Skip to content
Southwest Idaho Resource Conservation and Development Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Southwest Idaho Resource Conservation and Development Inc

To enhance the quality of life for residents of rc&d area by identifying problems, setting common objectives, goals, implementing projects, by providing planning, education, and technical assistance for conservation and development of natural resources.

$198k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Environment$1.5MRecreation & Sports$1.4MHousing & Shelter$45kAnimals$20kCivil Rights$18kHealth$15kArts & Culture$8k
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 9 grants below total $146,917, the rows itemized in this filing. The $197,689 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $50,772 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $26k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $121k
$17,822
Median grant
1
States reached
$199k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MIL BROS EXCAVATION LLC$25,000
TORCH FIRE AND SECURITY LLC$24,991
Individual grant recipient$21,500
Individual grant recipient$20,000
LOAM IMPROVEMENT LLC$17,822
BLACKLINE CONSULTING LLC$11,273
3 FINGERS MEDIATION$9,935
SISU CONSULTING AND TRAINING$9,340
SPATIAL INTEREST LLC$7,056
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 30% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%GESTRIN WELL DRILLING: $13k → 8%IDAHO POWER COMPANY: $23k → 8%HOPKINS EVERGREENS LLC: $10k → 11%SURPRISE VALLEY HOA: $47k → 11%THE GOAT YARD: $22k → 13%COMFORT ZONE HEATING AND COOLING: $8k → 14%DJ1 LLC: $45k → 10%TDX POWER SERVICES INC: $511k → 22%SOLAR PATH INC: $9k → 14%TYCO STRUCTURAL ENTERPRISES INC: $8k → 8%LOAM IMPROVEMENT LLC: $18k → 8%MARTIN LANDING CAMPGROUND: $8k → 11%SURPRISE VALLEY HOA: $30k → 11%JASON MONTGOMERY TRUCKING: $20k → 13%TDX POWER SERVICES INC: $31k → 22%IDAHO TREE PROFESSIONALS LLC: $10k → 8%THE GOAT YARD: $17k → 13%GRANITE EXCAVATION INC: $752k → 8%EAGLE FIRE DEPARTMENT: $40k → 8%3 FINGERS MEDIATION: $15k → 13%GRANITE EXCAVATION INC: $585k → 8%NORRIS KRUEGER PHD: $8k → 8%3 FINGERS MEDIATION: $13k → 13%IDAHO POWER COMPANY: $206k → 8%RICK BRENNEMAN: $36k → 8%3 FINGERS MEDIATION: $12k → 13%SPATIAL INTEREST LLC: $11k → 8%3 FINGERS MEDIATION: $11k → 13%SPATIAL INTEREST LLC: $9k → 8%MIL BROS EXCAVATION LLC: $25k → 8%3 FINGERS MEDIATION: $11k → 13%SPATIAL INTEREST LLC: $7k → 8%SISU CONSULTING AND TRAINING: $9k → 8%3 FINGERS MEDIATION: $10k → 13%SISU CONSULTING AND TRAINING: $8k → 8%3 FINGERS MEDIATION (PAUL LITOW): $9k → 13%J-U-B ENGINEERS THE LANGDON GROUP: $26k → 8%3 FINGERS MEDIATION (PAUL LITOW): $7k → 13%JUB ENGINEERS THE LANDON GROUP: $16k → 8%J-U-B ENGINEERS THE LANGDON GROUP: $15k → 8%JUB ENGINEERS THE LANDON GROUP: $14k → 8%PATHWAYS OF IDAHO: $10k → 8%JUB ENGINEERS THE LANDON GROUP: $12k → 8%PATHWAYS OF IDAHO: $9k → 8%JUB ENGINEERS THE LANDON GROUP: $12k → 8%PATHWAYS OF IDAHO: $8k → 8%BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT: $8k → 8%BLACKLINE CONSULTING LLC: $11k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 56% of Southwest Idaho Resource Conservation and Development Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 80% of the giving stays in ID; by stated purpose, 22%.

Southwest Idaho Resource Conservation and Development Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 59% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.4M · 11 repeat orgs$561k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
21

Total granted

$2.4M
$487k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-60%
+24%

Still filing today

9%
5%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 50% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $74k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GE
    GRANITE EXCAVATION INC
    2× · 2019–2021 · $1.3M
  • TP
    TDX POWER SERVICES INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $543k
  • TF
    TORCH FIRE AND SECURITY LLC
    3× · 2021–2024 · $144k

Funded once

  • IP
    IDAHO POWER COMPANY VOLUNTARY EMPLOYEES BENEFICIARY ASSOC
    one grant, 2022 · $206k · revenue +24%
  • DL
    DJ1 LLC
    one grant, 2021 · $45k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $40k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
05the grantee network

2 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2024, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 2 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
2/2
Grantees still filing
1/2
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GRANITE EXCAVATION INC: $1,336,717 · OtherGRANITE EXCAVATION INCTDX POWER SERVICES INC: $542,620 · OtherTDX POWER SERVICES INCIDAHO POWER COMPANY VOLUNTARY EMPLOYEES BENEFICIARY ASSOC: $206,298 · OtherIDAHO POWER COMPANY VOLUNTARY EMPLOYEES BENEFICIARY ASSOCTORCH FIRE AND SECURITY LLC: $144,199 · Other+31 more: $736,326 · Other+31 moreSOUTHWEST IDAHO RESOURCE CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT INC: $17,944 · Environment
Other$2,966,160Environment$17,944

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetIDAHO POWER COMPANY VOLUNTARY EMPLOYEES BENEFICIARY ASSOC: $206,298 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSOUTHWEST IDAHO RESOURCE CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT INC: $17,944 over 2y, 1.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds IDAHO POWER COMPANY VOLUNTARY EMPLOYEES BENEFICIARY ASSOC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHWEST IDAHO RESOURCE CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Southwest Idaho Resource Conservation and Development Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Southwest Idaho Resource Conservation and Development Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Southwest Idaho Resource Conservation and Development Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Southwest Idaho Resource Conservation and Development Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Southwest Idaho Resource Conservation and Development’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home