Skip to content

· Private foundation

Stern Family Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$415k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Human Services$1.2MFood & Nutrition$465kInternational$205kPublic Benefit$180kHousing & Shelter$105kCommunity Improvement$70kReligion$25kArts & Culture$25kOther$0
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k6 grants · $215k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $200k
$45,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SANCTUARY FOR FAMILIES$50,000
NEW ALTERNATIVES FOR CHILDREN INC$50,000
POWER OF TWO$50,000
ASSOCIATION TO BENEFIT CHILDREN$50,000
ROOM TO GROW$45,000
REACHING OUT COMMUNITY SERVICES INC$40,000
NEIGHBORS TOGETHER CORP$40,000
THE CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY$40,000
THE ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY$35,000
JEREMIAH PROGRAM$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $720k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%ASSOCIATION TO BENEFIT CHILDREN: $50k → 17%ROOM TO GROW: $45k → 17%ASSOCIATION TO BENEFIT CHILDREN: $50k → 17%ROOM TO GROW: $45k → 17%ASSOCIATION TO BENEFIT CHILDREN: $50k → 17%ROOM TO GROW: $40k → 17%ASSOCIATION TO BENEFIT CHILDREN: $50k → 17%ROOM TO GROW: $40k → 17%ASSOCIATION TO BENEFIT CHILDREN: $50k → 17%ROOM TO GROW: $35k → 17%ASSOCIATION TO BENEFIT CHILDREN: $25k → 17%ROOM TO GROW: $25k → 17%ASSOCIATION TO BENEFIT CHILDREN: $10k → 17%THE CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY: $40k → 17%THE CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY: $40k → 17%THE CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY: $35k → 17%THE CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY: $30k → 17%THE CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY: $25k → 17%THE CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY: $25k → 17%THE CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY: $10k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.2M · 12 repeat orgs$130k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
4

Total granted

$2.2M
$80k

Still filing today

75%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesFood & NutritionPhilanthropyHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NEW ALTERNATIVES FOR CHILDREN INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $285k · revenue +52%
  • AT
    ASSOCIATION TO BENEFIT CHILDREN
    7× · 2018–2024 · $285k · revenue +61%
  • SANCTUARY FOR FAMILIES INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $280k · revenue +32%

Funded once

  • GJ
    GREGORY JACKSON CENTER
    one grant, 2020 · $25k
  • AP
    ACE PROGRAMS FOR THE HOMLESS
    one grant, 2019 · $25k
  • JP
    JEREMIAH PROGRAM NEW YORK
    one grant, 2019 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Friends of Crown Heights Educational Centers Inc

To provide a safe, affordable and comprehensive program of high-quality early childhood education, parental and family support, as well as academic enrichment and recreational programs.

Human Services
2
The Child Center of Ny Inc

The child center of ny strengthens children and families with skills, opportunities, and emotional support to build healthy, successful lives.

—
3
New York Foundling

The new york foundling, in the tradition of openness and compassion of its sponsors, the sisters of charity, helps children, youth, adults, and families in need through services, supports, and advocacy that strengthen family and community…

Human Services
4
Community Action Planning Council of Jefferson County Inc

Community action planning council assists, supports, and empowers people through diverse programs designed to alleviate poverty, promote self-sufficiency, and advance community prosperity.

Human Services
5
Forestdale Inc

Forestdale's mission is to ensure that children have the assets they need to thrive.

Human Services
6
Friends of New York City Nurse Family Partnership

To improve the lives mothers and babies by supporting the new york city nurse-family partnership program (nyc nfp)through financial assistance to enable mothers' self-sufficiency, increase social and community connections, and provide…

Health
7
Nurses for Newborns

Nurses for newborns (the organization) is a not-for-profit missouri corporation whose purpose is to provide home-based services to promote the health, safety, and well-being of babies and their families. the organization has two branches…

Human Services
8
Little Flower Children Family Services of New York

Little flower is committed to improving the well-being of the children, families, and individuals with developmental disabilities across nyc and long island so they can reach their full potential. little flower transforms caring into…

Human Services
9
Under 21

Since 1972, under 21, d.b.a. covenant house new york (chny) has been working with one of new york city's most vulnerable populations - youth experiencing homelessness, age 16-24, and their dependent children. chny provides young people…

Human Services
10
The Committee for Hispanic Children and Families Inc

The organization is dedicated to combining education and advocacy to expand opportunities for children and families in order to strengthen the voice of the latino community based on the belief that the most effective way to support latino…

Human Services
11
Alternatives for Children

To provide quality programs for young children with special needs.

—
12
Chdfs Inc

Provide intensive in-home support to developmentally and emotionally disturbed children and adolescents and their families.

Youth Development
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sanctuary for Families Inc; the most unlike its peers is Reaching Out Community Services Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ASSOCIATION TO BENEFIT CHILDREN: $285,000 · Human ServicesASSOCIATION TO BENEFIT CHILDRENSANCTUARY FOR FAMILIES INC: $280,000 · Human ServicesSANCTUARY FOR FAMILIES INCROOM TO GROW NATIONAL INC: $230,000 · Human ServicesROOM TO GROW NATIONAL INCTHE CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY: $205,000 · Human ServicesTHE CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETYNEW ALTERNATIVES FOR CHILDREN INC: $285,000 · OtherNEW ALTERNATIVES FOR CHILDREN INCNEIGHBORS TOGETHER CORPORATION: $230,000 · OtherNEIGHBORS TOGETHER CORPORATIONACE PROGRAMS FOR THE HOMELESS: $105,000 · OtherACE PROGRAMS FOR THE HOMELESSTHE ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY: $70,000 · OtherTHE ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITYPOWER OF TWO: $50,000 · OtherPOWER OF TWO+5 more: $81,500 · Other+5 moreREACHING OUT COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $235,000 · Food & NutritionREACHING OU…FUND FOR THE CITY OF NEW YORK INC: $180,000 · PhilanthropyJEREMIAH PROGRAM: $75,000 · Housing & Shelter
Human Services$1,000,000Other$821,500Food & Nutrition$235,000Philanthropy$180,000Housing & Shelter$75,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNEW ALTERNATIVES FOR CHILDREN INC: $285,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetASSOCIATION TO BENEFIT CHILDREN: $285,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetSANCTUARY FOR FAMILIES INC: $280,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetREACHING OUT COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $235,000 over 7y, 2.1% of budgetROOM TO GROW NATIONAL INC: $230,000 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetNEIGHBORS TOGETHER CORPORATION: $230,000 over 7y, 3.3% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY: $205,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetFUND FOR THE CITY OF NEW YORK INC: $180,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetJEREMIAH PROGRAM: $75,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NEW ALTERNATIVES FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds ASSOCIATION TO BENEFIT CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds SANCTUARY FOR FAMILIES INC ↗
  • Who funds REACHING OUT COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds ROOM TO GROW NATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds NEIGHBORS TOGETHER CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds FUND FOR THE CITY OF NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds JEREMIAH PROGRAM ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Stern Family Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Stern Family Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Stern Family Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Stern Family Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Stern Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph