Loading…
· Community foundation
SOUTH PACIFIC COUNTY COMMUNITY
To foster a dynamic, thriving community: the foundation achieved this by hosting educational or informative events for nonprofit organizations and donors; providing networking opportunities; highlighting nonprofits mission and projects through social media and giving catalog; and by managing its own, agency, and donor-directed funds.
$217k
Granted FY2024
5
Grants
1
Communities
$74k
Largest
01What you fund
0179% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2019–2024.
Human Services$110kHealth$74kHousing & Shelter$27kAnimals$12kFood & Nutrition$10kOther$61k
02FY2024 · 5 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k2 grants · $14k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $22k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $74k
$10,746
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
- OCEAN BEACH HOSPITAL FOUNDATI$73,732
- OCEAN PARK FOOD BANK$11,211
- PACIFIC STEM ROBOTICS CLUB$10,746
- DYLAN JUDE HARREL COMM CTR$7,761
- FOOD 4 KIDS BACKBACK PROGRAM$6,076
02The need
03
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $110k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13% — the area typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
51%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$148k · 5 repeat orgs$145k to everyone else
5 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
5
5
Total granted
$148k
$54k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+44%
+55%
Still filing today
100%
60%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 17% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $91k went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
Human ServicesHealthHousing & ShelterAnimalsFood & NutritionOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PCPACIFIC COUNTY IMMIGRANT SUPPORT5× · 2019–2023 · $51k · revenue +44%
- RTREBUILDING TOGETHER PACIFIC C2× · 2023–2024 · $27k · revenue +35%
- LBLONG BEACH ELKS LODGE #19372× · 2020–2021 · $25k · revenue +11%
Funded once
- CACOASTAL ALLIANCE FOR YOUTHone grant, 2021 · $20k · revenue -99% · 90% of their budget
- SPSOUTH PACIFIC COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETYgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $12k · revenue +55%
- OPOCEAN PARK FOOD BANKgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +59%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Particular Council of Santa Cruz County Society of St Vincent De
Provides a food pantry service to homeless and low income families. Also provides in-home person-to-person financial assistance to families in financial crisis who may lack housing or food or health care.
Human Services
2
Sisters Cold Weather Shelter
SCWS' mission is to unite the Sisters area community in a shared commitment to supporting our most vulnerable neighbors. We strive to ensure that every individual has access to life's essentials - from food and shelter to vital resources…
Housing & Shelter
3
Oceanside Homeless Resource
Provide community resources for homeless
Human Services
4
South Whidbey Homeless Coalition
We provide community members facing homlessness with chelter, resurces, and advoccy to create a strong and thriving widbey island.
Housing & Shelter
5
Puget Sound Veterans Hope Center
To end Veteran homelessness by providing encouragement, resources and one-on-one support by Veterans helping Veterans.
Human Services
6
Seattle Homeless Outreach
We provide emergency and humanitarian outreach services to our neighbors living outside. Our mission is to meet people where they are, without expectation or judgment
Human Services
7
Sunshine for Humanity Inc
Homeless Shelter
Health
8
Family Promise of Cowlitz County
To help families with children in our community who are situationally homeless achieve sustainable independence through a community based response by providing temporary housing, usually 60-90 days, along with case management.
Human Services
9
Peninsula Community Health Services of
Strengthening the community by providing accessible and affordable health care.
Health
10
Peninsula Humane Society & Spca
To ensure humane treatment and quality of life for all animals.
Animals
11
Shoreline Community Care
The purpose of Shoreline Community Care is to offer hope by providing financial, spiritual and practical resources for residents of Shoreline while helping them achieve a healthy budget and attain freedom from indebtedness.
Human Services
12
South Bay Seniors-People Helping People
South Bay Seniors-People Helping People (PHP) is an organization that collects, warehouses, and distributes bread, fruits, vegetables, and frozen foods to the elderly, needy and homeless. PHP also lends medical equipment such as walkers…
Community Improvement
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rebuilding Together Pacific County and the most unlike its peers is Djh Kids and Community Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network
11 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
10/11
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Human Services$109,507Health$73,732Other$60,745Housing & Shelter$26,901Animals$11,874Food & Nutrition$9,934
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds OCEAN BEACH HOSPITAL FOUNDATI ↗
- Who funds PACIFIC COUNTY IMMIGRANT SUPPORT ↗
- Who funds REBUILDING TOGETHER PACIFIC C ↗
- Who funds LONG BEACH ELKS LODGE #1937 ↗
- Who funds DYLAN JUDE HARRELL COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
- Who funds PENNINSULA POVERTY RESPONSE ↗
- Who funds COASTAL ALLIANCE FOR YOUTH ↗
- Who funds SOUTH PACIFIC COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds OCEAN PARK FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL AT ST MARY'S PARISH ↗
- Who funds FOOD 4 KIDS BACKBACK PROGRAM ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.
Amazonsmile FoundationWA1.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation SOUTH PACIFIC COUNTY COMMUNITY funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: COASTAL ALLIANCE FOR YOUTH.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
insufficient risk
Limited financial data in public filings.
Track record & reputation
high risk
5 years of Form 990 filings, no recent filing.
Legal standing
medium risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 203585444 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on COASTAL ALLIANCE FOR YOUTH, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
- FlagSustained operations— No recent filing on record.
- WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 90% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to South Pacific County Community?
Find your warmest path to South Pacific County Community through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines