Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

State Council Charities Knights of Columbus

The primary mission of the state council charities is to provide support for the catholic diocesan program.

$1.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
21
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$181k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 97% of STATE COUNCIL CHARITIES KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 21 grants below total $968,463 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,070,173 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $101,710 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $9k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $327k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $632k
$25,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DIOCESE OF SAN ANGELO$180,892
ARCHDIOCESE OF GALVESTONHOUSTON$139,094
DIOCESE OF AUSTIN$91,818
DIOCESE OF SAN ANTONIO$83,842
DIOCESE OF FORT WORTH$68,696
DIOCESE OF DALLAS$67,864
DIOCESE OF VICTORIA$44,032
DIOCESE OF CORPUS CHRISTI$32,946
ST JOSEPH'S - BAYTOWN$25,000
ST AUGUSTINE CATHOLIC CHURCH$25,000
ST CHRISTOPHER CATHOLIC CHURCH$25,000
CATHOLIC ARCHIVES OF TEXAS$25,000
DIOCESE OF BEAUMONT$24,868
DIOCESE OF BROWNSVILLE$22,985
SPECIAL OLYMPICS$21,770
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 52% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 12%CATHOLIC ARCHIVES OF TEXAS: $38k → 10%DIOCESE OF FORT WORTH: $215k → 11%Diocese of Tyler: $25k → 12%DIOCESE OF SAN ANGELO: $181k → 13%Diocese of Dallas: $72k → 14%ARCHDIOCESE OF SAN ANTONIO: $84k → 16%ST CHRISTOPHER CATHOLIC CHURCH: $25k → 16%DIOCESE OF BEAUMONT: $25k → 19%Diocese of El Paso: $24k → 21%DIOCESE OF BROWNSVILLE: $23k → 23%Archdiocese for the Military Services USA: $61k → 14%CATHOLIC ARCHIVES OF TEXAS: $25k → 10%Diocese of Fort Worth: $214k → 11%Diocese of Tyler: $22k → 12%DIOCESE OF SAN ANGELO: $19k → 13%Diocese of Dallas: $70k → 14%DIOCESE OF SAN ANTONIO: $84k → 16%ST AUGUSTINE CATHOLIC CHURCH: $25k → 16%DIOCESE OF EL PASO: $23k → 21%CATHOLIC ARCHIVES OF TEXAS: $25k → 10%Diocese of Fort Worth: $213k → 11%DIOCESE OF TYLER: $21k → 12%DIOCESE OF DALLAS: $68k → 14%Archdiocese of San Antonio: $76k → 16%DIOCESE OF EL PASO: $21k → 21%CATHOLIC ARCHIVES OF TEXAS: $25k → 10%Diocese of Fort Worth: $209k → 11%DIOCESE OF TYLER: $21k → 12%DIOCESE OF DALLAS: $67k → 14%Archdiocese of San Antonio: $76k → 16%ST JOSEPH'S - BAYTOWN: $25k → 16%Diocese of El Paso: $21k → 21%DIOCESE OF FORT WORTH: $148k → 11%Diocese of Tyler: $20k → 12%Diocese of Dallas: $64k → 14%Archdiocese of San Antonio: $70k → 16%DIOCESE OF FORT WORTH: $69k → 11%Diocese of Dallas: $63k → 14%Archdiocese of San Antonio: $67k → 16%SPECIAL OLYMPICS: $26k → 10%Diocese of Fort Worth: $62k → 11%DIOCESE OF DALLAS: $22k → 14%SPECIAL OLYMPICS: $22k → 16%Special Olympics Texas Inc: $26k → 10%DIOCESE OF FORT WORTH: $59k → 11%SPECIAL OLYMPICS: $21k → 16%Special Olympics Texas Inc: $26k → 10%SPECIAL OLYMPICS: $22k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$4.9M · 17 repeat orgs$211k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +88% since the first grant, against +9% for the ones you funded once.

17 repeat relationships — 17 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
7

Total granted

$4.9M
$136k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+88%
+9%

Still filing today

12%
14%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $75k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Recreation & SportsPhilanthropyEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CD
    CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF FORT WORTH
    8× · 2017–2025 · $1.2M
  • CD
    CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF GALVESTON- HOUSTON
    6× · 2017–2025 · $861k
  • CD
    CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF AUSTIN
    8× · 2017–2025 · $541k

Funded once

  • AF
    ARCHDIOCESE FOR THE MILITARY SERVICES USA
    one grant, 2020 · $61k
  • TT
    TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY SYSTEM
    one grant, 2017 · $50k
  • OL
    Our Lady Queen of Peace Catholic School Incorporated
    one grant, 2024 · $6k · revenue +9%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field
04the grantee network

3 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 3 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
3/3
Grantees still filing
2/3
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF FORT WORTH — $1,187,312 · OtherCATHOLIC DIOCESE OF FORT WORTHCATHOLIC DIOCESE OF GALVESTON- HOUSTON — $861,127 · OtherCATHOLIC DIOCESE OF GALVESTON- HOUSTONCATHOLIC DIOCESE OF AUSTIN — $541,151 · OtherCATHOLIC DIOCESE OF AUSTINARCHDIOCESE OF SAN ANTONIO — $456,870 · OtherARCHDIOCESE OF SAN ANTONIOROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF DALLAS — $426,652 · OtherROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF DALLASOffice of Evangelization and Catechesis - Diocese of Victoria — $292,129 · OtherOffice of Evangelization and Catechesis - Diocese of VictoriaDIOCESE OF SAN ANGELO — $258,633 · Other+17 more — $922,326 · Other+17 moreSPECIAL OLYMPICS OF TEXAS INC — $143,109 · Recreation & SportsKNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS CHARITIES USA INC — $19,351 · PhilanthropyOur Lady Queen of Peace Catholic School Incorporated — $6,000 · Education
Other$4,946,200Recreation & Sports$143,109Philanthropy$19,351Education$6,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS OF TEXAS INC — $143,109 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetKNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS CHARITIES USA INC — $19,351 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetOur Lady Queen of Peace Catholic School Incorporated — $6,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS OF TEXAS INC
  • Who funds KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS CHARITIES USA INC
  • Who funds Our Lady Queen of Peace Catholic School Incorporated

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The John G and Marie Stella Kenedy Memorial FoundationTX38.1× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The John G and Marie Stella Kenedy Memorial Foundation · Scanlan Foundation · Igivecatholic · Our Sunday Visitor Inc · Koch Foundation Inc · Strake Foundation · Knights of Columbus Charitable Fund Inc · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · The US Charitable Gift Trust · Shell USA Company Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Verizon Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization State Council Charities Knights of Columbus funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to State Council Charities Knights of Columbus?

    Find your warmest path to State Council Charities Knights of Columbus through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph