Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

St Mary Medical Center

As expressions of god's healing love, witnessed through the ministry of jesus, we are steadfast in serving all, especially those who are poor and vulnerable.

$1.7M
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$1.6M
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Health$13MEducation$81kHuman Services$9kYouth Development$8k
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $61k
  • $250k+1 grant · $1.6M
$45,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$622M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST JUDE NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CENTERS$1,616,051
MILLIONAIRE MIND KIDS$45,000
LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER$15,508
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 44% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 9%ST JUDE NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CENTERS: $2.4M → 10%GLOBAL INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC INSTITUTE: $8k → 11%LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER: $16k → 14%ST JOSEPH HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION: $2.2M → 9%ST JUDE NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CENTERS: $1.6M → 10%SEVENTH-DAY ADVENTISTS LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER: $75k → 14%ST JOSEPH HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION: $1.7M → 9%ST JOSEPH HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION: $1.5M → 10%ST JOHN OF GOD: $9k → 14%ST JOSEPH HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION: $1.7M → 9%MILLIONAIRE MIND KIDS: $45k → 14%ST JOSEPH HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION: $1.6M → 9%MILLIONAIRE MIND KIDS (MMK): $36k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$13M · 3 repeat orgs$107k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +66% since the first grant, against -43% for the ones you funded once.

3 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
3

Total granted

$13M
$92k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+66%
-43%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’24
HealthEducationYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SJ
    ST JOSEPH HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION
    5× · 2017–2021 · $8.7M · revenue -36%
  • SJ
    ST JUDE NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CENTERS
    3× · 2022–2024 · $4.1M · revenue +66%
  • MM
    MILLIONAIRE MIND KIDS
    2× · 2021–2024 · $81k · revenue +315%

Funded once

  • LL
    LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $75k · revenue +31%
  • SJ
    ST JOHN OF GOD HEALTH CARE SERVICES
    one grant, 2017 · $9k · revenue -43%
  • GI
    GLOBAL INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC STRATEGIES
    one grant, 2021 · $8k · revenue -100%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
4/7
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ST JOSEPH HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION — $8,663,960 · HealthST JOSEPH HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATIONST JUDE NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CENTERS — $4,065,659 · HealthST JUDE NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CENTERS+1 more — $75,017 · HealthMILLIONAIRE MIND KIDS (MMK) — $81,242 · EducationLOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY MED CNTR-MURRIETA — $15,508 · OtherST JOHN OF GOD HEALTH CARE SERVICES — $8,500 · OtherGLOBAL INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC STRATEGIES — $8,400 · Youth Development
Health$12,804,636Education$81,242Other$24,008Youth Development$8,400

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetST JOSEPH HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION — $8,663,960 over 5y, 19% of budgetST JUDE NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CENTERS — $4,065,659 over 3y, 15% of budgetMILLIONAIRE MIND KIDS (MMK) — $81,242 over 2y, 16% of budgetLOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER — $75,017 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY MED CNTR-MURRIETA — $15,508 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JOHN OF GOD HEALTH CARE SERVICES — $8,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetGLOBAL INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC STRATEGIES — $8,400 over 1y, 7.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization St Mary Medical Center funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 7 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph