How much did STAN AND SUZANNE ST PIERRE grant in FY2025?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 75% of STAN AND SUZANNE ST PIERRE’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

servicemengirl scoutsdisaster

2019

girl scoutstheatredisasterchildren'sshriners

2020

plantingtheatrechildren'sdisaster

2021

disaster

2022

disaster

2023

disaster

2024

disaster

2025

—

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2025 · 54 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$300

Median grant

States reached

$580k

Total assets

Largest grants

ST JUDE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$2,000
NAMI-ST TAMMANY$2,000
KAIROS$2,000
ALDINE SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION$1,000
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$600
SALVATION ARMY OF GREATER NEW ORLEA$500
AMERICAN HEART ASSN$500
SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF MIDDLE$500
USO$500
AMERICAN DIABETES ASSN$500
BIG BROTHERS-BIG SISTERS OF MIDDLE$500
WW II MUSEUM$500
MD ANDERSON$400
PLEASANT HILL BAPTIST CEMETERY$300
SCENIC AMERICA$300

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14% — the area typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$234k · 91 repeat orgs$3k to everyone else

91 repeat relationships — 54 still active in FY2025, 37 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$234k

$3k

Still filing today

30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

HealthYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureEducationEnvironmentHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

BO
BATTLE OF FRANKLIN TRUST
8× · 2017–2024 · $8k · revenue +23%
NR
NASHVILLE RESCUE MISSION
8× · 2017–2024 · $7k · revenue +69%
MP
METRO POLICE CHRISTMAS CHARITIES
9× · 2017–2025 · $6k · revenue +94%

Funded once

FC
FIGHT COLONRECTAL CANCER
one grant, 2022 · $666
GS
GIRL SCOUTS TROOP 885
one grant, 2019 · $591
PF
PETERSON FOUND FOR PARKINSONS
one grant, 2024 · $500

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Nashville Zoo Inc

To continue to grow and provide a park/facility that is recognized for excellence in animal care, innovative design and global conservation while delivering strong educational and community value.

Animals

The Land Trust for Tennessee Inc

Conservation of unique character of tennessee's natural & historic landscapes & sites

Environment

Tenngreen Land Conservancy

Conserving land where people and nature can thrive. tenngreen land conservancy works to create parks, establish wildlife corridors, expand existing protected public lands, & enhance public recreation opportunities.

Recreation & Sports

Nashville Public Radio

Nashville public radio is a non-profit, non-commercial public media service. nashville public radio's mission is to create and deliver content essential to understanding your world.

Arts & Culture

Texas Trees Foundation

Plant trees to enhance the beauty and beneficial use of public lands and right-of-ways; expand, maintain and protect the permanence of the urban forest; educate people of all ages to be good stewards of our most important natural resource…

—

Nashville Technology Council

Leading voice & advocate for middle tn's information technology ecosystem & tech professionals.

Community Improvement

Harpeth Conservancy

To restore and protect clean water and healthy ecosystems for rivers in tennessee by employing scientific expertise and collaborative relationships to develop, promote, and support broad community stewardship and action.

Environment

Npr Foundation

—

Federation of State Medical Boards of

Leader in medical regulation, serving as an innovative catalyst for effective policy & standards.

Health

National Committee for Quality Assurance

Our mission: to improve the quality of health care.our vision: to transform health care quality through measurement, transparency and accountability.

Health

Tennessee Pharmacists Association

Advances, protects, and promotes high-quality pharmacist-provided patient care in tennessee.

—

Methodist Medical Center

Methodist Medical Center is a 283-bed full service, acute care hospital located in Oak Ridge, TN. It is a member of the Covenant Health system.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Nashville Rescue Mission and the most unlike its peers is The Heritage Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/30

the rest of the field

13%

5,304/40,222

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

27 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

27/27

Grantees still filing

18/27

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$182,965Youth Development$12,877Health$12,050Arts & Culture$8,800Education$6,850Housing & Shelter$6,750Human Services$6,200

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Hca Healthcare FoundationTN24× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Hca Healthcare Foundation · The Community Foundation of Middle · United Way of Middle Tennessee Inc · Dorothy Cate and Thomas F Frist · The Frist Foundation · Pam Lewis Foundation · Dollar General Literacy Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation STAN AND SUZANNE ST PIERRE funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: LSC FOUNDATION.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~318 months of operating runway; revenue contracted over 7 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

7 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 208188811 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on LSC FOUNDATION, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 318 months of cash on hand.
WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue contracted over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 10% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Stan and Suzanne St Pierre?

Find your warmest path to Stan and Suzanne St Pierre through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

STAN AND SUZANNE ST PIERRE

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

27 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Stan and Suzanne St Pierre?

More from the funding graph

STAN AND SUZANNE ST PIERRE

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

27 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Stan and Suzanne St Pierre?

More from the funding graph