Skip to content
Southwire Cares Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Southwire Cares Inc

To provide emergency assistance to employees of southwire company whoface financial hardship and to fund programs benefitting the communityin which employees live and work.

$1.7M
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Philanthropy$153kFood & Nutrition$87kInternational$41kReligion$15kHealth$6k
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 3 grants below total $60,826, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,679,549 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $1,618,723 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $56k
$21,325
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TOYS FOR TOTS$34,501
WATER MISSION$21,325
LIFELINE MISSIONS$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 95% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $6k → 17%WATER MISSION: $21k → 12%PROJECT HOPE: $7k → 14%SECOND HARVEST: $8k → 13%FOOD FOR THE POOR: $13k → 13%CHILDREN INTERNATIONAL: $13k → 15%LIFELINE MISSIONS: $5k → 13%FEEDING AMERICA: $27k → 14%TOYS FOR TOTS: $12k → 7%LIFELINE MISSIONS: $5k → 13%FEEDING AMERICA: $6k → 14%TOYS FOR TOTS: $48k → 13%TOYS FOR TOTS: $45k → 13%TOYS FOR TOTS: $35k → 13%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $8k → 13%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MO
KY
VA
SC
DC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$198k · 4 repeat orgs$90k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +59% since the first grant, against +7% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
6

Total granted

$198k
$69k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+59%
+7%

Still filing today

75%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $21k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalFood & NutritionPhilanthropyReligionPublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MT
    MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION
    7× · 2017–2024 · $140k · revenue +59%
  • Feeding America
    2× · 2020–2023 · $33k · revenue +40%
  • LM
    LIFELINE MISSION INC
    2× · 2022–2024 · $10k · revenue +152%

Funded once

  • FA
    FEEDING AMERICA KENTUCKY'S HEARTLAND INC
    one grant, 2022 · $23k · revenue +14%
  • FOOD FOR THE POOR INC
    one grant, 2020 · $13k · revenue -45%
  • CI
    Children International
    one grant, 2020 · $13k · revenue -72%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Central Pennsylvania Food Bank

Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…

Food & Nutrition
2
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
3
The Maryland Food Bank Inc

The maryland food bank is a nonprofit hunger-relief organization dedicated to feeding people, strengthening communities, and ending hunger for more marylanders.

—
4
The Food Bank for Central & Northeast Missouri

The food bank for central & northeast missouri is a regional disaster and hunger relief network that acquires and distributes millions of meals each year to help neighbors get the food they need to thrive. (continued on schedule o)the…

Food & Nutrition
5
Food Bank of Central & Eastern Nc Inc

Nourish people. build solutions. empower communities. no one goes hungry.

Food & Nutrition
6
The Food Bank for Larimer County

To provide food to all in need through community partnerships and hunger relief programs. Our vision is a hunger-free Larimer County.

Food & Nutrition
7
Food for the Hungry Inc

Food for the hungry is a christian humanitarian aid and global development organization that has designed, developed and delivered solutions for more than 50 years so that children, families and communities can flourish. (continued on…

International
8
The Global FoodBanking Network

To nourish the world's hungry through uniting and advancing food banks.

International
9
Community Food Bank of New Jersey Inc

We serve as a champion for addressing the root causes of hunger, delivering neighbor-centric solutions, and fostering collaborative partnerships across all sectors of society for New Jersey.

Food & Nutrition
10
Harvest Hope Food Bank

Harvest hope is on a mission to eliminate hunger and food insecurity in south carolina. we rescue nutritious food from stores throughout the state and distribute it to food pantries, shelters, and soup kitchens. we operate programs that…

Food & Nutrition
11
Feeding San Diego

On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…

Food & Nutrition
12
Regional Food Bank of Oklahoma Inc

The mission of the regional food bank of oklahoma is to lead a network that provides nutritious food and pathways to self-sufficiency for people facing hunger. our vision is an oklahoma where no one goes hungry.

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Food for the Poor Inc; the most unlike its peers is Lifeline Mission Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $139,960 · PhilanthropyMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATIONCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF W GEORGIA: $13,104 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF W GEORGIAFeeding America: $32,771 · Food & NutritionFeeding AmericaFEEDING AMERICA KENTUCKY'S HEARTLAND INC: $22,530 · Food & NutritionFEEDING AMERICA KENT…WATER MISSIONS INTERNATIONAL: $21,325 · InternationalWATER MISSIONS INTER…FOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $12,950 · InternationalFOOD FOR THE POOR IN…Children International: $12,640 · InternationalChildren Internation…PROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $6,595 · InternationalPROJECT HOPE - THE P…HOPE FOR THE JOURNEY: $15,005 · OtherSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC: $8,302 · OtherLIFELINE MISSION INC: $10,000 · ReligionTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $5,505 · Public Safety & Disaster
Philanthropy$153,064Food & Nutrition$55,301International$53,510Other$23,307Religion$10,000Public Safety & Disaster$5,505

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $139,960 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $32,771 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFEEDING AMERICA KENTUCKY'S HEARTLAND INC: $22,530 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWATER MISSIONS INTERNATIONAL: $21,325 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF W GEORGIA: $13,104 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetFOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $12,950 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChildren International: $12,640 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIFELINE MISSION INC: $10,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC: $8,302 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $6,595 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $5,505 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Southwire Cares Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Southwire Cares Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Second Harvest Food Bank of Central Florida Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Food for the Poor Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Southwire Cares’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home