Skip to content

· Public charity

Southwest Behavioral Health Services Inc

We inspire people to feel better and reach their potential.

$311k
Granted FY2025still arriving
—
Grants FY2025still arriving
—
States reached
—
Largest
01What it funds
01FY2025

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$0
Median grant
—
States reached
$76M
Total assets
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Epi-Hab Phoenix Inc
Unclassified
2
La Frontera Housing Inc

Housing for persons with disabilities.

Housing & Shelter
3
Mother Hubbard Sober Living Ii

Provide shelter to homeless

Housing & Shelter
4
Piazza Apartments

Operation of low income housing for the elderly and handicapped. regulated and assisted by the department of housing and urban development (hud).

Housing & Shelter
5
Lowell Area Housing Inc Dba Schneider Manor
—
6
Arbor Housing Associates

Provide low income housing to the mentally ill

Health
7
Step Up Bisbee-Naco Inc

The rehabilitation of homes for low-income housing and repairs to existing homes of low-income home owners.

Human Services
8
Two Inc

Group Home for Mentally DIsabled

—
9
Nba Tucson Housing Inc

The mission of nba tucson housing, inc. is to provide decent, safe, sanitary housing and supportive services that enhance the well-being and quality of life for very low income elderly persons.

—
10
First Place - Phoenix Transitional Homes

Housing low-income adults with autism & other neurodiversities.

Housing & Shelter
11
Tex Elderly Housing Inc
—
12
Southeastern Arizona Behavioral Health Services Inc

Our mission is continually to improve the quality of life for the people we serve in collaboration with our diverse communities in a respectful, caring, culturally sensitive manner. The organization provides behavioral health services for…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Toby House Vi Inc; the most unlike its peers is Villa De Confianza. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph