Skip to content
St Peter's Hospital Foundation Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

St Peter's Hospital Foundation Inc

We, st.

$2.7M
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$1.2M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$32MHousing & Shelter$25k
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $50k–250k1 grant · $150k
  • $250k+3 grants · $2.5M
$926,724
Median grant
1
States reached
$19M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SAMARITAN HOSPITAL$1,210,000
ST PETER'S HOSPITAL$926,724
ST PETER'S HEALTH PARTNERS$378,785
THE COMMUNITY HOSPICE INC$150,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–21, $269k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%THE COMMUNITY HOSPICE FOUNDATION INC: $124k → 14%THE COMMUNITY HOSPICE FOUNDATION INC: $81k → 14%THE COMMUNITY HOSPICE FOUNDATION INC: $38k → 14%THE COMMUNITY HOSPICE FOUNDATION INC: $16k → 14%THE COMMUNITY HOSPICE FOUNDATION INC: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$32M · 7 repeat orgs$40k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +39% since the first grant, against +1% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
3

Total granted

$32M
$40k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+1%

Still filing today

100%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SP
    ST PETER'S HOSPITAL
    9× · 2017–2025 · $23M · revenue +39%
  • SH
    SAMARITAN HOSPITAL
    7× · 2019–2025 · $5.1M · revenue +80%
  • SP
    ST PETER'S HEALTH PARTNERS
    7× · 2019–2025 · $2.6M · revenue +35%

Funded once

  • IC
    Interfaith Community Services Inc
    one grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue -12%
  • MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +1%
  • MG
    MASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Seton Health System Inc

We, st. peter's health partners and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. founded in community-based legacies of compassionate healing, we…

—
2
Memorial Hospital Albany Ny

We, st. peter's health partners and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. founded in community-based legacies of compassionate healing, we…

—
3
St Peter's Hospital Foundation Inc

We, st. peter's health partners and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. st. peter's hospital foundation is a member of st. peter's health…

—
4
Seton Health At Schuyler Ridge Residential Healthcare

We, st. peter's health partners and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. seton health at schuyler ridge residential healthcare (schuyler…

Health
5
The Community Hospice Inc

We, st. peter's health partners and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. the community hospice is a member of st. peter's health partners…

Human Services
6
St Peter's Health Partners Medical Associates Pc

We, st. peter's health partners and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities.st. peter's health partners medical associates is a member of st.…

Health
7
The James a Eddy Memorial Geriatric Center Inc

We, st. peter's health partners and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. the james a. eddy memorial geriatric center (eddy memorial…

Health
8
St Joseph's Physician Health Pc

We, st. joseph's physician health and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities.

Health
9
Senior Care Connection Inc

We, st. peter's health partners and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. senior care connection is a member of st. peter's health partners…

—
10
Saint Mary Home Incorporated

We, mercy community health and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming presence within our communities. saint mary home is a member of mercy community health and trinity health.

—
11
Heritage House Nursing Center Inc

We, st. peter's health partners and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. heritage house nursing center is a member of st. peter's health…

Health
12
Home Aide Service of Eastern New York Inc

We, st. peter's health partners and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. home aide service of eastern new york is a member of st. peter's…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Peter's Hospital; the most unlike its peers is Muscular Dystrophy Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST PETER'S HOSPITAL: $22,679,062 · HealthST PETER'S HOSPITALSAMARITAN HOSPITAL: $5,069,934 · HealthSAMARITAN HOSPITALST PETER'S HEALTH PARTNERS: $2,571,641 · HealthST PETER'S HEALTH PARTNERS+4 more: $1,196,458 · HealthTHE COMMUNITY HOSPICE FOUNDATION INC: $269,306 · Human ServicesTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR THE GREATER CAPITAL REGION INC: $89,079 · PhilanthropyInterfaith Community Services Inc: $25,000 · OtherMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED: $5,000 · Other
Health$31,517,095Human Services$269,306Philanthropy$89,079Other$30,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetST PETER'S HOSPITAL: $22,679,062 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetSAMARITAN HOSPITAL: $5,069,934 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetST PETER'S HEALTH PARTNERS: $2,571,641 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetSAMARITAN HOSPITAL AND THE EDDY FOUNDATION: $1,007,891 over 7y, 6.1% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY HOSPICE FOUNDATION INC: $269,306 over 5y, 4.3% of budgetSUNNYVIEW HOSPITAL AND REHABILITATION CENTER: $159,033 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR THE GREATER CAPITAL REGION INC: $89,079 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetInterfaith Community Services Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetVILLA MARY IMMACULATE: $19,534 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Samaritan Hospital an…Keeler Motor Car Comp…The McCarthy Charitie…United Way of the Gre…The Community Foundat…The Bank of America C…
Samaritan Hospital and the Eddy FoundationNY13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Samaritan Hospital and the Eddy Foundation · Keeler Motor Car Company Charitable Foundation · The McCarthy Charities Inc · United Way of the Greater Capital Region · The Community Foundation for the Greater Capital Region Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization St Peter's Hospital Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from St Peter's Hospital Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on St Peter's Hospital’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home