How much did STELLA & ARTHUR PEPPER FOUNDATION INC grant in FY2019?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 50% of STELLA & ARTHUR PEPPER FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

animal care

2019

—

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2019 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2019

Under $10k15 grants · $18k
$10k–50k2 grants · $25k

$1,000

Median grant

States reached

Total assets

Largest grants

AKC CANINE HEALTH FOUNDATION$15,000
NATIONAL DISASTER SEARCH DOG FOUNDATION$10,000
TAKE THE LEAD$5,000
MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER$2,500
UNITED STATES HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL MUSEUM$2,000
FEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA$1,500
AFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION$1,000
GOLDEN RETRIEVER FOUNDATION$1,000
ADELPHI UNIVERSITY$1,000
SALVATION ARMY$1,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$1,000
CLINTON FOUNDATION$500
YOSEMITE CONSERVANCY$500
AMERICARES$500
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL$250

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–18, $500) land where the poverty rate runs at 9% — the area typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$110k · 19 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

19 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2019, 6 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$110k

$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%

+59%

Still filing today

42%

30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2019, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

HealthFood & NutritionAnimalsArts & CultureEducationPublic BenefitOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

ND
NATIONAL DISASTER SEARCH DOG FOUNDATION
3× · 2017–2019 · $31k · revenue +22%
TT
TAKE THE LEAD
3× · 2017–2019 · $15k · revenue +51%
AU
ADELPHI UNIVERSITY
3× · 2017–2019 · $3k · revenue +16%

Funded once

TB
THE BLUES FOUNDATIONgraduated
one grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue +59%
UW
UNITED WAY
one grant, 2017 · $1k
AR
AMERICAN RED CROSS
one grant, 2018 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

The Animal Welfare Foundation

—

National Foundation for Rescued Animals

To provide a safe and secure environment for animals in need of rescue or rehabilitation while conserving endangered and threatened species. our slogan is "saving animals one by one."

Animals

Global Animal Partnership

Animals

Florida Animal Protection Foundation

Animals

New York Academy of Sciences

To advance scientific knowledge and to increase the number of scientifically informed individuals.

—

Humane World Action Fund

To pass animal protection laws, educate the public, and support humane candidates for office.

Animals

Brooks Institute for Animal Rights Law

Philanthropy

Pharm Dog Usa

Pharma Dogs

Animals

American society of animal sci

To discover, disseminate and apply knowledge for sustainable use of animals for food and other human needs

—

United States Law Enforcement

Since the inception of the paralyzed and disabled police officers fund, the united states law enforcement foundation has provided over 690,000 in financial assistance and 270,000 in gifts to police officers who were disabled in the line of…

—

American Museum of Natural History

Nat history museum, planetarium, collections, library, scientific research, graduate school (ph.d./ comp biology & mat/education), education & exhibitions (sch o).

Arts & Culture

Animal Wellness Action

Animal wellness action believes that helping animals helps us all by creating a more civil society where people, animals and nature are in balance.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Jude Children's Research Hospital and the most unlike its peers is Adelphi University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

14 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

14/14

Grantees still filing

13/14

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$61,250Health$30,750Food & Nutrition$17,650Education$3,000Arts & Culture$3,000Animals$3,000Public Benefit$700

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation STELLA & ARTHUR PEPPER FOUNDATION INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: TAKE THE LEAD.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~10 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 8 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up +51% since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 133729133 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on TAKE THE LEAD, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 10 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 1% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Stella & Arthur Pepper Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Stella & Arthur Pepper Foundation Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

STELLA & ARTHUR PEPPER FOUNDATION INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

14 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2024.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Stella & Arthur Pepper Foundation Inc?

More from the funding graph

STELLA & ARTHUR PEPPER FOUNDATION INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

14 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2024.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Stella & Arthur Pepper Foundation Inc?

More from the funding graph