Skip to content

· Public charity

St Luke's Health Foundation Ltd

St.

$11M
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$8.2M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$66MHuman Services$10k
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 16 grants below total $10,630,843, the rows itemized in this filing. The $11,269,993 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $639,150 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $24k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $174k
  • $250k+4 grants · $10M
$20,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$101M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
St Luke's Regional Medical Center Ltd$8,151,506
St Luke's Magic Valley Regional Medical Center Ltd$1,017,402
St Luke's Health System Ltd$784,804
St Luke's Nampa Medical Center Ltd$478,859
Harmon Killebrew-Danny Thompson Memorial Cancer Foundation Inc$38,000
St Luke's Health Partners$30,400
Primary Therapy Source LLC$26,000
Orthopro Of Twin Falls$20,000
Clear Source Therapy$20,000
Twin Falls Optimist Club Inc$10,000
Unlimited Potential Athletics$10,000
Omni Kids$10,000
Bishop Kelly Foundation Inc$10,000
Pacific Lutheran University$9,293
St Luke's Wood River Medical Center$7,379
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%St Luke's Magic Valley Regional Medical Center Ltd: $703k → 11%Killebrew Thompson Memorial: $68k → 7%St Luke's Regional Medical Center Ltd: $19.5M → 8%St Luke's Magic Valley Regional Medical Center Ltd: $594k → 11%Harmon Killebrew-Danny Thompson Memorial Cancer Foundation Inc: $38k → 7%St Luke's Regional Medical Center Ltd: $8.2M → 8%Primary Therapy Source LLC: $26k → 11%Harmon Killebrew-Danny Thompson Memorial Cancer Foundation Inc: $38k → 7%St Luke's Regional Medical Center Ltd: $7.2M → 8%Clear Source Therapy: $20k → 11%Harmon Killebrew-Danny Thompson Memorial Cancer Foundation Inc: $38k → 7%St Luke's Regional Medical Center Ltd: $7.1M → 8%Killebrew Thompson Memorial: $28k → 7%St Luke's Regional Medical Center Ltd: $5.2M → 8%St Luke's Regional Medical Center Ltd: $3.4M → 8%St Luke'S Regional Medical Center Ltd: $3.2M → 8%St Luke's Regional Medical Center Ltd: $2.7M → 8%Mountain States Tumor Institute Inc: $1.5M → 8%St Luke's Regional Medical Center Ltd: $1.5M → 8%Mountain States Tumor Institute Inc: $1.2M → 8%Mountain States Tumor Institute Inc: $1.1M → 8%Mountain States Tumor Institute Inc: $1.1M → 8%St Luke's Health System Ltd: $1.0M → 8%St Luke's Health System Ltd: $1.0M → 8%St Luke's Magic Valley Regional Medical Center Ltd: $1.0M → 8%St Luke's Magic Valley Regional Medical Center Ltd: $862k → 8%St Luke's Health System Ltd: $785k → 8%St Luke'S Magic Valley Regional Medical Center Ltd: $776k → 8%St Luke's Magic Valley Regional Medical Center Ltd: $758k → 8%St Luke's Health System Ltd: $713k → 8%St Luke's Nampa Medical Center Ltd: $562k → 8%St Luke's Magic Valley Regional Medical Center Ltd: $536k → 8%St Luke's Nampa Medical Center Ltd: $522k → 8%St Luke'S Health System Ltd: $520k → 8%St Luke's Health System Ltd: $507k → 8%St Luke's Magic Valley Regional Medical Center Ltd: $483k → 8%St Luke's Nampa Medical Center Ltd: $479k → 8%St Luke's Magic Valley Regional Medical Center Ltd: $454k → 8%St Luke's Nampa Medical Center Ltd: $393k → 8%St Luke's Health System Ltd: $295k → 8%St Luke's Nampa Medical Center Ltd: $276k → 8%St Luke's Health System Ltd: $180k → 8%St Luke's Health System Ltd: $104k → 8%St Lukes Nampa Medical Center Ltd: $46k → 8%St Luke's Nampa Medical Center Ltd: $45k → 8%St Luke's Health Partners: $44k → 8%St Luke'S Nampa Medical Center Ltd: $34k → 8%St Luke's Health Partners: $30k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$77M · 9 repeat orgs$161k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
3

Total granted

$77M
$67k

Still filing today

56%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $94k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SL
    St Luke's Regional Medical Center Ltd
    9× · 2017–2025 · $58M · revenue +123%
  • SL
    St Luke's Magic Valley Regional Medical Center Ltd
    9× · 2017–2025 · $6.2M · revenue +55%
  • SL
    St Luke's Health System Ltd
    9× · 2017–2025 · $5.2M · revenue +96%

Funded once

  • SL
    St Luke's Health Partners
    one grant, 2024 · $44k
  • MV
    Magic Valley Behavioral Health PLLC
    one grant, 2024 · $13k
  • GC
    Gemstone Climbing Center LLC
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
St Luke's McCall Ltd

To improve the health of people in the communities we serve.

