Skip to content
Ste Genevieve Community Services Forum Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Ste Genevieve Community Services Forum Inc

The community services forum seeks to develop ste.

$296k
Granted FY2022
2
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$258k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Community Improvement$1.5MReligion$243kHealth$48kCrime & Legal$25kPublic Safety & Disaster$19kRecreation & Sports$18kEducation$12kPublic Benefit$6k
02FY2022 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 2 grants below total $281,624, the rows itemized in this filing. The $296,240 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $14,616 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2022

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $24k
  • $250k+1 grant · $258k
$258,117
Median grant
1
States reached
$15k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
STE GENEVIEVE COUNTY GOVERNMENT$258,117
STE GENEVIEVE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE$23,507
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%STE GENEVIEVE COUNTY GOVERNMENT: $385k → 10%ST FRANCOIS COUNTY 911 CENTER: $19k → 19%STE GENEVIEVE COUNTY GOVERNMENT: $315k → 10%STE GENEVIEVE COUNTY GOVERNMENT: $258k → 10%STE GENEVIEVE PARISH: $170k → 10%STE GENEVIEVE COUNTY GOVERNMENT: $152k → 10%STE GENEVIEVE COUNTY COMMUNITY CEN: $129k → 10%STE GENEVIEVE COUNTY GOVERNMENT: $83k → 10%STE GENEVIEVE COUNTY COMMUNITY CEN: $66k → 10%STE GENEVIEVE COUNTY COMMUNITY CEN: $48k → 10%STE GENEVIEVE COUNTY GOVERNMENT: $28k → 10%ST JOSEPH CHURCH: $27k → 10%BOARD FOR DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED: $27k → 10%STE GENEVIEVE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPT: $25k → 10%STE GENEVIEVE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $24k → 10%BOARD FOR DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED: $22k → 10%STE GENEVIEVE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $21k → 10%STE GENEVIEVE INDUSTRIES INC: $17k → 10%STE GENEVIEVE COUNTY LIBRARY: $12k → 10%STE GENEVIEVE FLYING CLUB: $10k → 10%STE GENEVIEVE COUNTY ARES: $8k → 10%STE GENEVIEVE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $8k → 10%CITY OF STE GENEVIEVE: $6k → 10%STE GENEVIEVE ROTARY CLUB: $6k → 10%ST AGNES CHURCH: $46k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.6M · 3 repeat orgs$322k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2022, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
10

Total granted

$1.6M
$322k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-22%
+32%

Still filing today

33%
10%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SG
    STE GENEVIEVE COUNTY GOVERNMENT
    6× · 2017–2022 · $1.5M
  • SG
    STE GENEVIEVE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
    3× · 2018–2022 · $52k · revenue -22%
  • BF
    BOARD FOR DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED
    2× · 2017–2021 · $48k

Funded once

  • SG
    STE GENEVIEVE CATHOLIC CHURCH STE GENEVIEVE
    one grant, 2020 · $170k
  • SA
    ST AGNES CATHOLIC CHURCH
    one grant, 2020 · $46k
  • SJ
    ST JOSEPH CHURCH
    one grant, 2020 · $27k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

2 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 2 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
2/2
Grantees still filing
1/2
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

STE GENEVIEVE COUNTY GOVERNMENT: $1,489,561 · OtherSTE GENEVIEVE COUNTY GOVERNMENTSTE GENEVIEVE CATHOLIC CHURCH STE GENEVIEVE: $170,296 · OtherSTE GENEVIEVE CATHOLIC CHURCH STE GENEVIEVE+10 more: $199,900 · Other+10 moreSTE GENEVIEVE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $52,094 · Community Improvement
Other$1,859,757Community Improvement$52,094

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100kgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSTE GENEVIEVE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $52,094 over 3y, 22% of budgetROTARY INTERNATIONAL STE GENEVIEVE ROTARY CLUB: $6,000 over 1y, 18% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds STE GENEVIEVE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
  • Who funds ROTARY INTERNATIONAL STE GENEVIEVE ROTARY CLUB ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Community Foundation …
Community Foundation of the Ozarks IncMO13.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of the Ozarks Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ste Genevieve Community Services Forum Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ste Genevieve Community Services Forum Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record but names no grant recipient (grants abroad are filed by region only, and grants under $5,000 are not itemized), so the figures above are from FY2022, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ste Genevieve Community Services Forum’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home