· Private foundation
Stempower Inc
Stempower, inc.'s mission is to provide pre-university students the opportunity to solve societal problems, strengthen nations and implement empowerment through the use of stem education.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2023–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k8 grants · $38k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $24k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $220k
- $250k+3 grants · $1.7M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Individual grant recipient | $716,035 |
| STEM CENTERS ACROSS AFRICA | $671,697 |
| Individual grant recipient | $345,128 |
| Individual grant recipient | $220,095 |
| ABAYIDAYA MENS CLUB ASSOCIATION UGANDA | $23,756 |
| Individual grant recipient | $7,600 |
| RIPPLES OF CHANGE FOUNDATION | $7,370 |
| JEWEL STARFISH FOUNDATION | $7,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,593 |
| UNIVERSITY OF ESWATINI | $4,700 |
| COVENANT HOPE COLLEGE | $3,000 |
| INSPECTION DACADEMIE DE DA | $1,485 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,335 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Where your grant dollars land — across the US and around the world.
Your US giving — 0% of grant dollars ($9k). The 100% that went abroad ($4.3M) is mapped below.
Beyond the US — 100% of all-years giving ($4.3M)
12 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.
International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
7 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $46k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SCSTEM CENTERS ACROSS AFRICA2× · 2023–2024 · $1.4M
- IGIndividual grant recipient2× · 2023–2024 · $1.4M
- IGIndividual grant recipient2× · 2023–2024 · $646k
Funded once
- KUKYAMBOGO UNIVERSITYone grant, 2023 · $7k
- MMMASINDE MULIRO UNIVERSITYone grant, 2023 · $7k
- ZNZAMBIA NATIONAL STEM FOUNDATIONone grant, 2023 · $7k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
0 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2023–2024.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2023–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 0 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Stempower Inc?
Find your warmest path to Stempower Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.