Health
2
Rural Idaho & Mountain West Primary Care
Health
3
St Luke's Health Foundation Ltd

St. Luke's Health Foundation is a not-for-profit organization established to develop philanthropic resources that support St. Luke's mission "To improve the health of people in the communities we serve." We're responsible for cultivating…

Health
4
Saint Francis Hospital Inc

To extend the presence and healing ministry of christ in all we do.

Health
5
Fort Loudoun Medical Center

Fort Loudoun Medical Center provides quality healthcare, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health, regardless of a patient's ability to pay.

Health
6
Saint Alphonsus Regional Medical Center Inc

We, saint alphonsus health system and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. saint alphonsus regional medical center is a member of saint…

Health
7
Legacy Salmon Creek Hospital

Legacy Salmon Creek Hospital (LSCH), established in 2005, provides acute and critical care in Vancouver, with 165 licensed beds. LSCH operates adult, pediatric, and OB/GYN hospitalist programs, as well as four primary care physician…

Health
8
Ssm Health Care of Oklahoma Inc

Through our exceptional health care services, we reveal the healing presence of god.

Health
9
Sutter Valley Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
10
Fort Sanders Regional Medical Center

Fort Sanders Regional Medical Center provides quality healthcare, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health, regardless of a patient's ability to pay.

Health
11
Legacy Meridian Park Hospital

Legacy Meridian Park Hospital (LMPH), established in 1973, is a community hospital in Tualatin, OR, south of Portland with 150 licensed beds. LMPH serves the needs of the fast growing communities of Tualatin, Tigard, Wilsonville, Sherwood,…

Health
12
St Luke's Hospital of Bethlehem Pa

The mission of the organization is to provide compassionate, excellent quality and cost effective healthcare to the residents of the communities we serve regardless of race, color, creed, sex, national origin or ability to pay. the…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Luke's Nampa Medical Center Ltd; the most unlike its peers is Optimist Club of Twin Falls. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

St Luke's Regional Medical Center Ltd: $57,890,936 · HealthSt Luke's Regional Medical Center LtdSt Luke's Magic Valley Regional Medical Center Ltd: $6,184,102 · HealthSt Luke's Magic Valley Regional Medical Center LtdSt Luke's Health System Ltd: $5,177,693 · HealthSt Luke's Health System Ltd+3 more: $2,604,143 · HealthMountain States Tumor Institute Inc: $4,954,843 · Other+11 more: $219,900 · OtherPacific Lutheran University: $9,293 · Education
Health$71,856,874Other$5,174,743Education$9,293

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSt Luke's Regional Medical Center Ltd: $57,890,936 over 9y, 1.2% of budgetSt Luke's Magic Valley Regional Medical Center Ltd: $6,184,102 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetSt Luke's Health System Ltd: $5,177,693 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetMountain States Tumor Institute Inc: $4,954,843 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetSt Luke's Nampa Medical Center Ltd: $2,356,164 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetHARMON KILLEBREW-DANNY THOMPSON MEMORIAL CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $210,200 over 5y, 4.9% of budgetSt Luke's Wood River Medical Center Ltd: $37,779 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBISHOP KELLY FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetOPTIMIST CLUB OF TWIN FALLS: $10,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetPacific Lutheran University: $9,293 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds St Luke's Regional Medical Center Ltd ↗
  • Who funds St Luke's Magic Valley Regional Medical Center Ltd ↗
  • Who funds St Luke's Health System Ltd ↗
  • Who funds Mountain States Tumor Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds St Luke's Nampa Medical Center Ltd ↗
  • Who funds HARMON KILLEBREW-DANNY THOMPSON MEMORIAL CANCER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds St Luke's Wood River Medical Center Ltd ↗
  • Who funds BISHOP KELLY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds OPTIMIST CLUB OF TWIN FALLS ↗
  • Who funds Pacific Lutheran University ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization St Luke's Health Foundation Ltd funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from St Luke's Health Foundation Ltd. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to St Luke's Health Foundation Ltd?

    Find your warmest path to St Luke's Health Foundation Ltd through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on St Luke's Health Foundation Ltd’s filings →

    More from the funding graph