Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Stanly County Partnership for Children

To support the development of children and families through community based programs focusing on health, family support services and quality early education.

$4k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20212025.

Education$490k
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $42k
$12,528
Median grant
1
States reached
$122k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
All Star Learning Center of Stanly County of NC Inc$15,330
Richfield Child Development Center Inc$13,806
Albemarle KidsFirst CDC Inc$12,528
Love-N-Care of Albemarle Inc$8,964
Quality Child Care Center Inc$7,506
Little Friends Learning Center$6,246
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY21–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 0% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%QUALITY CHILD CARE CENTER INC: $15k → 13%All Star Learning Center of Stanly County of NC Inc: $20k → 13%QUALITY CHILD CARE CENTER INC: $13k → 13%ALL STAR LEARNING CENTER OF STANLY COUNTY: $18k → 13%QUALITY CHILD CARE CENTER INC: $11k → 13%ALL STAR LEARNING CENTER OF STANLY COUNTY: $16k → 13%Quality Child Care Center Inc: $10k → 13%All Star Learning Center of Stanly County of NC Inc: $15k → 13%Quality Child Care Center Inc: $8k → 13%ALL STAR LEARNING CENTER OF STANLY COUNTY: $14k → 13%THE SON-SHINE KIDS LEARNING CENTER: $8k → 13%KIDDIE KARE OF ALBEMARLE INC: $25k → 13%KIDDIE KARE OF ALBEMARLE INC: $22k → 13%Albemarle KidsFirst CDC Inc: $19k → 13%KIDDIE KARE OF ALBEMARLE INC: $15k → 13%Love-N-Care of Albemarle Inc: $15k → 13%LOVE-N-CARE OF ALBEMARLE INC: $13k → 13%LOVE-N-CARE OF ALBEMARLE INC: $13k → 13%Albemarle KidsFirst CDC Inc: $13k → 13%J&S BLESSED DAYCARE II LLC: $11k → 13%Little Ones Child Development Center: $10k → 13%LOVE-N-CARE OF ALBEMARLE INC: $9k → 13%Love-N-Care of Albemarle Inc: $9k → 13%LITTLE ONES CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $9k → 13%J&S BLESSED DAYCARE II LLC: $8k → 13%J&S BLESSED DAYCARE II LLC: $8k → 13%LITTLE ONES CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $8k → 13%Little Friends Child Development Center: $8k → 13%J & S Blessed Daycare II LLC: $7k → 13%LITTLE FRIENDS CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $6k → 13%Richfield Child Development Center Inc: $20k → 13%Little Friends Learning Center: $6k → 13%RICHFIELD CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC: $18k → 13%LITTLE ONES CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $6k → 13%RICHFIELD CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC: $18k → 13%KIDS CORNER LEARNING CENTER: $6k → 13%RICHFIELD CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC: $17k → 13%KID'S CORNER LEARNING CENTER: $6k → 13%Richfield Child Development Center Inc: $14k → 13%LITTLE FRIENDS CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $3k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$475k · 10 repeat orgs$14k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
1

Total granted

$475k
$8k

Still filing today

0%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RC
    RICHFIELD CDC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $86k
  • AS
    ALL STAR LEARNING CENTER
    5× · 2021–2025 · $84k
  • KK
    KIDDIE KARE OF ALBEMARLE INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $62k

Funded once

  • TS
    THE SON-SHINE KIDS LEARNING CENTER
    one grant, 2021 · $8k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field
04the grantee network

0 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2021–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20212025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 0 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
0/0
Grantees still filing
0/0
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

RICHFIELD CDC — $86,085 · OtherRICHFIELD CDCALL STAR LEARNING CENTER — $83,546 · OtherALL STAR LEARNING CENTERKIDDIE KARE OF ALBEMARLE INC — $62,345 · OtherKIDDIE KARE OF ALBEMARLE INCLove-N-Care of Albemarle Inc — $58,260 · OtherLove-N-Care of Albemarle IncOAKBORO KIDS CLUB — $57,251 · OtherOAKBORO KIDS CLUBJ&S BLESSED DAYCARE II LLC — $34,134 · OtherJ&S BLESSED DAYCARE II LLCLittle Ones Child Development Center — $33,131 · OtherLittle Ones Child Development CenterAlbemarle KidsFirst CDC Inc — $31,412 · OtherAlbemarle KidsFirst CDC IncLittle Friends Child Development Center — $17,236 · Other+3 more — $26,193 · Other+3 more
Other$489,593

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ your share of their budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Stanly County Partnership for Children?

Find your warmest path to Stanly County Partnership for Children through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph