· Private foundation
Stevens Margaret L Fdn-Ima
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k30 grants · $84k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS USA | $10,000 |
| INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE | $10,000 |
| NO KID HUNGRY | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL | $5,000 |
| CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE | $5,000 |
| PROJECT HOPE | $5,000 |
| HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH | $5,000 |
| CRISTO REY CHARLESTON HIGH SCHOOL | $5,000 |
| MAGEE-WOMENS RESEARCH INSTITUTE AND FDN | $4,000 |
| TAFT SCHOOL | $4,000 |
| LOW COUNTRY FOOD BANK | $3,000 |
| BURLINGTON CITY ARTS | $2,500 |
| FEEDING AMERICA | $2,000 |
| TOUCHSTONE FARM | $2,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $92k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 52% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
39 repeat relationships — 29 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC5× · 2020–2025 · $46k · revenue +39%- IRInternational Rescue Committee INC5× · 2020–2025 · $46k · revenue +63%
- CCCANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC6× · 2020–2025 · $34k · revenue +70%
Funded once
- DWDOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS USAone grant, 2024 · $11k
- IRINTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEEone grant, 2024 · $11k
- HRHUMAN RIGHTS WATCHone grant, 2024 · $6k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Education and Research
The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…
Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…
For over 60 years, counterpart international has partnered with communities worldwide to turn local ideas into lasting solutions, connecting local vision with global opportunity. (continued on schedule o)we believe people closest to the…
Improve the food value chain in developing countries by mobilizing corporate volunteers to share knowledge and expertise with small and growing food processors.
We save children's lives by transforming pediatric heart care in underserved parts of the world.
Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…
Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…
Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…
Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…
Commonwealth care alliance, inc.'s mission is to improve the health and well-being of people with significant needs by innovating, coordinating and providing the highest quality, individualized care.
Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc and the most unlike its peers is Project Ho-Pe Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
39 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 39 of the 54 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
- Who funds CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC ↗
- Who funds SHARE OUR STRENGTH ↗
- Who funds HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC ↗
- Who funds AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC ↗
- Who funds PROJECT HO-PE INC ↗
- Who funds CR JRS CHIP ↗
- Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF CHITTENDEN COUNTY ↗
- Who funds Vermont Childrens Trust Foundation ↗
- Who funds VERMONT FAMILY NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds LOWCOUNTRY FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds Common Roots Inc ↗
- Who funds KING STREET CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds MAGEE-WOMENS RESEARCH INSTITUTE AND FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FLYNN CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS LTD ↗
- Who funds NEXT GENERATION CHOICES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds TOUCHSTONE FARM INC ↗
- Who funds K9S FOR WARRIORS INC ↗
- Who funds YOUTH CATALYTICS INC ↗
- Who funds THE TAFT SCHOOL CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds THE NIGHTINGALE-BAMFORD SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds PROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE KISKI SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds CRISTO REY CHARLESTON HIGH SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds KIAWAH WOMENS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH ↗
- Who funds SOUTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL LAW PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds FIRST TEE GREATER CHARLESTON ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: National Life Group Charitable Foundation Inc · The Vermont Community Foundation · Turrell Fund · Antonio B and Rita M Pomerleau Foundation Inc · The Waterwheel Foundation · Ben & Jerry's Foundation Inc · Amy E Tarrant Foundation Inc · The Harvey & Ruth Gelfenbein Charitable Foundation Inc · The Onda Foundation Inc · The Lionheart Charitable Trust · The Morris & Bessie Altman Foundation · Vermont Childrens Trust Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Stevens Margaret L Fdn-Ima funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Vermont Family Network Inc — 81% of income from government
- Steps to End Domestic Violence Inc — 71% of income from government
- World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals — 67% of income from government
- Committee On Temporary Shelter Inc — 52% of income from government
- King Street Center Inc — 43% of income from government
- Vermont Childrens Trust Foundation — 8% of income from government
- Burlington City Arts Foundation Inc — 6% of income from government
- Flynn Center for the Performing Arts Ltd — 0% of income from government
- Common Roots Inc — 0% of income from government
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
- K9S for Warriors Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.