Skip to content
St Ann's Foundation Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

St Ann's Foundation Inc

Since our founding in 1874, our mission has been to promote the highest levels of independence, physical and spiritual well-being of older adults in the catholic tradition of excellence in care and services.

$3.6M
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$2.4M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$31MHousing & Shelter$124k
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 4 grants below total $2,466,601, the rows itemized in this filing. The $3,602,666 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $1,136,065 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $30k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $51k
  • $250k+1 grant · $2.4M
$50,975
Median grant
1
States reached
$42M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST ANN'S HOME FOR THE AGED$2,385,842
CHAPEL OAKS INC$50,975
ST ANN'S NURSING HOME COMPANY INC (THE HERITAGE)$16,384
ST ANN'S SENIOR HOUSING INC$13,400
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $1.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ST ANN'S OF GREATER ROCHESTER INC: $576k → 14%ST ANN'S OF GREATER ROCHESTER INC: $445k → 14%ST ANN'S OF GREATER ROCHESTER INC: $420k → 14%ST ANN'S SENIOR HOUSING INC (CHERRY RIDGE): $46k → 14%ST ANN'S SENIOR HOUSING INC (CHERRY RIDGE): $42k → 14%ST ANN'S SENIOR HOUSING INC (CHERRY RIDGE): $23k → 14%ST ANN'S SENIOR HOUSING INC: $13k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field
04the grantee network

4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2024, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 5 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
4/4
Grantees still filing
4/4
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST ANN'S HOME FOR THE AGED: $28,681,162 · HealthST ANN'S HOME FOR THE AGEDST ANN'S SENIOR HOUSING INC: $1,564,402 · Human ServicesCHAPEL OAKS INC: $331,404 · Housing & ShelterST ANN'S NURSING HOME COMPANY INC: $190,337 · OtherBLESSED KATERI TEKAKWITHA CHURCH: $8,000 · Other
Health$28,681,162Human Services$1,564,402Housing & Shelter$331,404Other$198,337

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetST ANN'S HOME FOR THE AGED: $28,681,162 over 8y, 12% of budgetST ANN'S SENIOR HOUSING INC: $1,564,402 over 4y, 6.3% of budgetCHAPEL OAKS INC: $331,404 over 4y, 3.7% of budgetST ANN'S NURSING HOME COMPANY INC: $190,337 over 8y, 0.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ST ANN'S HOME FOR THE AGED ↗
  • Who funds ST ANN'S SENIOR HOUSING INC ↗
  • Who funds CHAPEL OAKS INC ↗
  • Who funds ST ANN'S NURSING HOME COMPANY INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization St Ann's Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from St Ann's Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 5 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on St Ann's’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home