Skip to content

· Private foundation

Stephen and Jacquelyn Tate Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$180k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Religion$334kEducation$113kCommunity Improvement$76kHuman Services$46kInternational$40kRecreation & Sports$21kYouth Development$17kFood & Nutrition$11kOther$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k13 grants · $43k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $137k
$5,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$3.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT$30,000
LIVING LEGACY$30,000
MOUNT AIRY CHRISTIAN ACADEMY$30,000
RILEYVILLE BAPTIST CHURCH$15,000
COOPERATIVE AID$12,000
CROSSROADS FREEDOM CENTER$10,000
BREAD AND FISH INC$10,000
MT AIRY BIBLE CHURCH$7,000
FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF GREEN VALLE$6,000
RILEY BAPTIST CHURCH$5,000
NEW BEGINNINGS HOUSE OF WORSHIP$5,000
FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES$5,000
VETERANS MIRACLE CENTER$2,500
YOUNG LIFE - VA23 NEW RIVER VALLEY$2,500
YOUNG LIFE - FREDERICK$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $222k) land where the poverty rate runs at 21%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 95% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%CHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT: $30k → 26%CHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT: $30k → 26%CHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT: $30k → 26%CHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT: $25k → 26%CHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT: $20k → 26%BREAD AND FISH INC: $10k → 6%BREAD AND FISH INC: $500 → 6%BREAD AND FISH INC: $500 → 6%LIVING LEGACY: $30k → 13%LIVING LEGACY: $20k → 13%LIVING LEGACY: $10k → 13%LIVING LEGACY: $7k → 13%LIVING LEGACY: $6k → 13%LIVING LEGACY: $3k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
NY
KY
VA
MD
TN
MS
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 6% of Stephen and Jacquelyn Tate Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Stephen and Jacquelyn Tate Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$632k · 17 repeat orgs$31k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
4

Total granted

$632k
$11k

Still filing today

41%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentReligionHousing & ShelterInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CA
    CHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $135k · revenue +42%
  • FO
    FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES
    6× · 2020–2025 · $21k · revenue +87%
  • CB
    CHILDRENS BIBLE MINISTRIES INC VA
    6× · 2020–2025 · $13k · revenue +174%

Funded once

  • PM
    PATHFINDERS MINISTRY
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • CO
    COMPTON OLE COUNTRY CHURCH
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
His Living Water Projects Inc

Christian ministry

Religion
2
Spirit Invasion Ministries

Spread the Gospel of Jesus Christ

Religion
3
Daybreak Ministry

Teaching the gospel/missions

Religion
4
Footsteps to Joy

Support of Christian ministry

Human Services
5
Christs Victory International Mission of Liberia West Africa Inc

To minister to orphaned and under-privileged children in liberia west africa by providing food, clothing, education, medical care, agricultural projects, and church planting

International
6
Loaves and Fishes Food Shelf
Food & Nutrition
7
Child Evangelism Fellowship Inc Wayne & Pike Counties Epa Chapter

Christian Education

Religion
8
Christian Faith Ministry

Feeding the hungry

Human Services
9
A Blessing to the Nations

Religious ministry

Religion
10
Break-Out Ministries International

Christian Church - Ashland, VA

Religion
11
Cbm Ministries of Md

It is the mission of the Childrens Bible Ministries of Maryland (MD), Inc. to provide religious education to young people and old alike

—
12
Salt and Sea Church Mission Inc

Food bank bible classes and after school programs

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Frederick Rescue Mission Inc; the most unlike its peers is Bread and Fish Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

RILEYVILLE BAPTIST CHURCH: $117,500 · OtherRILEYVILLE BAPTIST CHURCHMOUNT AIRY CHRISTIAN ACADEMY: $110,000 · OtherMOUNT AIRY CHRISTIAN ACADEMYCROSSROADS FREEDOM CENTER: $43,250 · OtherCROSSROADS FREEDOM CENTERFIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF GREEN VALLE: $23,500 · OtherFIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF GREEN VALLEYOUNG LIFE - FREDERICK: $14,750 · OtherRILEY BAPTIST CHURCH: $12,500 · Other+13 more: $45,150 · Other+13 moreCHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT INC: $135,000 · Human ServicesCHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT INCLIVING LEGACY INC: $75,500 · Human ServicesLIVING LEGACY INCBread and Fish Inc: $11,000 · Human ServicesCOOPERATIVE AID INC: $37,700 · InternationalFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $21,250 · Youth DevelopmentCHILDRENS BIBLE MINISTRIES INC VA: $13,000 · ReligionFREDERICK RESCUE MISSION INC: $3,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$366,650Human Services$221,500International$37,700Youth Development$21,250Religion$13,000Housing & Shelter$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT INC: $135,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLIVING LEGACY INC: $75,500 over 6y, 15% of budgetCOOPERATIVE AID INC: $37,700 over 3y, 8.0% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $21,250 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDRENS BIBLE MINISTRIES INC VA: $13,000 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetBread and Fish Inc: $11,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetFREDERICK RESCUE MISSION INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWEEKDAY RELIGIOUS EDUCATION INC: $2,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds LIVING LEGACY INC ↗
  • Who funds COOPERATIVE AID INC ↗
  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES ↗
  • Who funds CHILDRENS BIBLE MINISTRIES INC VA ↗
  • Who funds Bread and Fish Inc ↗
  • Who funds FREDERICK RESCUE MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds SkyTree Book Fairs ↗
  • Who funds WEEKDAY RELIGIOUS EDUCATION INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Stephen and Jacquelyn Tate Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Stephen and Jacquelyn Tate Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Stephen and Jacquelyn Tate Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Stephen and Jacquelyn Tate Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Stephen and Jacquelyn Tate’s filings →

    More from the funding graph