· Public charity
South Texas Youth Soccer Association
Soccer education, training, and competition.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2022.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 2 grants below total $20,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $23,200 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $3,200 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Angleton Soccer Club | $10,000 |
| Hays Youth Soccer Association | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 65% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 6% of South Texas Youth Soccer Association’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 84% of the giving stays in TX; read by stated purpose it is 88% — more of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +31% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
5 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2022, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2022, 50% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GCGulf Coast Youth Soccer Club Inc2× · 2017–2018 · $20k · revenue +89%
- ASANGLETON SOCCER CLUB2× · 2021–2022 · $20k · revenue +4%
- CBCoastal Bend Youth Soccer Association2× · 2017–2018 · $15k · revenue +31%
Funded once
- DSDICKS SPORTING GOODS OPENone grant, 2018 · $29k
- ASAmerican Soccer Co Incone grant, 2017 · $10k
- STSOUTH TEXAS YOUTH SOCCER ASSOCIATIONone grant, 2020 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Soccer activities soccer club/soccer games/soccer practices/soccer tournaments.
Promote youth soccer
To provide quality soccer to our community.
Kysa registers youth soccer players to the south texas soccer association. as part of this program, kysa hosts tournaments and participates in tournaments sponsored by other soccer programs.
To provide recreation and competitive soccer programming to youth in the southern brazoria county/bay city areas.
Non profit youth soccer program
Kysc operates a soccer league for children ages 4-18.
Youth Soccer
Soccer league
The york youth soccer league (yysl) is a non profit organization dedicated to providing the youth of york county with the opportunity to participate in a recreational soccer league.
Youth Soccer Recreation & Competitive
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Gulf Coast Youth Soccer Club Inc and the most unlike its peers is Urban Champions Academy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Gulf Coast Youth Soccer Club Inc ↗
- Who funds ANGLETON SOCCER CLUB ↗
- Who funds SOUTH TEXAS YOUTH SOCCER ASSOCIATION TEXAS UNITTED FC ↗
- Who funds Coastal Bend Youth Soccer Association ↗
- Who funds SOUTH TEXAS YOUTH SOCCER ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds All City Youth Programs ↗
- Who funds HAYS COUNTY YOUTH ATHLETIC ASSN ↗
- Who funds URBAN CHAMPIONS ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds BASTROP YOUTH SOCCER ORGANIZATION INC ↗
- Who funds DRAGONS SOCCER CLUB INC ↗
- Who funds NEW BRAUNFELS YOUTH SOCCER ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds BEAUMONT YOUTH SOCCER CLUB ↗
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization South Texas Youth Soccer Association funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.