Skip to content
Southeastern Universities Research Association Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Southeastern Universities Research Association Inc

Sura's mission is to advance collaborative research and education and to strengthen the scientific capabilities of its members and our nation.

$15k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

Science & Tech$119kEducation$81k
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$15,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$54M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY22–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 75% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $22k → 8%STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY: $10k → 7%THE GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $13k → 14%DUKE UNIVERSITY: $10k → 11%GORDON RESEARCH CONFERENCES: $6k → 7%MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY: $11k → 24%OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $58k → 19%VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY: $15k → 21%MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $12k → 8%THE GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $13k → 14%OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $33k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
RI
VA
NC
DC
MS
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

71%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$129k · 3 repeat orgs$52k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +68% since the first grant, against +18% for those funded once.

3 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
4

Total granted

$129k
$37k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+68%
+18%

Still filing today

67%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
EducationScience & TechOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OD
    OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION
    2× · 2022–2023 · $91k · revenue +68%
  • TG
    The George Washington University
    2× · 2022–2023 · $26k · revenue +18%
  • TF
    THE FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2022–2023 · $12k

Funded once

  • MS
    MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2022 · $11k
  • DUKE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue +6%
  • SB
    STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/5
Grantees still filing
5/5
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $90,840 · EducationOLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATIONMassachusetts Institute of Technology: $34,000 · EducationMassachusetts Institute of TechnologyThe George Washington University: $26,057 · EducationThe George Washington UniversityDUKE UNIVERSITY: $10,000 · EducationDUKE UNIVERSITYVIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY: $15,000 · OtherVIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INST…THE FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY: $12,000 · OtherTHE FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL…MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY: $11,000 · OtherMISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERS…STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY: $10,000 · OtherSTONY BROOK UNIVERSITYGORDON RESEARCH CONFERENCES INC: $6,000 · Science & Tech
Education$160,897Other$48,000Science & Tech$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $90,840 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMassachusetts Institute of Technology: $34,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe George Washington University: $26,057 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGORDON RESEARCH CONFERENCES INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Southeastern Universities Research Association Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Southeastern Universities Research Association Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 26%
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology: 26% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Southeastern Universities Research Association’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home