public interest group delivers persistent, result oriented public interest activism that protects consumers, encourages a fair and sustainable economy, and fosters a democratic government.
The purpose of the corporation is to identify, research and analyze problems affecting the public interest and social welfare, and to engage in advocacy, education and litigation in furtherance of the public interest.
To conduct research, policy analysis, and public education to advance solutions to problems that affect consumers' healthy, safety, and well-being. the organization's mission is to spotlight the problems that threaten the future and offer…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Oregon Student Public Interest Research Group Education Fund Inc and the most unlike its peers is Aguila Youth Leadership Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PIRG NEW VOTERS PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA STUDENT PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH GROUP ↗
- Who funds UNITED STATES PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH GROUP EDUCATION FUND INC ↗
- Who funds NORTH CAROLINA PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH GROUP EDUC FUND INC ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON STATE PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH GROUP ↗
- Who funds OREGON STUDENT PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH GROUP EDUCATION FUND INC ↗
- Who funds MASSACHUSETTS STUDENT PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH GROUP INC ↗
- Who funds MARYLAND PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH GROUP INC ↗
- Who funds CAMPUS ORGANIZING SUPPORT SERVICES ↗
- Who funds NEW JERSEY STUDENT PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH GROUP INC ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH GROUP ↗
- Who funds TEXAS PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH GROUP EDUCATION FUND INC ↗
- Who funds OREGON STATE PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH GROUP INC ↗
- Who funds MASSACHUSETTS PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH GROUP INC ↗
- Who funds AGUILA YOUTH LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Pirg New Voters Project Inc · Environment America Research and Policy Center Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Student Organizing Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Student Organizing Inc?
Find your warmest path to Student Organizing Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.