Skip to content

· Private foundation

Strulovich Family Foundation Trust

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$4k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Religion$3.2MPhilanthropy$520kArts & Culture$270kHuman Services$97kInternational$30kHealth$18kEducation$6kFood & Nutrition$3kOther$0
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$95
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KEREN TORAH VECHESED INC$3,000
T T LIZENSK$1,229
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–22, $28k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%CHASDEI AVROHOM ELIEZER INC: $2k → 20%DAAT TORAH: $5k → 20%AHAVAT YISROEL HUMANITY INC: $6k → 20%AHAVAS YISRUEL HUMANITY INC: $6k → 20%AHAVAS YISRUEL HUMANITY INC: $6k → 20%AVIHEM INC: $3k → 20%AVIHEM INC: $2k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.5M · 95 repeat orgs$791k to everyone else

95 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 93 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

95
77

Total granted

$3.5M
$791k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+72%

Still filing today

15%
9%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionPhilanthropyHuman ServicesEducationInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CV
    CHAYIM V CHESED
    4× · 2019–2022 · $70k · revenue +107%
  • TT
    TALMUD TORAH BRESLOV INC
    3× · 2020–2022 · $58k · revenue +156%
  • AL
    AYZER LALIYA INC
    3× · 2020–2022 · $51k · revenue +90%

Funded once

  • CS
    CONGREGATION SHERI TORAH OF KHAL
    one grant, 2019 · $96k
  • BM
    BEER MIRIAM INC
    one grant, 2019 · $68k
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVAT
    one grant, 2019 · $55k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
2
Tomchei Torah Inc

Religious Teaching

—
3
Or Yechiel

Award grants to promote torah study

Religion
4
Ohr Yisrael Yeshiva Inc

Ohr Yisrael is a religious institution that provides religious services and instruction to Rabbis and community members.

Religion
5
Talmud Torah Tzfat Inc

We make grants to support orthodox jewish education.

Religion
6
Chasdei Dovid Elimelech Inc
Philanthropy
7
Kollel Nefesh Hachaim Inc
Education
8
Keren Yaakov Ben Menachen Tzvi Foundation
Philanthropy
9
Yeshivas D'var Torah Inc

Organization raises funds which are disbursed to religious schools of higher education and talmudic research

Philanthropy
10
Ziv Israel Association
—
11
Emet Veshalom Inc

To support organizations in israel that promote and encourage the study of jewish literary works including the study of the torah, mishna and talmud.

Religion
12
Bais Yehuda Perach Rochel Foundation
Public Benefit
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ahavat Yisroel Humanity Inc; the most unlike its peers is Vaad Ha'artzy Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 172 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/27
Grantees still filing
19/27
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MISCELLANEOUS CHARITABLE ORG: $485,898 · OtherMISCELLANEOUS CHARITABLE ORGNECHOMAS YISROEL: $336,800 · OtherNECHOMAS YISROELCONGREGATION AVNEI ZEDEK: $255,000 · OtherCONGREGATION AVNEI ZEDEKAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MOSDOT BEER: $202,417 · OtherCONGREGATION SHIMIE DVAR HASHEM: $135,794 · Other+144 more: $2,474,174 · Other+144 moreCHAYIM V CHESED: $70,388 · ReligionTALMUD TORAH BRESLOV INC: $58,326 · ReligionAYZER LALIYA INC: $51,250 · ReligionDARKEI SHMUEL INC: $24,300 · ReligionMOSDOS BETH YOSEF ZVI: $24,000 · ReligionKOLLEL DIVREI YOEL D'SATMAR BP: $20,000 · ReligionORAH VSIMCHA INC: $11,500 · Religion+4 more: $10,800 · ReligionPINSK KARLIN INC: $34,500 · PhilanthropyMESIVTA NEZER HATALMUD INC: $19,200 · PhilanthropyTHE YAD LELEV FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · PhilanthropyFRIENDS OF ZICHRON MEIR INC FRIENDS OF ZICHRON MEIR: $5,000 · PhilanthropyBNOS YERUSHLAYIM: $33,250 · InternationalKEREN TORAH VCHESED: $5,750 · InternationalOHR HAMAIER INC: $30,188 · EducationBAIS SHAINDEL: $5,500 · EducationAHAVAT YISROEL HUMANITY INC: $17,000 · Human ServicesDAAT TORAH: $5,008 · Human ServicesAVIHEM INC: $4,300 · Human ServicesCHASDEI AVROHOM ELIEZER INC: $1,800 · Human Services
Other$3,890,083Religion$270,564Philanthropy$63,700International$39,000Education$35,688Human Services$28,108

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHAYIM V CHESED: $70,388 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetTALMUD TORAH BRESLOV INC: $58,326 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetAYZER LALIYA INC: $51,250 over 3y, 6.6% of budgetPINSK KARLIN INC: $34,500 over 4y, 5.5% of budgetMENUCHA U'KEDUSHA INC: $33,500 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetBNOS YERUSHLAYIM: $33,250 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetOHR HAMAIER INC: $30,188 over 4y, 3.4% of budgetDARKEI SHMUEL INC: $24,300 over 2y, 15% of budgetMOSDOS BETH YOSEF ZVI: $24,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetKOLLEL DIVREI YOEL D'SATMAR BP: $20,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetMESIVTA NEZER HATALMUD INC: $19,200 over 3y, 4.3% of budgetAHAVAT YISROEL HUMANITY INC: $17,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetORAH VSIMCHA INC: $11,500 over 3y, 5.6% of budgetZERA KOIDESH INC: $8,800 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetKEREN TORAH VCHESED: $5,750 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetDAAT TORAH: $5,008 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTHE YAD LELEV FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetFRIENDS OF ZICHRON MEIR INC FRIENDS OF ZICHRON MEIR: $5,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetCHINUCH HATUHOIR INC: $5,000 over 1y, 7.9% of budgetAVIHEM INC: $4,300 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCHASDEI AVROHOM ELIEZER INC: $1,800 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetTRUE TORAH JEWS INC: $1,800 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetVAAD HA'ARTZY INC: $1,800 over 1y, 7.1% of budgetYAAZORU INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHAYIM V CHESED ↗
  • Who funds TALMUD TORAH BRESLOV INC ↗
  • Who funds AYZER LALIYA INC ↗
  • Who funds PINSK KARLIN INC ↗
  • Who funds MENUCHA U'KEDUSHA INC ↗
  • Who funds BNOS YERUSHLAYIM ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundNY105.4× affinity125 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · American Friends of Bnai Levy Foundation · Zelig and Rifky Weiss Family Foundation Inc · The Lexicon Foundation Inc · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Chayim V Chesed · Hf Foundation · The Schwartz Charitable Foundation Inc · Bochner Foundation · I&S Foundation · S&E Foundation · Asm Family Charitable Foundation Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Strulovich Family Foundation Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Strulovich Family Foundation Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 172 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Strulovich Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph