Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Stuart and Eileen Kaufman Foundation In

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$50k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Health$317kRecreation & Sports$14kHuman Services$10kReligion$9k
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $35k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC$15,000
EPILEPSY FOUNDATION OF AMERICA$10,000
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$10,000
THE JOHNS HOPKINS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$5,000
HEBREW HOME OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC$5,000
JUVENILE DIABETES RESEARCH FOUNDATION INTERNATIONAL$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–22, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%PROGRESS CLUB FOUNDATION INC: $3k → 8%PROGRESS CLUB FOUNDATION INC: $3k → 8%PROGRESS CLUB FOUNDATION INC: $3k → 8%PROGRESS CLUB FOUNDATION INC: $3k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$339k · 10 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
2

Total granted

$339k
$10k

Still filing today

80%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $75k · revenue +145%
  • EF
    EPILEPSY FOUNDATION OF AMERICA
    7× · 2017–2024 · $69k · revenue +1%
  • HH
    HEBREW HOME OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $50k · revenue +6%

Funded once

  • JD
    JUVENILE DIABETES RESEARCH FOUNDATION INTERNATIONAL
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
  • TJ
    THE JOHNS HOPKINS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hugo W Moser Research Institute At Kennedy Krieger Inc

The hugo w. moser research institute at kennedy krieger, inc. (the "research institute") is an internationally recognized research facility finding answers to problems and injuries that affect a child's developing brain. researchers have…

Science & Tech
2
Lucy Webb Hayes National Training School for Deaconesses & Missionaries

Sibley memorial hospital in washington, d.c., a member of johns hopkins medicine, has a distinguished history of serving the community since its founding in 1890. as a not-for-profit, full-service community hospital, sibley offers…

Health
3
Children's Hospital & Research Center At Oakland

The mission of children's hospital & research center at oakland is to protect and advance the health and well-being of children through clinical care, teaching and research.

Health
4
Johns Hopkins Health System Corporation

Johns hopkins health system corporation provides centralized management of a multi-hospital healthcare system. it is a key component of johns hopkins medicine, a collaboration with the johns hopkins university school of medicine.

Health
5
Children's Research Institute

Children's research institute dba children's national research institute conducts and promotes translational and clinical medical research and education programs that lead to improved understanding, prevention, treatment, and care of…

Health
6
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
7
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
8
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
9
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
10
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
11
Children's National

Children's national coordinates the overall policy and activities of the affiliated organizations. see schedule o.

Health
12
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Hospital Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Maccabi Usa Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $74,800 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INCEPILEPSY FOUNDATION OF AMERICA — $69,000 · HealthEPILEPSY FOUNDATION OF AMERICAHEBREW HOME OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC — $50,000 · HealthHEBREW HOME OF GREATER WASHINGTON INCCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $50,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONTHE JOHNS HOPKINS HOSPITAL — $25,000 · HealthTHE JOHNS HOPKINS HOSPITALMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC — $15,000 · HealthJUVENILE DIABETES RESEARCH FOUNDATION INTERNATIONA — $23,000 · OtherJUVENILE DIAB…CONGREGSTION HAR TZEON AGADITH ACHIM — $9,000 · OtherCONGREGSTION …JUVENILE DIABETES RESEARCH FOUNDATION INTERNATIONAL — $5,000 · OtherJUVENILE DIAB…THE JOHNS HOPKINS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $5,000 · OtherTHE JOHNS HOP…MACCABI USA INC — $13,500 · Recreation & SportsTHE PROGRESS CLUB FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 · Human Services
Health$283,800Other$42,000Recreation & Sports$13,500Human Services$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $74,800 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetEPILEPSY FOUNDATION OF AMERICA — $69,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetHEBREW HOME OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC — $50,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JOHNS HOPKINS HOSPITAL — $25,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC — $15,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMACCABI USA INC — $13,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE PROGRESS CLUB FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 4y, 9.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
  • Who funds EPILEPSY FOUNDATION OF AMERICA
  • Who funds HEBREW HOME OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE JOHNS HOPKINS HOSPITAL
  • Who funds MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds MACCABI USA INC
  • Who funds THE PROGRESS CLUB FOUNDATION INC

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Stuart and Eileen Kaufman Foundation In funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Epilepsy Foundation of America22% of income from government
  • Hebrew Home of Greater Washington Inc0% of income from government
  • The Johns Hopkins Hospital0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Stuart and Eileen Kaufman Foundation In?

Find your warmest path to Stuart and Eileen Kaufman Foundation In through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph